Canton Network price surges on usage – Yet dip below $0.12 possible IF…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-30Last updated on 2025-12-30

Abstract

Canton Network's token (CC) surged 84% in under three weeks, reaching $0.126, driven by increased network usage and demand for its real-world asset (RWA) focus. Despite bullish longer-term structure and key support at $0.122, a deeper retracement toward $0.105 is anticipated due to a bearish descending triangle pattern and concentrated long liquidations. Traders are advised to wait for a dip before buying, unless CC breaks above the $0.133 resistance. Growing on-chain adoption supports long-term confidence, but short-term downward pressure is likely.

Canton Network was catching the attention of traders and investors. The utility token of the Layer 1 focused on RWAs has rallied 84% in under three weeks, from $0.068 to $0.126.

The network boasted of increasing user activity.

Network usage and genuine demand during a time of market-wide uncertainty are achievements that can drive further adoption and boost investor confidence.

At the time of writing, the token CC had retested the $0.122 level as support. Is this a buying opportunity, or will the retracement go deeper?

Longer-term CC structure remains bullish

The 1-day chart showed that the structure and trend were firmly bullish. Moreover, the token’s trading volume was not as high as it had been in November, when the token was newly launched.

It was reflected in the seemingly lackluster OBV.

CC’s OBV was climbing higher over the past three weeks, showing that buying pressure has been steady. The drop-off in trading volume was a slight concern, but not enough to upturn the bullish bias on the daily timeframe.

Additionally, the $0.122 and $0.110 levels were key support levels, which had been a resistance level earlier this month. A retest of either level would be interesting to Canton Network [CC] bulls.

The case for a bullish breakout

On the hourly timeframe, the OBV was rising higher as CC prices remained defiantly above the $0.124 support level. This suggested there was potential for a bullish breakout from here, if demand increases over the next 24-48 hours.

This scenario is unlikely, based on the evidence at hand.

Traders’ call to action – Wait for a deeper retracement

The descending triangle chart on the 1-hour chart is typically a bearish continuation pattern. A breakdown below the $0.124 support would confirm a deeper retracement.

The concentration of long liquidations from $0.12-$0.105 meant CC prices would likely fall toward this area before reversing the losses. Hence, traders can wait for a deeper price dip before buying.

A breakout past the $0.132-$0.133 local resistance zone would invalidate this idea.


Final Thoughts

  • The Canton Network saw growing adoption onchain, which could drive demand and investor confidence in the long term.
  • In the coming days, CC is expected to retrace toward $0.105 due to the long liquidation levels clustered beneath the price.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Questions

QWhat is the Canton Network's utility token and how much has it rallied in under three weeks?

AThe Canton Network's utility token is CC, and it has rallied 84% in under three weeks, from $0.068 to $0.126.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key support levels for the CC token?

AThe two key support levels for the CC token are $0.122 and $0.110.

QWhat on-chain achievement is the Canton Network boasting about that could drive further adoption?

AThe Canton Network is boasting about increasing user activity and genuine demand during a time of market-wide uncertainty.

QWhat pattern on the 1-hour chart suggests a potential for a deeper price retracement?

AA descending triangle pattern on the 1-hour chart, which is typically a bearish continuation pattern, suggests a potential for a deeper retracement.

QWhat price level would invalidate the idea of a deeper retracement and waiting to buy?

AA breakout past the $0.132-$0.133 local resistance zone would invalidate the idea of a deeper retracement.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片