‘Adapt or die’- SEC approves Nasdaq plan to trade tokenized securities

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-19Last updated on 2026-03-19

Abstract

The SEC has approved Nasdaq's pilot program to trade tokenized securities, allowing the exchange to test blockchain-based versions of stocks and ETFs on a unified platform. The program will initially include high-volume assets like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs. Unlike many existing tokenized products, Nasdaq’s tokens will grant holders the same legal rights as traditional shareholders, including the same CUSIP numbers and trading symbols. This move is seen as a major disruptive force in asset management, with experts comparing its potential impact to that of ETFs on mutual funds. The approval accelerates Nasdaq’s partnership with Kraken and aims to enable 24/7 trading and attract offshore investors. The tokenized securities market has already surpassed $1 billion, with significant growth in early 2026.

New York-based Nasdaq Exchange has gotten the green light to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities.

The SEC approval would allow the traditional exchange to test trading of the blockchain-based version of stocks under its Depository Trust Company (DTC) pilot program.

Both traditional stocks and these tokenized variants will trade on the same unified platform. The program will initially target high-volume ETFs and stocks.

This would include the constituents of the Russell 1000 Index (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, etc.). Additionally, ETFs such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100 will fall within the early asset scope.

Community reactions

For ETF analyst Nate Geraci, the SEC approval would set the stage for a massive disruption by the tokenization boom.

For him, the writing is on the wall: the top regulator, the SEC, major exchanges (Nasdaq, NYSE), and the world’s largest asset managers (BlackRock and Fidelity) are all in on tokenization.

He added,

Tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds...Will basically be adapt or die a slow death.

Nasdaq initially sought SEC approval for tokenized stocks in September 2025. But its proposal was wholly different from the current tokenized securities on the market, such as xStocks offered by Kraken and Backed Finance.

Unlike most current offerings, including leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq pushed for its tokenized securities to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. And the SEC acknowledged this.

A tokenized share of a DTC Eligible Security must be fungible with, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol with, and afford its shareholders the same rights and privileges as a share of an equivalent class of the traditional security for it to trade on Nasdaq.

Nasdaq’s tokenization plans

That said, the SEC’s green light will accelerate Nasdaq’s recent partnership with Kraken to distribute tokenized securities by xStocks.

This integration may likely be tied to the DTC pilot and eventually accord xStock holders similar legal rights as traditional shareholders.

The end goal? Ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market.

And the appetite for these products is incredible. So far, the tokenized segment has crossed $1B, and over $300 million of the market cap was added in Q1 2026 alone.

Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • The approval of Nasdaq’s tokenized securities trading is a major unfolding disruption that would force other traditional players to pivot, per an ETF expert.
  • SEC clarified that Nasdaq’s tokenized stocks and ETFs will offer similar rights as traditional securities.

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's approval for Nasdaq's pilot program?

AThe SEC's approval allows Nasdaq to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities, which are blockchain-based versions of stocks. This program will enable both traditional stocks and their tokenized variants to trade on the same unified platform, initially targeting high-volume ETFs and stocks like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

QAccording to ETF analyst Nate Geraci, how disruptive will tokenization be to asset management?

ANate Geraci believes tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds. He stated that it will force traditional players to 'adapt or die a slow death,' indicating a significant transformation in the industry.

QHow do Nasdaq's tokenized securities differ from current offerings like xStocks from Kraken and Backed Finance?

AUnlike current offerings such as leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq's tokenized securities are designed to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. The SEC requires that tokenized shares must be fungible, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol, and afford shareholders the same rights and privileges as traditional securities.

QWhat is the end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans, as mentioned in the article?

AThe end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans is to ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market. This initiative aims to expand market accessibility and provide continuous trading opportunities.

QWhat is the current market size of the tokenized segment, and how much growth was seen in Q1 2026?

AThe tokenized segment has crossed $1 billion in market size. In Q1 2026 alone, over $300 million in market capitalization was added, indicating significant growth and appetite for these products.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报24m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报24m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News41m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News41m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片