Bitcoin drops below $90k as $708.9m crypto liquidations hit leveraged longs

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Bitcoin fell below the key $90,000 level on January 21st, extending a broader pullback. The drop was accompanied by a significant wave of liquidations totaling $708.88 million over 24 hours, with long positions accounting for the vast majority at $648.78 million. This indicates the market was positioned for a bounce but was caught offside by the decline. The price decline pushed Bitcoin's 12-hour RSI to -33.7, signaling weakening momentum. Market structure suggests the move has entered a fragile phase. While bounces can occur, they are likely to be volatile. The aggressive deleveraging from the liquidation flush may reduce near-term selling pressure. The market's next key test is whether Bitcoin can reclaim the $90,000 level.

Bitcoin fell below $90,000 on 21 January. The drop extends a broader pullback that a sharp wave of forced unwinds has accompanied across the crypto derivatives market.

On the 12-hour timeframe, Bitcoin traded as low as $89,162 before settling around $89,368, down roughly 1.9% on the session. The move also pushed the Relative Strength Index [RSI] to -33.7. This level typically signals weakening momentum after sustained selling pressure.

A leverage flush dominated by long liquidations

Liquidation data showed the sell-off was driven largely by long-side leverage being taken out.

According to CoinGlass figures, total liquidations reached $708.88m over the past 24 hours. $648.78m was from long positions versus $60.09m from shorts.

Over the past 12 hours, liquidations totaled $466.40m, again skewed heavily toward longs [$422.68m] compared with shorts [$43.72m].

CoinGlass also reported that 166,432 traders were liquidated during the 24-hour window.

This kind of imbalance typically points to a market that was positioned for continuation or a bounce. However, it was caught offside as spot prices pushed lower, triggering cascading stop-outs.

Bitcoin leads the downturn as traders watch key levels

With Bitcoin losing the $90k handle, attention is likely to shift to whether price can quickly reclaim that psychological level, or whether sellers continue to defend it on any rebound.

From a market structure perspective, the combination of a sub-$90k print and RSI near the low-30s suggests the move has entered a more fragile phase.

The bounces can occur, but are often volatile and sensitive to headline-driven risk sentiment and funding positioning.

Still, the clearest signal from the data is positioning. The liquidation skew shows the market has been deleveraging aggressively. This can sometimes reduce near-term sell pressure once forced liquidations slow.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin breaking below $90k coincided with a leverage reset, with roughly $708.9m liquidated in 24 hours and longs taking the bulk of the hit.
  • With RSI near -34 on the 12-hour chart, BTC is weakening at support, making the next moves around $90k a key indicator of sentiment and positioning.

Related Questions

QWhat was the key price level that Bitcoin fell below on 21 January, and what was its lowest trading point?

ABitcoin fell below the key psychological level of $90,000, trading as low as $89,162 on the 12-hour timeframe before settling around $89,368.

QWhat was the total value of crypto liquidations in the 24-hour period, and how much of that came from long positions?

AThe total value of crypto liquidations was $708.88 million over the past 24 hours, with $648.78 million of that coming from long positions.

QWhat does the RSI level of -33.7 on the 12-hour timeframe typically signal for Bitcoin's momentum?

AAn RSI level of -33.7 typically signals weakening momentum after a period of sustained selling pressure.

QAccording to the article, what does the heavy skew of liquidations toward long positions indicate about market positioning?

AThe heavy skew toward long liquidations indicates that the market was positioned for a price continuation or bounce but was caught offside as spot prices fell, triggering cascading stop-outs.

QWhat is the potential implication of the market's aggressive deleveraging, as shown by the liquidation data?

AAggressive deleveraging can sometimes reduce near-term sell pressure once the wave of forced liquidations slows down.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit7m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit7m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1h ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片