Bitcoin ETFs bleed with six weeks of outflows – What’s cooking?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

Bitcoin ETFs have experienced six consecutive weeks of outflows, signaling a significant shift in market behavior. On February 23 alone, investors withdrew $203.8 million, with BlackRock’s IBIT ETF accounting for more than half of the outflows. This marks a departure from earlier institutional support that once drove Bitcoin’s bull run. Currently, the average ETF purchase price is around $84,100, meaning most holders are facing approximately 20% losses as Bitcoin struggles near $68,000. While VanEck’s HODL saw minor inflows and Solana ETFs gained $8 million, Ethereum ETFs also faced heavy selling. The trend suggests a sustained institutional exit rather than retail panic, and a market recovery depends on whether these outflows slow or stop.

For months, Bitcoin had strong support from big financial institutions, especially through Spot Bitcoin [BTC] ETFs. Many believed this would bring stability to the market. But that belief is now being tested.

On the 24th of February, Bitcoin fell below the important $63,000 level. At the same time, the ETFs, meant to support prices, became the biggest sellers.

On the 23rd of February alone, investors pulled out $203.8 million from these funds.

These outflow streak with a few exceptions here and there shows a real behavior change. Selling is no longer coming mainly from small retail traders. Now, large institutions are also exiting their positions.

Needless to say, these were the same players once seen as long-term holders.

How did Bitcoin’s price shift sentiments?

With Bitcoin now trading almost 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,000, the mood has shifted.

The current wave of selling is a sharp break from what we saw over the last two years. When U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in early 2024, they quickly became the main driver of one of the strongest bull runs in crypto history.

During this period, Bitcoin surged from around $40,000 to a peak of $126,000, rising more than 220%. This rally was largely driven by how easy these ETFs made it for big investors to buy Bitcoin.

But in 2026, the situation has changed.

One way to see the damage is through the average buying price of ETF investors. Right now, that average is around $84,100. With Bitcoin struggling near $68,000, most ETF holders are sitting on losses of about 20%.

What happened in February?

Though there was a brief moment of hope on the 20th of February, by the 23rd of February, it was clear that selling pressure was still strong.

On the very day, investors pulled out millions, and the selling was not spread evenly. One major signal came from BlackRock’s IBIT ETF, which made up more than half of all outflows.

VanEck’s HODL ETF was the only one to see fresh money, with $6.4 million in inflows. This suggests that a small group of investors believes prices below $70,000 are a good buying opportunity. However, for now, their buying is too small to change the overall trend.

On the same day, Ethereum [ETH] ETFs also faced heavy selling. In just one day, $49.5 million was left from these funds.

Most of that came from BlackRock’s ETHA, which alone saw $45.4 million in withdrawals. Smaller outflows were also seen from VanEck and Fidelity.

A shift is happening under the wraps

However, not everything is falling apart.

While Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs are losing money, Solana [SOL] ETFs are seeing fresh inflows. On the 23rd of February, Bitcoin lost hundreds of millions, and Solana funds gained $8 million. Most of this came from Bitwise’s BSOL, which brought in $6.3 million.

Meanwhile, Ripple [XRP] ETFs are showing no movement at all. On both the 20th and 23rd of February, there were zero net inflows or outflows. This suggests XRP investors are waiting on the sidelines, unsure of the direction of the market.

Therefore, as 2026 continues, the key signal to watch is not just price, it is ETF flows.

Lastly, for Bitcoin and Ethereum to recover strongly, the current selling streak must slow down and eventually stop. All in all, the next phase will depend on whether selling dries up or accelerates further.


Final Summary

  • Six consecutive weeks of ETF outflows with a few days of exceptions show this is not panic selling; it is a sustained shift in behavior.
  • BlackRock’s large outflows signal that even the strongest institutional hands are not immune to market stress.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the recent decline in Bitcoin's stability according to the article?

AThe main reason is the sustained outflows from Spot Bitcoin ETFs, with large institutions that were once seen as long-term holders now exiting their positions, indicating a significant behavior change.

QHow much did Bitcoin's price drop from its October 2025 peak, and what is the average buying price of ETF investors?

ABitcoin's price dropped almost 50% from its October 2025 peak of $126,000. The average buying price of ETF investors is around $84,100, resulting in losses of about 20% for most holders.

QWhich specific ETF was responsible for more than half of all outflows on February 23rd, and which was the only one to see inflows?

ABlackRock’s IBIT ETF was responsible for more than half of all outflows on February 23rd. VanEck’s HODL ETF was the only one to see inflows, with $6.4 million.

QBesides Bitcoin ETFs, which other major cryptocurrency's ETFs faced heavy selling, and how much was withdrawn in a single day?

AEthereum [ETH] ETFs also faced heavy selling, with $49.5 million withdrawn in a single day, mostly from BlackRock’s ETHA which saw $45.4 million in withdrawals.

QWhat alternative cryptocurrency's ETFs are seeing fresh inflows despite the overall market trend, and how much did they gain on February 23rd?

