CARF Global Implementation Timeline Overview: What Are the Commitments of Mainland China and Hong Kong?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is a global framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto-assets, targeting crypto-asset service providers as reporting entities. As of the end of 2025, 76 jurisdictions have committed to implementing CARF, with a phased rollout plan. The first group, including the UK and EU member states, will begin automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028. Data collection for reportable transactions will begin one year prior, starting in 2026. Hong Kong has explicitly committed to implementing CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data in 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with partner jurisdictions in 2028. Service providers operating in Hong Kong must establish compliance and reporting mechanisms. In contrast, Mainland China has not yet committed to CARF and is not included in any of the implementation batches. It is also not listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction with relevance that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict limitations on crypto-asset activities, there are no legal crypto-asset service providers that could be integrated into the CARF system. Therefore, in the short term, Mainland China does not meet the conditions for participating in CARF's routine information exchange. It is noted that Mainland C...

Author: Fintax

Basic Positioning of CARF

CARF is a framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets, with crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, used to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

Global Implementation Progress and Timeline

According to information released by the OECD Global Forum, as of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing CARF and will advance its implementation in batches.

The first group of jurisdictions plans to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027, primarily including the UK and EU member states, etc.; the second group of jurisdictions plans to fully implement in 2028, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and China Hong Kong, etc.

According to the institutional arrangement, the collection of relevant transaction data will commence one year in advance, starting from 2026, crypto-asset service providers will need to systematically organize reportable transaction information.

Figure 1: Overview of CARF Implementation Progress in Major Jurisdictions

China Hong Kong: Clear Participation and Timetable Advancement

In the aforementioned arrangement, China Hong Kong has clearly committed to implementing CARF and will advance related work according to the international timetable.

Hong Kong plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028.

Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms, and relevant reportable transactions will be included in the cross-border information exchange process.

Mainland China: Not Yet Committed and Outside the Implementation Scope

In comparison, Mainland China has not yet made an implementation commitment to CARF.

As of the current stage, Mainland China is not included in any implementation batch of CARF, nor has it been listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction that is relevant but has not yet committed to participation.

Under the current regulatory framework, the mainland adopts a strict restrictive attitude towards cryptocurrency trading activities, and there are no legal crypto-asset service providers within the country that can be纳入 the CARF reporting system; therefore, it does not currently meet the institutional conditions for participating in CARF's regularized information exchange.

Future Possibilities and Realistic Judgment

It should be pointed out that Mainland China has fully implemented CRS since 2018 and has mature experience in financial account information exchange.

If future crypto-asset regulatory policies are adjusted, the mainland has the institutional and technical conditions to对接 CARF.

However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of Mainland China joining this framework around the 2027 launch of CARF and in the following years remains relatively low.

Related Questions

QWhat is the CARF and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is an international framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets. It targets crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, aiming to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

QHow many jurisdictions have committed to implementing the CARF as of the end of 2025, and what is the implementation timeline?

AAs of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing the CARF. The first group of jurisdictions, including the UK and EU member states, plan to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, China, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028.

QWhat is the commitment and implementation plan of Hong Kong, China regarding the CARF?

AHong Kong, China has explicitly committed to implementing the CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and begin automatic exchange of tax information with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028. Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework will need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms.

QWhat is the current status of Mainland China's commitment to the CARF?

AMainland China has not yet made a commitment to implement the CARF. It is not included in any of the implementation batches listed by the OECD and is not currently classified as a relevant jurisdiction that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict restrictions on crypto-asset activities, there are no legitimate crypto-asset service providers that could be incorporated into the CARF reporting system, making short-term participation unlikely.

QDoes Mainland China have the foundational experience to potentially join the CARF in the future?

AYes, Mainland China has comprehensive experience in financial account information exchange, having fully implemented the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) since 2018. This provides it with the technical and institutional foundation to potentially adapt to the CARF requirements if its crypto-asset regulatory policy were to change in the future. However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of joining the CARF around its 2027 launch or in the subsequent few years remains relatively low.

Related Reads

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit4m ago

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit4m ago

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

cryptonews.ru9m ago

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ru9m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片