CLARITY Act May Not Pass Before April, Says Senate Leader John Thune

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the CLARITY Act, a key cryptocurrency market structure bill, is unlikely to be considered before April. The legislation aims to clarify regulatory roles for digital assets in the U.S., specifically defining the responsibilities of agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Lawmakers are currently prioritizing other pressing issues, including the SAVE America Act. Thune expressed hope that the market structure bill would advance later, though not immediately. There are concerns that delays could hinder U.S. competitiveness, as other countries like China may gain ground in crypto innovation. Despite the postponement, there is optimism that the bill could pass in 2026 if negotiations proceed smoothly. The act seeks to reduce regulatory uncertainty and support innovation in the digital asset market.

John Thune, the leader of the U.S Senate majority, said that lawmakers may consider delaying the legislation on the crypto market structure until April. He said that the Senate Banking Committee may consider it later. Since lawmakers are currently busy working on other pressing issues. The proposed legislation, known as the CLARITY Act, aims to help lawmakers clarify rules governing digital assets and cryptocurrencies in the US.
The lawmakers proposed the legislation to clarify the roles that different regulators play in the management of digital assets and the overall financial market.

In post X by Eleanor Terret, indicate that the Senate will focus on the SAVE America Act first before the crypto market structure bill. Thune said, “Market structure is a bill that’s, I’m hoping, going to come out soon.” He added that the legislation will probably move forward “probably not before, I would say, the April time period.”

Lawmakers discussed various policy issues related to stablecoin regulation and financial oversight when they shared these comments. Industry observers closely watch these developments because they could significantly influence future cryptocurrency regulations. The lawmakers had already moved previous versions of these bills through House committees during previous discussions. However, Senate leaders are now indicating that they will tackle other legislative priorities before considering cryptocurrency bills.

Debate Over Crypto Regulation Continues

Donald Trump has indicated that continued delays in the regulation of the crypto market could affect the U.S digital asset market. According to Trump, continued delays could allow other countries, like China. This was to have a better position in the world’s cryptocurrency market. He stated that continued delays in the legislation could allow innovation and development to occur outside the United States.

The regulators are working on clarifying the responsibilities that different bodies, like the SEC and CFTC in the United States, have in regulating digital assets. This is in a bid to reduce the uncertainty that exists in the digital assets market and the investments that occur in the market. There is optimism among lawmakers regarding the legislation despite the proposed adjustments that are expected in the Senate. There is a likelihood that the legislation could be passed later in 2026 if everything goes smoothly in the negotiations.

According to different policy analysts, the legislation could be passed later in 2026 if everything goes smoothly in the negotiations. There are continued calls by different bodies for lawmakers to establish clear regulations that support innovation in the digital assets market.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Miners Turn to Asset Strategies as Profit Pressures Intensify

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTC)BlockchainClarity ACTU.S SenateUS Senate

Related Questions

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CLARITY Act is proposed legislation that aims to clarify the rules governing digital assets and cryptocurrencies in the US, specifically by defining the roles that different regulators play in their management and the overall financial market.

QAccording to Senate Leader John Thune, when is the crypto market structure bill likely to be considered?

ASenate Leader John Thune stated that the crypto market structure bill will probably not be considered until the April time period, as lawmakers are currently focused on other pressing issues like the SAVE America Act.

QWhy are industry observers closely watching the developments around this legislation?

AIndustry observers are closely watching these developments because the legislation could significantly influence future cryptocurrency regulations in the United States.

QWhat concern did Donald Trump raise regarding delays in U.S. crypto regulation?

ADonald Trump indicated that continued delays in regulating the crypto market could allow other countries, like China, to gain a better position in the world's cryptocurrency market, causing innovation and development to occur outside the United States.

QWhich U.S. regulatory bodies are working to clarify their responsibilities in regulating digital assets?

ARegulators like the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) are working on clarifying their responsibilities in regulating digital assets to reduce market uncertainty.

Related Reads

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报27m ago

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报27m ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit1h ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit1h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片