ASolana [SOL] ETFs are seeing fresh inflows, gaining $8 million on February 23rd, with most of it ($6.3 million) coming from Bitwise’s BSOL.

Related Reads

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbit48m ago

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbit48m ago

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

Sun Yuchen, known for his controversial stunts like a $30 million lunch with Warren Buffett (canceled due to a kidney stone) and eating a $6.2 million duct-taped banana, is often overshadowed by a significant fact: his decade-long track record of spotting major investment trends. In 2016, he famously advised young people to invest in Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla, and Tencent instead of buying property. A hypothetical $20,000 investment in Nvidia and Tesla from that list would now be worth over 50 million RMB. His latest major call was on November 6, 2025, predicting a "50x storage opportunity" tied to the AI boom, which materialized with Sandisk's stock surging nearly 50-fold by 2026. Looking ahead, Sun now focuses on the next frontier: Physical AI. He identifies four key areas: 1. **Embodied AI/Robotics**: He sees this reaching its "iPhone moment," with companies like UBTech and Galaxy General leading in commercialization. 2. **Drones**: Viewed as the first commercially viable form of Physical AI, revolutionizing sectors from warfare (e.g., AeroVironment's Switchblade) to logistics. 3. **Spatial Computing**: Beyond VR, it's about AI understanding physical space, a foundational technology for robotics and autonomous systems, exemplified by Apple's Vision Pro. 4. **Space Exploration**: After a 2025 suborbital flight with Blue Origin, Sun advocates for space as the ultimate frontier, discussing blockchain's potential role in space asset management and data transactions. His investment philosophy involves betting on entire, inevitable trends rather than single companies. For robotics, he sees Tesla (the body/manufacturer) and Nvidia (the brain/AI platform) as complementary plays. In defense drones, he highlights companies making tanks obsolete (AeroVironment) and those augmenting fighter jets (Kratos). For space, he participated in Blue Origin's flight and anticipates SpaceX's potential IPO to redefine the sector's valuation. Sun Yuchen's vision frames the next two decades not as a revolution in information flow (like the internet), but in the fundamental operation of the physical world through AI-powered robots, autonomous systems, and spatial intelligence, ultimately extending human and AI activity into space. While many still focus on conventional assets, he continues to look toward the next technological horizon.

marsbit1h ago

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

marsbit1h ago

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

"The Most Expensive Midterm Elections and Their Billionaire Backers" This analysis details the unprecedented scale of spending in the 2026 midterm elections, highlighting the key billionaire donors shaping the political landscape. Jeff Yass, founder of Susquehanna International Group, has contributed over $81 million, ranking third among individual donors behind George Soros ($102.6M) and Elon Musk ($84.8M). Yass is a major donor to Trump's MAGA Inc. and supports school choice and various candidates. Overall, federal committees have raised over $4.7 billion this cycle, with political ad spending projected to reach $10.8 billion. Republican-aligned groups are significantly out-raising their Democratic counterparts. "Dark money" from undisclosed sources continues to grow. The core stakes involve control of Congress and policy direction for Trump's final term. Donors are also motivated by specific issues: Sergey Brin and Chris Larsen are funding opposition to a proposed California wealth tax and supporting crypto-friendly policies. Other top donors include OpenAI's Greg Brockman and his wife Anna ($50M total to MAGA Inc. and an AI-focused PAC), Richard Uihlein ($45.3M to conservative causes), venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz (each over $44M to crypto/AI PACs and MAGA Inc.), Miriam Adelson ($42.6M to GOP leadership PACs), Paul Singer ($33.9M), and Diane Hendricks ($25.8M to MAGA Inc.). The article notes that the peak fundraising period is still ahead, with major primaries approaching.

marsbit1h ago

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

marsbit1h ago

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

"Anthropic Nears Trillion-Dollar IPO, Fueled by Explosive Growth and 2028 'Intelligence Explosion' Warning Anthropic is considering a deal valuing the AI company near $1 trillion, potentially leading to one of the largest IPOs ever and surpassing SpaceX. Its revenue has skyrocketed, with Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) reaching $45 billion in May 2026—a 500% increase in just five months. This vertical growth curve is attributed to its key products, Claude Code and Cowork, dominating AI coding and enterprise collaboration. Beyond commercial success, co-founder Jack Clark issued a pivotal warning in an interview: there is a greater than 50% chance that by the end of 2028, AI systems will achieve recursive self-improvement—the ability to autonomously build a 'better version' of themselves, initiating an 'intelligence explosion.' This prophecy underpins the company's astronomical valuation, as the market prices in the potential for transformative and disruptive AI. Further signaling its ambition, Anthropic formed a $1.5 billion joint venture with Goldman Sachs and Blackstone, aiming to disrupt traditional consulting firms like McKinsey by deploying Claude AI for complex strategic work. This move tests AI's capacity to replace high-level cognitive labor, a precursor to its predicted autonomous evolution. The narrative presents a dual future: unprecedented economic opportunity alongside significant risks like economic restructuring and security threats. Anthropic's meteoric rise and Clark's 2028 prediction frame the coming years as a countdown to a potential technological singularity."

marsbit2h ago

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片