Altcoin season index sits at 32: ‘Still in the gutter,’ believes expert

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

In a recent analysis, CoinGecko highlighted that the altcoin market remains in a prolonged slump, with the Altcoin Season Index at 32, indicating continued Bitcoin dominance. Historically, capital rotated from Bitcoin to Ethereum and then to altcoins after Bitcoin reached a new all-time high (ATH). However, this cycle has diverged due to the influence of Bitcoin ETFs approved in 2024, which have concentrated institutional investment in Bitcoin rather than spreading to altcoins. Despite Bitcoin hitting an ATH of $126,000 in October 2025, altcoins have underperformed. Some in the crypto community anticipate an altseason, but key indicators suggest otherwise. Bitcoin's dominance remains strong, and altcoins like Dogecoin, Solana, and Cardano have not trended positively. Santiment’s Weighted Sentiment analysis shows Bitcoin as the only cryptocurrency with positive sentiment, while altcoins linger in negative territory. Additionally, the RSI for most tokens, including Bitcoin, is below the neutral 50-level, reflecting bearish market conditions. On-chain data remains pessimistic, contradicting optimistic analyst predictions for an imminent altseason.

In a recent YouTube stream, data aggregator CoinGecko noted that altcoins have remained in a slump for a sustained period of time.

The platform also analyzed previous cycles, highlighting a recurring pattern—capital always rotates from Bitcoin into Ethereum and then into other altcoins once Bitcoin hits a new all-time high (ATH).

Bitcoin’s all-time high of $126,000 has come and gone, but altcoins are still in the gutter.

However, the current market isn’t following past patterns. Bitcoin reached its ATH of $126,000 back in October 2025, yet altcoins have still failed to outperform.

This change in pattern is notably because of the approval of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other related products approved in 2024. For perspective, in the new cycle, money is coming in, but mostly from institutions via ETFs, and “tends to stay concentrated in Bitcoin.”

So, with the biggest concentration lying in the hands of Spot Bitcoin ETFs, the altseason does appear like a far-fetched dream.

CoinGecko brought up this discrepancy, noting,

It doesn’t trickle down into smaller tokens the way retail flows used to.

The weight of the situation

The CoinMarketCap Altcoin Index, sitting at 32 at the time of reporting, further suggests that the Bitcoin season is still in action.

Source: CoinMarketCap

However, others in the crypto community still believe that the altcoin season is “just around the corner.”

Source: X

If the altcoin season is actually about to happen, then Bitcoin dominance needs to weaken. Moreover, the top 10 altcoins trending in 90 days should include big names like Dogecoin, Solana, and Cardano.

Source: CoinMarketCap

This was further confirmed by Santiment’s Weighted Sentiment analysis. The chart clearly shows that Bitcoin is the only token with positive Weighted Sentiment, whereas other altcoins are below the 50-level mark in the negative zone.

Source: Santiment

But the RSI of all the tokens, including Bitcoin, lying below the 50-level mark, aka the neutral level, suggests that the overall market sentiment is in the sellers’ hands.

Source: Santiment

This was further confirmed by AMBCrypto’s recent analysis, which also suggests that analysts are in favor of an altseason, but the on-chain data looks pessimistic.


Final Summary

  • CoinGecko believes that altcoins are in the “gutter” after Bitcoin hit an ATH back in October 2025.
  • However, hope for an upcoming altseason remains strong among investors.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current state of the altcoin market according to the article?

AThe altcoin market is in a prolonged slump, with the Altcoin Season Index sitting at 32, indicating it is 'still in the gutter' and has failed to outperform Bitcoin.

QWhat key factor does the article cite for the change in the traditional market pattern where capital rotates from Bitcoin to altcoins?

AThe approval of Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other related products in 2024 is the key factor. Institutional money flowing in via ETFs tends to stay concentrated in Bitcoin and does not trickle down into smaller altcoins like retail flows used to.

QWhat does the CoinMarketCap Altcoin Index value of 32 suggest about the current market season?

AAn Altcoin Index value of 32 suggests that the market is still in a 'Bitcoin season,' meaning Bitcoin is dominating the market performance and altcoins are not outperforming it.

QAccording to the article, what two conditions need to be met for an altcoin season to be considered happening?

AFor an altcoin season to happen, Bitcoin's dominance needs to weaken, and the top 10 altcoins trending over 90 days should include major names like Dogecoin, Solana, and Cardano.

QWhat does the Weighted Sentiment analysis from Santiment, as mentioned in the article, reveal about market sentiment for Bitcoin versus altcoins?

ASantiment's Weighted Sentiment analysis shows that Bitcoin is the only token with a positive sentiment score, while all other altcoins are in the negative zone below the 50-level mark.

Related Reads

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit8m ago

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit8m ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1h ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1h ago

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit1h ago

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片