‘A decent 60% chance’ – Galaxy Research weighs crypto bill ahead of Jan. 15

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

Galaxy Research estimates a 60% chance that the crypto market structure bill will advance, with a key Senate Banking Committee markup scheduled for January 15. Democrats are pushing for stricter DeFi regulations, including sanctions compliance, Treasury authority, and a $200 million fundraising cap for issuers. While some view these demands as reasonable, unresolved issues like stablecoin yields and developer protections remain. The 2026 elections could further impact the bill's progress, as political dynamics may delay it. Prediction site Kalshi gives the bill a 79% chance of passing before 2027, but only 49% before May.

Galaxy Research is optimistic that the crypto market structure bill could advance, despite a few contentious issues.

Following the recent bipartisan Senate meeting, Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there was still a “decent 60%” chance that the bill would be passed.

However, he noted that the odds could change depending on the outcome of the Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for the 15th of January.

“Republicans are pushing for the markup...Unclear if the two sides can come together and make that bipartisan, as plenty of issues are still outstanding.”

Will Democrats’ demand stall the bill?

Thorn added that the Democrats maintained their stance on DeFi regulation with three key requests from the Republicans.

First, all front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S sanctions. In other words, the platforms must block out sanctioned entities, such as North Korea, or face legal liability.

Additionally, DeFi exchanges must grant “special measures” authority to the treasury, and U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for “non-decentralized” DeFi.

Put differently, the Democrats called for proper DeFi regulation, a stance that delayed the previous markup deadline in September 2025.

Whether it will become another deal-breaker on the 15th of January remains to be seen.

But moderate Democrat and Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto said she “definitely” expects a markup next week. She added,

“We’re still having conversations, but it’s been very productive — open on both sides to working through all of the issues.”

The party also asked for a $200 million cap on the amount issuers can raise and additional investor protections.

Some crypto supporters like venture capitalist Nic Carter viewed the above demands as “pretty reasonable.”

But the stablecoin yield, ethics targeting the Donald Trump family, and software developer protection were key unresolved issues.

In fact, regarding the stablecoin yield, the crypto industry has vowed not to back down, calling it a “national security” issue as China moves to undercut U.S. dominance in the sector.

U.S elections factor

But the 2026 elections could affect the bill’s momentum.

According to investment bank TD Cowen, the Democrats aren’t incentivized to swiftly pass the bill as they believe they may regain control after the November elections. In fact, Trump is worried that he could be impeached if Republicans lose House control.

Jaret Seiberg, managing director of TD Cowen’s Washington research arm, noted in a recent client update that Trump’s conflict of interest topic could delay it by three years.

“We do not believe Democrats would accept this deal unless it also pushed the rest of the bill out three years.”

That said, the overall odds of passage per prediction site Kalshi were 79% before 2027 and 49% before May.


Final Thoughts

  • The Senate Banking Committee is set to markup the crypto market structure bill on January 15, despite Democrats’ hardline stance on DeFi.
  • The chance of the bill’s passage was nearly 50/50 before May, but elections could impact its momentum.

Related Questions

QWhat is the probability that the crypto market structure bill will be passed, according to Galaxy Research's Alex Thorn?

AAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there is a 'decent 60%' chance that the bill will be passed.

QWhat are the three key demands from Democrats regarding DeFi regulation?

AThe Democrats' three key demands are: 1) All front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S. sanctions and block sanctioned entities. 2) DeFi exchanges must grant 'special measures' authority to the treasury. 3) U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for 'non-decentralized' DeFi.

QWhat event on January 15th could change the odds of the bill's passage?

AThe Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for January 15th, could change the odds of the bill's passage.

QAccording to the article, what is a major unresolved issue that the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on?

AA major unresolved issue is the stablecoin yield, which the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on, calling it a 'national security' issue.

QHow could the 2026 U.S. elections impact the momentum of the crypto bill?

AThe 2026 elections could impact the bill's momentum because Democrats may not be incentivized to pass it swiftly if they believe they will regain control after the November elections. A conflict of interest topic related to Trump could potentially delay the bill by three years.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片