Cardano Founder Shares What To Expect For XRP If The Clarity ACT Is Passed

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson states that the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could provide established tokens like XRP with clearer regulatory treatment, effectively granting them a "grandfathered" status that spares them from being classified as securities. However, he strongly criticizes the bill for its default treatment of all new tokens as securities, which he argues gives the SEC too much power and creates significant obstacles for future crypto innovation. He also highlights that the bill offers no protections or pathways for decentralized finance (DeFi) projects and stablecoin yields. In contrast, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse supports the bill as a workable starting point, creating a notable divide within the industry.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could end up giving established tokens like XRP a cleaner regulatory lane, although the bill would set a damaging default rule for the next generation of US-based crypto projects.

During a recent livestream, Hoskinson complained that the framework treats everything as a security first. This could then force projects to fight their way out of that label through a process he says the SEC could easily weaponize. In the same breath, he suggested XRP may be among the assets that get grandfathered into safer treatment under the bill’s structure

Hoskinson Says XRP Gets A Pass

The Clarity Act is a proposed piece of US legislation designed to create a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies and digital assets. This bill has been advancing with US lawmakers and there are claims that it may be passed anytime in April. In a most recent livestream on YouTube, the Cardano co-founder interpreted the CLARITY Act as a line between legacy networks and future launches.

Interestingly, Hoskinson noted the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could end up sparing established tokens like XRP and maybe Cardano from being treated as securities, essentially rolling XRP into a grandfather status and placing it among the networks most likely to benefit from the bill’s structure.

However, the same bill would leave decentralized finance with no real protections or path forward. He said “there’s nothing in this for Defi; nothing,” then pointed to Uniswap and prediction markets as examples of what he believes the legislation ignores.

He also used the stablecoin yield fight as proof that important parts of crypto’s products still don’t have a seat at the table. In his words, even Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong “can’t even get his yield-bearing stablecoins.” This is related to stablecoin yield regulations included in the Act.

Totally Against The Clarity Act

The comments in this livestream did not come out of nowhere. Hoskinson has been publicly negative on the CLARITY Act for the past few weeks, calling it a bill that looks like progress on paper but leaves loopholes for regulators to keep projects trapped under securities treatment.

The friction has also spilled into a high-profile industry divide because Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has taken the opposite posture in public comments, pushing the idea that the sector should accept a workable framework and then keep improving it through amendments.

Notably, Garlinghouse’s comments can be seen as confident the bill can pass on a fast timeline, even as leaders like Hoskinson call it flawed. Another industry name who has expressed concern is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who noted that the bill is giving way for banks to come in and get to do regulatory capture to ban their competition.

Price remains shaky despite rising sentiment | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main concern Charles Hoskinson has about the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act?

AHoskinson's main concern is that the framework treats everything as a security first, forcing projects to fight their way out of that label through a process the SEC could easily weaponize, which would be damaging for the next generation of US-based crypto projects.

QAccording to Hoskinson, which established tokens could benefit from the CLARITY Act's grandfather status?

AHoskinson suggests that established tokens like XRP and possibly Cardano (ADA) could be grandfathered into safer treatment and spared from being classified as securities under the bill's structure.

QWhat does Hoskinson say the CLARITY Act offers for the DeFi (Decentralized Finance) sector?

AHoskinson states that the CLARITY Act offers nothing for DeFi, providing no real protections or path forward, and he cites examples like Uniswap and prediction markets as being ignored by the legislation.

QHow does the stance of Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse on the CLARITY Act differ from that of Charles Hoskinson?

ABrad Garlinghouse has taken the opposite posture, publicly advocating that the crypto sector should accept the CLARITY Act as a workable framework and then improve it through amendments, whereas Hoskinson is strongly against the bill.

QWhat specific regulatory issue does Hoskinson highlight using the example of Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

AHoskinson uses the stablecoin yield fight as an example, pointing out that even Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong 'can’t even get his yield-bearing stablecoins,' highlighting that important parts of crypto products still lack a clear regulatory path under the Act.

Related Reads

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit47m ago

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit47m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit49m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片