‘A decent 60% chance’ – Galaxy Research weighs crypto bill ahead of Jan. 15

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

Galaxy Research estimates a 60% chance that the crypto market structure bill will advance, with a key Senate Banking Committee markup scheduled for January 15. Democrats are pushing for stricter DeFi regulations, including sanctions compliance, Treasury authority, and a $200 million fundraising cap for issuers. While some view these demands as reasonable, unresolved issues like stablecoin yields and developer protections remain. The 2026 elections could further impact the bill's progress, as political dynamics may delay it. Prediction site Kalshi gives the bill a 79% chance of passing before 2027, but only 49% before May.

Galaxy Research is optimistic that the crypto market structure bill could advance, despite a few contentious issues.

Following the recent bipartisan Senate meeting, Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there was still a “decent 60%” chance that the bill would be passed.

However, he noted that the odds could change depending on the outcome of the Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for the 15th of January.

“Republicans are pushing for the markup...Unclear if the two sides can come together and make that bipartisan, as plenty of issues are still outstanding.”

Will Democrats’ demand stall the bill?

Thorn added that the Democrats maintained their stance on DeFi regulation with three key requests from the Republicans.

First, all front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S sanctions. In other words, the platforms must block out sanctioned entities, such as North Korea, or face legal liability.

Additionally, DeFi exchanges must grant “special measures” authority to the treasury, and U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for “non-decentralized” DeFi.

Put differently, the Democrats called for proper DeFi regulation, a stance that delayed the previous markup deadline in September 2025.

Whether it will become another deal-breaker on the 15th of January remains to be seen.

But moderate Democrat and Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto said she “definitely” expects a markup next week. She added,

“We’re still having conversations, but it’s been very productive — open on both sides to working through all of the issues.”

The party also asked for a $200 million cap on the amount issuers can raise and additional investor protections.

Some crypto supporters like venture capitalist Nic Carter viewed the above demands as “pretty reasonable.”

But the stablecoin yield, ethics targeting the Donald Trump family, and software developer protection were key unresolved issues.

In fact, regarding the stablecoin yield, the crypto industry has vowed not to back down, calling it a “national security” issue as China moves to undercut U.S. dominance in the sector.

U.S elections factor

But the 2026 elections could affect the bill’s momentum.

According to investment bank TD Cowen, the Democrats aren’t incentivized to swiftly pass the bill as they believe they may regain control after the November elections. In fact, Trump is worried that he could be impeached if Republicans lose House control.

Jaret Seiberg, managing director of TD Cowen’s Washington research arm, noted in a recent client update that Trump’s conflict of interest topic could delay it by three years.

“We do not believe Democrats would accept this deal unless it also pushed the rest of the bill out three years.”

That said, the overall odds of passage per prediction site Kalshi were 79% before 2027 and 49% before May.


Final Thoughts

  • The Senate Banking Committee is set to markup the crypto market structure bill on January 15, despite Democrats’ hardline stance on DeFi.
  • The chance of the bill’s passage was nearly 50/50 before May, but elections could impact its momentum.

Related Questions

QWhat is the probability that the crypto market structure bill will be passed, according to Galaxy Research's Alex Thorn?

AAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there is a 'decent 60%' chance that the bill will be passed.

QWhat are the three key demands from Democrats regarding DeFi regulation?

AThe Democrats' three key demands are: 1) All front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S. sanctions and block sanctioned entities. 2) DeFi exchanges must grant 'special measures' authority to the treasury. 3) U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for 'non-decentralized' DeFi.

QWhat event on January 15th could change the odds of the bill's passage?

AThe Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for January 15th, could change the odds of the bill's passage.

QAccording to the article, what is a major unresolved issue that the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on?

AA major unresolved issue is the stablecoin yield, which the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on, calling it a 'national security' issue.

QHow could the 2026 U.S. elections impact the momentum of the crypto bill?

AThe 2026 elections could impact the bill's momentum because Democrats may not be incentivized to pass it swiftly if they believe they will regain control after the November elections. A conflict of interest topic related to Trump could potentially delay the bill by three years.

Related Reads

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight News8m ago

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight News8m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit26m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit26m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit39m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片