CLARITY Act edges closer – But ONE disagreement is holding everything up

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-18Last updated on 2026-03-18

Abstract

The CLARITY Act, a key piece of U.S. crypto market structure legislation, is advancing but remains stalled due to a major disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins. While the crypto industry supports such products, traditional banks oppose them, fearing capital flight from deposits. Despite this impasse, political pressure is mounting, notably from President Donald Trump, who publicly demanded the bill's swift passage to maintain U.S. financial leadership and prevent innovation from moving abroad. The crypto community expresses growing confidence in the bill's eventual success, with Polymarket bettors assigning a 62% probability of it passing in 2026. The legislation aims to provide regulatory clarity and unlock institutional investment, but disagreements continue to delay progress.

The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins. However, clear rules for the rest of the crypto market are still missing.

That may soon change, as the recent data from Santiment suggested the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act is moving closer to the final stage of the legislative process.

If passed, the bill could mark a turning point for institutional investment in crypto, providing clearer regulatory guidance for large investors.

Source: Santiment/X

CLARITY Act talks continue

Talking about the same at the DC Blockchain Summit on the 17th of March, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott said the bill is still delayed due to a disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins.

While the crypto industry supports such products, banks fear they could pull large amounts of money away from traditional deposits.

That said, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks are currently reviewing these concerns and pushing for stronger safeguards if crypto products function like bank services.

This cautious approach has slowed the bill’s progress. Meanwhile, political pressure is growing, especially after U.S. President Donald Trump urged lawmakers to pass the Act quickly.

President Trump demands CLARITY Act passage

On the 4th of March, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social,

The Genius Act is being threatened and undermined by the Banks, and that is unacceptable — We are not going to allow it. The U.S. needs to get Market Structure done, ASAP.

Donald Trump’s statement has shifted the debate around the CLARITY Act from a technical policy issue to a broader economic and strategic concern.

He argues that without clear crypto regulations, capital and innovation could move to countries like China, making the bill important for maintaining U.S. financial leadership.

Trump also criticized major banks for resisting crypto reforms, despite reporting record profits, suggesting they are prioritizing their own interests.

By linking the CLARITY Act to his goal of making the U.S. the global crypto capital, he has increased pressure on lawmakers to move the legislation forward.

Crypto community stands confident

The confidence was also reflected in the crypto community, as noted by Senator Kevin Cramer when he said,

I think we have to make this a committee priority for some time just before Easter or shortly after.

Echoing similar sentiments, Dan Spuller, EVP of Industry Affairs at Blockchain Association, added,

I’m now increasingly confident we’re going to get CLARITY through, and we’re not going to let the banks rig the outcome.

Polymarket odds and other hiccups

Additionally, Polymarket bettors have also pushed the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 to a commanding 62%.

Source: Polymarket

Needless to say, the bill has now become the center of a growing clash between the U.S. government and traditional banks.

This disagreement has stalled the bill since early 2026. Thus, as expected, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, had put it best when he said,

The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.


Final Summary

  • Clear rules could unlock large institutional capital that has remained cautious due to regulatory uncertainty.
  • However, a key disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins continues to slow progress.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main disagreement holding up the CLARITY Act according to the article?

AThe main disagreement is over interest-bearing stablecoins, with the crypto industry supporting such products while banks fear they could pull large amounts of money away from traditional deposits.

QWhat did U.S. President Donald Trump say about the CLARITY Act and the banks?

APresident Trump stated that the 'Genius Act' (referring to the CLARITY Act) is being 'threatened and undermined by the Banks' and that this is unacceptable. He argued that the U.S. needs to get Market Structure done ASAP and criticized major banks for resisting crypto reforms despite reporting record profits.

QAccording to the article, what is the predicted probability of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 on Polymarket?

APolymarket bettors have pushed the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 to 62%.

QHow did Trump's advisor, Patrick Witt, characterize attempts to change the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt characterized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill as 'shameful,' stating that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhat previous legislation created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins, as mentioned in the article?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins.

Related Reads

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit10m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit10m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy ONE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Harmony (ONE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Harmony (ONE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Harmony (ONE)After purchasing your Harmony (ONE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Harmony (ONE)Easily trade Harmony (ONE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.7k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ONE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ONE (ONE) are presented below.

活动图片