Argentina Bans Polymarket Over Illegal Gambling Concerns Following Colombia

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-17Last updated on 2026-03-17

Abstract

Argentina has blocked the prediction market platform Polymarket following a court ruling in Buenos Aires that declared its operations illegal under the country's gambling regulations. Authorities have directed internet service providers and app stores to restrict access to the platform. Officials raised concerns over the use of cryptocurrencies for betting and the lack of user identity checks, which could allow minors to participate. The decision follows similar action taken by Colombia, where Polymarket was also classified as an illegal gambling operation for failing to meet licensing requirements. The case reflects growing global regulatory scrutiny of crypto-based prediction markets, which are increasingly being treated as gambling platforms due to their structure and potential risks to market integrity.

Argentina’s authorities have blocked Polymarket across the country after a ruling by a Buenos Aires court. It declared that it operated illegally and outside the country’s legal framework and regulations regarding gambling. The country’s authorities have asked ENACOM to impose a blockade against Polymarket by internet service providers. The limited access to mobile applications across the country. They have also asked app stores to remove Polymarket applications to prevent users from accessing them.

It was also determined that the platform enabled users to place bets using cryptocurrencies. And the traditional forms of payment in an easy manner. There were also concerns raised by officials regarding the lack of verification measures for the identity of users. This may lead minors to indulge in illegal betting activities. Complaints from local gambling organizations prompted legal action against the platform’s operations.

Regulatory Concerns and Regional Crackdown Expand

Investigations were conducted regarding suspicious trading activities related to inflation prediction markets. This have recently received significant regulatory interest from financial oversight organizations. Reports have been received about unusual betting patterns that have sparked concerns about a potential case. The officials have studied the trading and have observed that some behaviors may have suggested a potential information advantage for some groups in the entire system. This may have compromised the overall integrity and transparency in the current decentralized prediction markets operating globally.

It is worth noting that the authorities concluded that the platform operated like an online betting system. The authorities noted that prediction markets generally take a similar form to gambling structures, in which users of the platforms make predictions about real-world events in order to obtain financial rewards. The classification of prediction markets as gambling structures increases the need for stricter regulation and enforcement of the existing gambling laws.

Argentina’s decision comes in the wake of a similar decision made by the Colombian authorities, banning Polymarket from operating within their jurisdiction since it did not comply with the licensing requirements. The Colombian authorities classified the prediction platform as an illegal gambling platform and asked all the internet service providers within the country to block the platform immediately. The case is a testament to the increasing global scrutiny of crypto-based platforms that take a similar form to gambling and trading mechanisms.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Polymarket Users Threaten Journalist Over Iran Missile Report Dispute

TagsArgentinaBlockchainCRYPTO GAMBLINGCryptocurrencyexchangegamblingPolymarket

Related Questions

QWhy did Argentina block Polymarket?

AArgentina blocked Polymarket because a Buenos Aires court ruled that it operated illegally outside the country's legal gambling framework and regulations.

QWhat actions did Argentine authorities take against Polymarket?

AAuthorities asked ENACOM to impose an ISP blockade, restricted access to its applications, and requested app stores to remove Polymarket's apps.

QWhat were the specific concerns officials had about Polymarket platform?

AOfficials raised concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies for betting, lack of user identity verification, and the risk of minors engaging in illegal betting activities.

QHow did Argentina classify Polymarket's operations?

AArgentina classified Polymarket as an online betting system, noting that prediction markets function similarly to gambling structures where users predict real-world events for financial rewards.

QWhich other country recently took similar action against Polymarket?

AColombia recently banned Polymarket for operating without complying with licensing requirements, classifying it as an illegal gambling platform.

Related Reads

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit52m ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit52m ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbit54m ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbit54m ago

Bitwise: Bullish on Bitcoin's Performance in the Second Half of the Year, AI and Regulation Will Spark a New Altcoin Season

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan and Research Lead Ryan Rasmussen express strong bullish sentiment on Bitcoin's long-term prospects, suggesting that its $1 million price target may be too conservative. They argue Bitcoin serves a dual role: as digital gold and a potential global settlement asset, especially amid declining trust in traditional monetary systems. Despite a weak Q1 2026 where nearly all crypto assets and prices saw double-digit declines, the analysts remain optimistic due to strong forward-looking catalysts, including institutional adoption via Bitcoin ETFs from major firms like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. Geopolitical instability, such as Iran’s mention of using Bitcoin for international payments, increases the value of Bitcoin’s “out-of-the-money call option” as a non-political, global settlement currency. This enhances its appeal beyond a mere store of value. . Additionally, Hougan highlights that a clearer regulatory token framework under current SEC leadership, combined with AI efficiency gains and high-performance blockchains, could fuel a new “altseason” by late 2026. This may lead to a wave of legitimate, value-capturing token projects, unlike the earlier ICO boom. . Bitwise also announced an Avalanche ETF, citing its unique architecture and rapid growth in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, which has surged 10x to nearly $30 billion in two years. The firm believes Layer 1 blockchains are still early in their growth cycle, with significant potential ahead.

marsbit1h ago

Bitwise: Bullish on Bitcoin's Performance in the Second Half of the Year, AI and Regulation Will Spark a New Altcoin Season

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片