British Banking Giant Standard Chartered Unveils Its Long-Term Price Forecast for Altcoin UNI!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

British banking giant Standard Chartered has revised its long-term outlook for the Uniswap token ($UNI) upwards, citing stronger-than-expected results from its Robinhood integration. According to Geoffrey Kendrick, head of digital assets research at the bank, the launch of the Robinhood-linked fee mechanism on July 27 nearly doubled the annualized rate of UNI tokens being burned to $90 million. This equates to approximately 25 million tokens annually, removing over 4% of the total supply and potentially exerting upward pressure on the UNI price if demand holds. While Standard Chartered notes sustaining this burn rate long-term may be challenging, even a reduced rate of 2.2% would represent a strong supply reduction mechanism. Kendrick suggests future partnerships like Robinhood could further impact the token's economics, meaning the bank's previously forecasted $100 UNI target for 2030 could be conservative. The report concludes that UNI may remain a closely watched asset if DeFi sector growth continues.

British banking giant Standard Chartered has given important assessments regarding the long-term prospects of Uniswap's native token, $UNI. Geoffrey Kendrick, head of the bank's digital assets research unit, stated that the collaboration between Uniswap and Robinhood has yielded stronger results than expected, and that the previously forecasted target price for $UNI by 2030 may prove to be conservative.

According to information published by The Block, Kendrick spoke of a significant increase in the rate of $UNI token burning following the activation of the fee-sharing mechanism linked to Robinhood on July 27. According to the analyst, the volume of burned $UNI tokens after that date nearly doubled, reaching $90 million on an annualized basis.

Kendrick stated that, based on current prices, this corresponds to approximately 25 million $UNI tokens, meaning that over 4% of the total token supply is being removed from the system annually. It is estimated that this supply reduction could exert upward pressure on the price of $UNI if demand persists or increases.

However, Standard Chartered also emphasized that maintaining the current level of resource expenditure over a long period might be challenging. Kendrick stated that even if the price of $UNI rises to his projected level of $6.50 by the end of 2026, the annual rate of resource expenditure would remain around 2.2 percent. In the analyst's view, this rate still indicates a sufficiently strong supply reduction mechanism for the long term.

Kendrick also stated that the implementation of new partnership programs similar to Robinhood in the future could have an even greater impact on the $UNI token economics. It is suggested that if token usage and burning continue, even Standard Chartered's previously announced target of $100 $UNI by 2030 might prove insufficient.

Experts assert that if growth in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector continues, $UNI could remain one of the most closely watched crypto assets in the coming years.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat key announcement did British banking giant Standard Chartered make regarding the Uniswap token (UNI)?

AStandard Chartered's digital asset research head, Geoffrey Kendrick, stated that the Uniswap and Robinhood partnership yielded stronger-than-expected results, suggesting that the bank's earlier 2030 price target for UNI might be conservative.

QWhat significant effect on UNI did the analyst observe after the fee-distribution mechanism with Robinhood launched on July 27?

AGeoffrey Kendrick noted a significant acceleration in the burn rate of UNI tokens, with the annualized value of burned tokens almost doubling to reach $90 million.

QAccording to the analyst's calculations, how much annual supply reduction does the current burn rate represent?

ABased on current prices, the burn rate corresponds to approximately 25 million UNI tokens per year, which represents over 4% of the token's total supply being removed from circulation annually.

QEven if UNI's price reaches the $6.50 forecast for late 2026, what would the annualized burn rate be, and is it considered strong?

AThe annualized burn rate would remain at about 2.2%. The analyst believes this rate still indicates a robust supply reduction mechanism in the long term.

QWhat does the article suggest about Standard Chartered's long-term price target for UNI in 2030?

AThe article suggests that if token usage and burning continue, Standard Chartered's previously announced 2030 target of $100 per UNI might prove to be insufficient or too conservative.

Related Reads

Uniswap v4 Hook Ecosystem Heats Up: 8 Early Projects Lead the Race, Who Can Build Real Business?

The Uniswap v4 Hook ecosystem is heating up, with eight early-stage projects emerging to explore its potential for customizable trading pool rules. A Hook is an external smart contract attached to a Uniswap v4 liquidity pool, allowing developers to add custom logic before or after key actions like pool creation, liquidity provision, and trading. This enables features like dynamic fees, arbitrage profit redistribution, and complex token execution rules. The article highlights Hookr (a platform for easily composing and deploying Hooks), StonkBrokers (focusing on tokenized stocks and creating "Pair Tokens"), What The Hook (redistributing arbitrage profits), Programmable (a no-code/code launchpad for tokens with Hooks), Claus (an experimental, upgradeable Hook-based token), Fables Finance (a DEX combining Hooks with a ve(3,3) model), The Standard Reserve (a monetary policy experiment using Hooks), and Bordrless (a Solana-based project with a similar programmable token concept). However, the piece emphasizes significant risks for these early projects, including smart contract vulnerabilities, low liquidity and high volatility, and potential disconnects between a Hook's utility and its token's value. The key question remains: which projects can move beyond technical experimentation to build sustainable, real-world business models using Hooks? The ecosystem is growing, but true validation through user adoption and protocol revenue is still needed.

marsbit10m ago

Uniswap v4 Hook Ecosystem Heats Up: 8 Early Projects Lead the Race, Who Can Build Real Business?

marsbit10m ago

7 People, 5 Months: Anthropic Built a Git Replacement

In a surprising move, Anthropic replaced Git, the dominant version control system for two decades, with its own internally developed system named Scion. This migration was accomplished in just five months by a team of seven engineers, heavily assisted by their AI model, Claude. The primary driver was the explosive growth of AI-powered software development at Anthropic. By September, the company was handling over 30,000 code merges per day—a 12x increase in just four months—straining Git's decentralized, offline-friendly architecture which was not designed for such massive, centralized, and always-online agent-driven workflows. Scion was designed from the ground up for this new paradigm. Its core principles include: assuming clients (AI agents and automation) are always online; offloading complex computations (like blame, diff, merges) to scalable servers; providing a full API for source control queries to eliminate local repo needs for many tasks; and enabling highly efficient, sparse, and virtualized checkouts. Key to Scion's performance is its data structure. Instead of Git's commit-and-tree model, it uses a "Changeset" stored in a write-ahead log, which records only changed files. This allows for extremely high-throughput ingestion. Additional "derived data" structures are built on-demand for operations like blame and history queries. The new architecture employs a distributed, cache-heavy design with daemons (scion-daemon), regional caches (scion-cache), and authoritative servers (scion-server). This resulted in cache hit rates over 99%, a 200x reduction in CPU/memory usage compared to their previous Git mirror infrastructure, and code checkouts that are now seconds instead of minutes. Claude played a crucial role, not only in accelerating development but also in significantly improving code quality, performance, and test coverage. The project also led to innovations in security, access control, and system monitoring using AI "Superfans." Anthropic emphasizes that Scion is not a general-purpose Git replacement. It is tailored for massive monorepos driven by vast numbers of AI agents. However, they share their learnings in hopes that the broader ecosystem can adapt some of Scion's effective patterns—like server-side APIs and optimized protocols—to enhance Git for emerging large-scale, AI-augmented development environments.

marsbit47m ago

7 People, 5 Months: Anthropic Built a Git Replacement

marsbit47m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片