Bitcoin Miners Are Abandoning 'Mining' for 'Cloud'

深潮Published on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Facing a survival crisis due to declining Bitcoin prices and rising operational costs, Bitcoin miners are increasingly pivoting to AI data center leasing as a sustainable alternative. The core business model of Bitcoin mining has become economically unviable, with the average cost to mine one Bitcoin reaching approximately $74,600—exceeding its current market price of around $91,000, resulting in significant per-unit losses. Miners are leveraging their existing infrastructure—including high-performance GPUs, pre-approved large-scale power capacity, and advanced cooling systems—to meet the explosive demand from tech giants for readily available AI data center space. This shift not only provides a stable revenue stream but also reduces reliance on volatile crypto markets. Companies like Core Scientific have successfully transitioned, now operating about 200 MW of data center capacity with plans to expand further. Beyond data center leasing, some miners are exploring broader digital asset technology (DAT) business models. This industry-wide evolution signals a move toward greater resilience and maturity, as weaker pure-play miners exit and leading firms diversify into integrated service providers.

Written by: Tiger Research

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

As Bitcoin prices continue to decline, many miners are facing a survival crisis. In the face of increasingly fierce core mining competition, how can these companies save themselves? Leasing data centers for artificial intelligence (AI) has become a highly regarded path.

Core Conclusions

  • Bitcoin mining revenue is unstable, while costs continue to rise, making the core business model unsustainable.

  • Mining companies are beginning to leverage their existing sites and infrastructure to rent out data center space to large tech companies.

  • This transformation alleviates恶性竞争 and helps improve the health and stability of the entire industry.

I. Core Operational Risks Faced by Mining Companies

The business model of Bitcoin mining companies is relatively单一, which constitutes its fundamental脆弱点. Their revenue is almost entirely tied to the highly volatile price of Bitcoin, full of unpredictability; while on the cost side, including increasing mining difficulty, rising electricity prices, and hardware迭代, it shows a rigid upward trend.

When the币价 falls, the problem is particularly acute: revenue plummets, costs remain high, creating a "squeeze from both ends" dilemma. In addition, regulatory risks loom large, such as the proposal in New York State to increase the mining consumption tax. Although it has limited impact on mining companies currently concentrated in宽松 areas like Texas, it预示着 the possibility of broader compliance pressures in the future.

All this forces mining companies to ponder a fundamental question: can the single mining business model survive in the long term?

II. Cost Inversion: The Increasingly Fragile Profit Structure

According to data from CoinShares, the average cost to mine one Bitcoin has now risen to approximately $74,600. If costs such as equipment depreciation are included, the total production cost is close to $130,000 per Bitcoin.

However, the current price of Bitcoin is around $91,000. This means that for every Bitcoin produced, mining companies face a paper loss of approximately $46,000. The increasing mining difficulty and tightening energy policies further worsen the cost structure, leading to an increasingly fragile overall profitability foundation for the industry.

III. The Path to Transformation: Why AI Data Centers?

The白热化 AI race has催生 an explosive demand for data centers from tech giants. Building data centers from scratch is time-consuming, and market opportunities are fleeting, so leasing existing, quickly adaptable facilities becomes the preferred option.

The existing assets of mining companies恰好 match this demand:

  • Computing Hardware: Possess大量 high-performance GPUs (such as NVIDIA chips) that can be repurposed for AI computing.

  • Power Resources: Already approved grid access at the数百兆瓦 level is a scarce resource in today's energy market.

  • Cooling Capacity: Experience in operating high-power mining machines积累, which can be directly applied to managing AI servers like H100/H200.

A typical case is Core Scientific, which was once濒临破产. By transforming into AI data center leasing, it now operates approximately 200 megawatts of capacity and plans to expand to 500 megawatts, successfully turning a profit. Companies like IREN and TeraWulf are also exploring similar paths of business diversification. This is not just about pursuing growth, but a necessity for survival.

IV. Diversified Evolution: More Than Just Data Centers

Transitioning to AI data center leasing is the mainstream trend, but it is not the only way out. This is essentially a rational choice for mining companies to reallocate capital to more efficient areas. Stable data center revenue can provide mining companies with a cash flow buffer, allowing them to more从容 strategically hold Bitcoin assets and avoid forced sales during market downturns.

Meanwhile, some mining companies, such as Bitmine and Cathedra Bitcoin, are exploring expansion into broader Digital Asset Technology (DAT) business models. These diversification attempts collectively point to a trend:纯挖矿 players with weak competitiveness are being淘汰 or转型, while leading companies are evolving into comprehensive service providers. The entire cryptocurrency mining industry is moving towards a new, more mature, and more resilient stage.

Related Questions

QWhat are the main reasons Bitcoin miners are facing a survival crisis?

ABitcoin miners face a survival crisis due to unstable mining income tied to volatile Bitcoin prices, while their operating costs, including rising electricity prices, increasing mining difficulty, and hardware upgrades, continue to climb. This creates a 'squeeze from both ends' that makes their core business model unsustainable.

QWhat is the average cost to mine one Bitcoin, and how does it compare to the current price?

AAccording to CoinShares, the average cost to mine one Bitcoin has risen to approximately $74,600. When including costs like equipment depreciation, the total production cost is close to $130,000 per Bitcoin. With the current Bitcoin price around $91,000, miners are facing a significant deficit for each coin they produce.

QWhy are AI data centers an attractive pivot for Bitcoin mining companies?

AAI data centers are an attractive pivot because there is explosive demand from tech giants for computing power, and building new data centers from scratch is time-consuming. Mining companies already possess the necessary assets: high-performance GPUs that can be repurposed for AI computation, pre-approved access to massive electrical grids (a scarce resource), and expertise in cooling high-power equipment, which is directly applicable to managing AI servers.

QCan you name a specific mining firm that has successfully transitioned to AI data center leasing?

AA prime example is Core Scientific. After nearly facing bankruptcy, the company successfully transitioned to AI data center leasing. It currently operates approximately 200 megawatts of capacity, with ambitions to expand to 500 megawatts, and has returned to profitability.

QBeyond AI data centers, what other diversification strategies are some mining companies exploring?

ABeyond AI data centers, some mining companies like Bitmine and Cathedra Bitcoin are exploring a broader shift towards Digital Asset Technology (DAT) business models. This overall trend towards diversification signifies the industry's evolution from pure-play mining to more mature, resilient, and comprehensive service providers.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit4m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit4m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手8m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手8m ago

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit43m ago

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit43m ago

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinist1h ago

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinist1h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit2h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

364 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions