NEAR Co-Founder Proposes Creation of Protocol Sovereign Fund

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-04Last updated on 2026-08-04

Abstract

NEAR co-founder Ilya Polosukhin has proposed creating a sovereign protocol fund to support ecosystem development through targeted funding. The fund aims to improve the project's sustainability, moving away from the current model where most L1 blockchains, including NEAR, pay for network security via token inflation, diluting non-staking holders. Inspired by sovereign wealth funds in countries like Singapore and Norway, the NEAR fund would use protocol revenue and treasury assets to generate yield, covering security costs and other public goods, ultimately aiming to lower inflation and potentially transition to a fixed token supply model. The initial phase would involve allocating around 30 million NEAR (approximately $50 million) to the fund. It would use protocol revenue to buy back NEAR and invest in yield-generating protocols. Profits would fund ecosystem initiatives like validator support and MPC provider payments. Unlike traditional sovereign funds holding fiat assets, this fund would primarily hold NEAR tokens, introducing additional risk that Polosukhin believes can be mitigated through diversified yield strategies. Token holders could participate in the fund's returns via the existing House of Stake delegation mechanism. The launch is planned to be gradual, with checkpoints to verify the model's effectiveness before allocating more capital. Polosukhin has opened the proposal for a two-week community discussion, emphasizing that final parameters will be determined by...

$NEAR project co-founder Ilya Polosukhin has published a proposal on the official forum to create a protocol sovereign fund. It is intended to support ecosystem development through targeted funding.

In his post, Polosukhin highlighted the work done to ensure the project's sustainability: reducing inflation, the mechanism for redistributing $NEAR Intents fees into $NEAR buybacks, and launching AI-inference staking.

Earlier we examined in detail the direction this project is moving in:

Polosukhin believes that creating a sovereign fund is the natural next step. As examples, he cited countries like Singapore and Norway: their sovereign funds use revenues from cyclical sources — oil, land sales — to invest in income-generating assets, and the profits are used for state needs while preserving the fund's "principal."

According to Polosukhin, today, the security of most L1 blockchain networks, including $NEAR, is paid for through inflation — that is, the constant minting of new tokens, which dilutes the share of non-staking holders.

The sovereign fund is designed to gradually replace this model: instead of paying validators directly from issuance, the investment income from the fund will cover security costs and other network public goods, while simultaneously allowing for a reduction in inflation.

Polosukhin separately explained why this particular approach was chosen over simple token burning: burning only temporarily compensates for inflation and does not create a permanent source of funding, whereas funds invested in yield-generating protocols continue to generate income for the ecosystem.

How the initiative will be implemented

It is assumed that the sovereign fund will gain control over the project's treasury, as well as future protocol revenue. At the initial stage, its balance will hold about 30 million $NEAR — at the current exchange rate, this is approximately $50 million.

Subsequently, the fund will buy $NEAR with incoming revenue and place assets in yield-generating protocols. The generated profit is planned to be directed towards supporting the ecosystem — in particular, the validator support program and paying MPC providers.

An important nuance: unlike classical sovereign funds, which typically hold liquid fiat assets, the $NEAR fund will hold the $NEAR token itself — this adds an additional risk to the model, which Polosukhin expects to compensate for by diversifying the methods of generating yield.

Over time, the fund's "principal" will grow through additional allocations — both from protocol revenue and gradually from issuance. In theory, this could eventually allow $NEAR to transition to a fixed token supply model. $NEAR holders will also be able to participate in the fund's yield through the existing delegation mechanism in the House of Stake.

This is the first phase of the initiative: Polosukhin emphasizes that the launch will be phased, with checkpoints to verify the model is working before more funds are directed to the fund.

The $NEAR co-founder invited ecosystem participants to discuss the initiative over two weeks, stressing that this is a proposal, not a final solution — the final parameters of the fund are to be developed by the community, including validators and token holders via the House of Stake.

Related Questions

QWho proposed the creation of a Sovereign Protocol Fund for NEAR and what was the medium used?

AIlya Polosukhin, the co-founder of the NEAR project, proposed the creation of a Sovereign Protocol Fund by publishing the suggestion on the project's official forum.

QWhat is the primary purpose of the proposed NEAR Sovereign Protocol Fund?

AThe primary purpose of the proposed fund is to support the development of the NEAR ecosystem through targeted funding and to gradually replace the network's security model, which is currently paid for via inflation (token issuance).

QWhy did Ilya Polosukhin argue against simply burning tokens as an alternative to the Sovereign Fund?

APolosukhin argued that token burning only compensates for inflation temporarily and does not create a permanent source of funding, whereas assets invested in yield-generating protocols can continuously generate income for the ecosystem.

QWhat is the initial planned size of the Sovereign Fund and what assets will it primarily hold?

AThe initial balance of the fund is planned to be around 30 million NEAR tokens, worth approximately $50 million at the current rate. Importantly, the fund will primarily hold the NEAR token itself, unlike traditional sovereign funds that hold liquid fiat assets.

QHow can NEAR token holders potentially benefit from the proposed Sovereign Fund's performance?

ANEAR token holders will be able to participate in the fund's yield through the existing delegation mechanism in the House of Stake.

Related Reads

After Memes, Solana Foundation's 'Survival Roadmap'

**Title:** After Memes, Solana Foundation's "Survival Roadmap" **Summary:** Solana Foundation's recent hiring spree for senior roles in stablecoins, AI, Asian institutional growth, and DeFi signals a strategic pivot away from its meme-driven past. This move comes as the blockchain faces a 43% quarterly drop in real economic value and declining application revenue, despite maintaining high network activity. While meme platforms like Pump.fun still dominate fee generation, new demand is emerging in tokenized equities (with $5.8B volume in Q2, a 114% increase) and institutional adoption (7 global systemically important banks are now active on Solana). The foundation's new hires aim to bridge a critical gap: transforming this growing non-speculative demand into sustainable, fee-generating activity. The stablecoin lead seeks "step-change growth" for a sector lagging behind competitors. The Asia-focused roles aim to convert institutional interest into concrete pipelines, leveraging upcoming network upgrades for millisecond settlement. The AI ecosystem role is tied to new stablecoin payment channels for AI agents, a nascent but promising revenue stream. The core challenge is clear: reduce reliance on volatile meme trading income and successfully monetize the rising institutional and real-world asset activity. The success of this "survival roadmap" will be measured by whether projects from these new focus areas can break into Solana's top revenue rankings, displacing the current meme-centric leaders.

marsbit25m ago

After Memes, Solana Foundation's 'Survival Roadmap'

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片