Bitcoin hits lowest level since November 2024 as selling pressure intensifies

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

Bitcoin experienced a significant decline on Tuesday, 3 February, falling to around $73,000—its lowest level since November 2024—with a single-day loss exceeding 7%. The drop broke key support in the mid-$80,000 range, signaling a shift from consolidation to a bearish trend. Heavy volume and an RSI near 23 indicate forced selling and liquidations. While oversold conditions may prompt short-term rebounds, sustained recovery depends on reclaiming lost support levels. Downside risks remain amid ongoing distribution and weak demand.

Bitcoin extended its downside move on Tuesday, 3 February, sliding to its lowest level since November 2024. Heavy selling overwhelmed bids across spot and derivatives markets.

The decline marks a sharp escalation in downside momentum after weeks of fragile consolidation.

According to TradingView data, Bitcoin fell to around $73,000, posting a single-day loss of more than 7%. The move decisively broke below the mid-$80,000 support zone that had underpinned price action through January, opening the door to deeper downside tests.

Key support gives way as Bitcoin momentum turns sharply bearish

The latest sell-off follows multiple failed recovery attempts over the past month. Each rebound stalled at progressively lower highs, signalling weakening demand and growing seller dominance.

Once Bitcoin lost the $80,000–$82,000 support band, selling accelerated rapidly. Price action on the daily chart now reflects a clear bearish structure, with lower highs and lower lows firmly established.

Technical indicators confirm the shift. Bitcoin’s relative strength index [RSI] dropped to near 23, placing the asset deep in oversold territory.

Such readings typically reflect aggressive liquidation rather than measured profit-taking, especially when accompanied by expanding volume.

Volume surge points to forced selling

Trading volume rose sharply during the breakdown, suggesting the move was not driven solely by thin liquidity. Instead, the surge points to forced selling and stop-loss triggers, particularly among leveraged traders positioned for range continuation.

The accumulation/distribution indicator also continued to trend lower, reinforcing the view that net distribution is underway.

This suggests capital is exiting positions rather than rotating within the market, a dynamic often seen during periods of heightened risk aversion.

While oversold conditions can sometimes precede short-term relief rallies, such bounces tend to be fragile when broader trend structure remains negative.

What to watch next

For sentiment to stabilize, Bitcoin would need to reclaim broken support levels and show evidence of sustained demand, rather than short-lived short-covering rallies.

Until then, volatility is likely to remain elevated, with downside risks still in focus.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s drop below November 2024 levels confirms a transition from consolidation into active distribution.
  • Oversold signals suggest selling intensity is high, but trend recovery will depend on reclaiming lost support rather than short-term bounces.

Related Questions

QWhat was the date when Bitcoin hit its lowest level since November 2024?

ATuesday, 3 February.

QWhat key price level did Bitcoin break below, which had previously supported the price through January?

AThe mid-$80,000 support zone, specifically the $80,000–$82,000 band.

QWhat was the approximate price of Bitcoin and the single-day loss percentage mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin fell to around $73,000, posting a single-day loss of more than 7%.

QWhat did the RSI (Relative Strength Index) dropping to near 23 indicate about Bitcoin?

AIt indicated that Bitcoin was deep in oversold territory, reflecting aggressive liquidation rather than measured profit-taking.

QAccording to the article, what is needed for Bitcoin's trend recovery according to the 'Final Thoughts' section?

AReclaiming lost support levels and showing evidence of sustained demand, rather than relying on short-lived short-covering rallies.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit47m ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit47m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片