Cango Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation into an AI Infrastructure Platform

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

Canggu (NYSE: CANG) reported its 2025 full-year and Q4 financial results, highlighting a significant revenue of $688.1 million for the year, with $675.5 million coming from Bitcoin mining. The company mined 6,594.6 Bitcoin in 2025, averaging 18.07 per day. However, it reported a net loss of $452.8 million for the year, primarily due to one-time transition costs and market-driven fair value adjustments. In Q4, the net loss was $285.0 million. Canggu is strategically pivoting towards becoming an AI infrastructure provider, leveraging its scalable computing and energy network capabilities. The company completed its transition to a direct listing on the NYSE and has taken steps to optimize its balance sheet, including selling Bitcoin to repay debt. As of December 31, 2025, it held $41.2 million in cash and had long-term debt of $557.6 million.

Dallas, Texas, March 16, 2026 - Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "Cango" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a Bitcoin mining enterprise with a global operational footprint dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing platform, Cango is steadily advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.

2025 Full Year and Fourth Quarter Financial and Operational Highlights

• Financial Performance:

Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.

Bitcoin mining revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.

Full year Adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.

• Mining Operations and Costs:

A total of 6,594.6 Bitcoins were mined for the full year, averaging 18.07 per day; 1,718.3 Bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 per day.

The average mining cost (excluding miner depreciation) for the full year was $79,707 per Bitcoin, and $84,552 in the fourth quarter;

The all-in cost was $97,272 and $106,251 per Bitcoin, respectively.

As of the end of December 2025, the Company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 Bitcoins since entering the Bitcoin mining business.

• Strategic Progress:

The Company has completed the termination of its ADR (American Depositary Receipt) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, which is expected to broaden the investor base in the long term.

Mr. Paul Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, stated, "2025 was the first full year for the Company as a Bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized overall by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Concurrently, the Company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantages in the digital asset and energy infrastructure sectors. The completion of the direct listing on the NYSE and USD denomination also marks our transition towards becoming a global AI infrastructure company."

"Entering 2026, the Company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and improve operational efficiency and cost resilience through miner portfolio adjustments. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-competitive AI inference solutions. Relevant site modifications and product development are currently underway, and the Company has laid the foundation for continued execution in this new phase."

Mr. Michael Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, stated, "In 2025, the Company achieved significant revenue growth driven by its scaled mining operations. Net loss from continuing operations was $452.8 million, primarily impacted by one-time transition costs and market-driven fair value adjustments. Financially, the Company will optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, reduce leverage levels, and introduce new capital to enhance financial strength, thereby navigating market volatility while seizing investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure."

Financial Performance of Continuing Operations for Q4 2025

Revenue

Total revenue for the fourth quarter was $179.5 million. Bitcoin mining revenue contributed $172.4 million, with 1,718.3 Bitcoins produced in the quarter. International auto trading business revenue was $4.8 million.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter were $456.0 million, primarily attributable to Bitcoin mining-related expenditures, as well as miner impairment losses and fair value changes of Bitcoin-collateralized receivables.

Specifically includes:

· Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation): $155.3 million

· Cost of revenues (depreciation): $38.1 million

· General and administrative expenses: $9.9 million (including $1.1 million from related parties)

· Miner impairment loss: $81.4 million

· Loss on fair value change of Bitcoin-collateralized receivables: $171.4 million

Profitability

Operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, significantly wider than the loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the decline in Bitcoin price.

Net loss from continuing operations was $285.0 million, compared to a net income of $2.4 million in the prior year period.

Adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the prior year period.

Financial Performance of Continuing Operations for Full Year 2025

Revenue

Total revenue for the full year was $688.1 million. Bitcoin mining revenue was $675.5 million, with 6,594.6 Bitcoins produced for the year. International auto trading business revenue was $9.8 million.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Total operating costs and expenses for the full year were $1.1 billion.

Specifically includes:

· Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million

· Cost of revenues (depreciation): $116.6 million

· General and administrative expenses: $28.9 million (including $1.1 million from related parties)

· Miner impairment loss: $338.3 million

· Loss on fair value change of Bitcoin-collateralized receivables: $96.5 million

Profitability

Operating loss for the full year was $437.1 million. Net loss from continuing operations was $452.8 million, compared to a net income of $4.8 million in 2024.

Non-GAAP adjusted net income for 2025 was $24.5 million (2024: $5.7 million). This metric excludes share-based compensation expenses; see "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures."

Financial Position

As of December 31, 2025, the Company's main assets and liabilities were as follows:

· Cash and cash equivalents: $41.2 million

· Bitcoin-collateralized receivables (non-current, related party): $663.0 million

· Net book value of miners: $248.7 million

· Long-term debt (related party): $557.6 million

The Company sold 4,451 Bitcoins in February 2026 and repaid a portion of the related party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize its balance sheet structure.

Share Repurchase

Pursuant to the share repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 890,155 Class A ordinary shares for a total amount of approximately $1.2 million as of December 31, 2025.

Related Questions

QWhat was Cango Inc.'s total revenue for the full year 2025 and what was the primary source of this revenue?

ACango Inc.'s total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million. The primary source of this revenue was its Bitcoin mining business, which contributed $675.5 million.

QHow many Bitcoins did Cango mine in Q4 2025 and what was the average daily production rate?

ACango mined 1,718.3 Bitcoins in the fourth quarter of 2025, with an average daily production rate of 18.68 Bitcoins.

QWhat significant strategic move did Cango complete regarding its stock listing, and what was the stated purpose?

ACango terminated its ADR (American Depositary Receipt) plan and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE. The stated purpose was to enhance information transparency, align with its strategic direction, and potentially broaden its investor base in the long term.

QWhat was the main reason for the significant net loss from continuing operations in Q4 2025, as mentioned in the financial report?

AThe significant net loss from continuing operations in Q4 2025, which was $285.0 million, was primarily due to the impact of the declining Bitcoin price, which led to substantial losses such as the $171.4 million fair value change loss on Bitcoin-collateralized receivables.

QWhat is Cango's new strategic focus for transformation, and which subsidiary is being leveraged for this initiative?

ACango's new strategic focus is to transform into an AI infrastructure provider. The company is leveraging its subsidiary, EcoHash, to utilize its capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-competitive AI inference solutions.

Related Reads

A Voice from a Seasoned Polymarket User: We've Actually Been Overtaken by Our Competitor

A veteran Polymarket user expresses deep concern that the platform is losing its leadership in the prediction market space to its competitor, Kalshi. Despite Polymarket's pioneering role, strong brand, and cultural significance, operational issues and strategic missteps have allowed Kalshi to gain a significant advantage. Key points include: - Kalshi now has a higher valuation ($22B vs. $15B) and greater trading volume year-to-date. - Polymarket faces repeated technical delays, poor communication, and extended downtime, undermining user trust. - The recent announcement of perpetual contracts—prior to fixing core platform issues and fully launching the U.S. app—signals misplaced priorities, focusing on monetization over stability and accessibility. - The author urges Polymarket to prioritize fixing the platform, opening the U.S. app to all users, and improving operational reliability before expanding into new products. Despite these challenges, the author remains optimistic due to Polymarket’s iconic brand, strong community, major partnerships (e.g., ICE, MLB), and regulatory positioning. The piece concludes with a call to action: stabilize the core product, execute reliably, and reclaim market leadership.

marsbit2m ago

A Voice from a Seasoned Polymarket User: We've Actually Been Overtaken by Our Competitor

marsbit2m ago

MetaMask Co-founder Departs, Leaving Behind a Little Fox Packaged in an IPO Prospectus

MetaMask co-founder Dan Finlay has left Consensys after a decade, citing burnout and a desire to spend more time with family. MetaMask, launched in 2016, is one of the most recognizable crypto wallets with over 100 million installs and 30 million monthly active users. Despite its dominant position, the wallet faces growing competition from newer entrants like Phantom, which has expanded beyond Solana and reportedly generates more than double MetaMask’s annual revenue. The timing of Finlay’s departure coincides with Consensys’s plans for an IPO, advised by J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs. The company, last valued at $7 billion in 2022, has undergone multiple rounds of layoffs amid slowing growth and internal challenges. Employee reviews on Glassdoor point to low morale and management issues. MetaMask’s delayed expansion into chains like Solana and the long-promised but unreleased $MASK token have also drawn criticism. While the wallet remains the default option for many Ethereum dApps, its product-market fit is weakening as new users increasingly choose alternatives. Consensys appears to be prioritizing monetizing MetaMask’s strong brand recognition through a public listing while its market position is still valuable. Finlay’s quiet exit reflects both personal fatigue and broader shifts in the competitive landscape of crypto wallets.

marsbit4m ago

MetaMask Co-founder Departs, Leaving Behind a Little Fox Packaged in an IPO Prospectus

marsbit4m ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn1h ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn1h ago

Unicorn Report: Within an Hour's Drive of the Bay Area, 90% of the World's AI Market Value is Concentrated

The 2025 Unicorn Report by Elad Gil reveals a dramatic concentration of AI unicorn value in the San Francisco Bay Area, which now holds 91% of the global generative AI unicorn market capitalization within a one-hour drive radius. The U.S. dominates globally with 65% of all unicorn value, a significant increase from previous years. While the rate of new unicorn creation has slowed post-2022, the average valuation of existing unicorns has reached a six-year high, driven overwhelmingly by AI companies. Generative AI unicorns saw an average valuation increase of $2.2 billion, far outpacing non-AI unicorns. The data indicates a powerful clustering effect, with the Bay Area solidifying its position as the world's premier AI hub, while other U.S. cities like New York and Los Angeles specialize in fintech/crypto and aerospace/defense, respectively.

marsbit1h ago

Unicorn Report: Within an Hour's Drive of the Bay Area, 90% of the World's AI Market Value is Concentrated

marsbit1h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit2h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions