Stablecoin boom turns mainstream as illicit use plunges — and retail is driving the shift

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

Stablecoin adoption reached a significant inflection point in 2025, with transfer volumes surging to over $4 trillion, marking one of the strongest growth periods on record. Despite this expansion, illicit activity involving stablecoins fell by approximately 60% year-over-year, according to TRM Labs. This decline is attributed to enhanced global enforcement and the rise of regulated, fully backed issuers. A key shift is the growing dominance of retail users—rather than institutions—driving adoption. Factors include the return of U.S. retail investors, increased usage in emerging markets for savings and payments, and the use of stablecoins as a hedge against inflation. Stablecoins are increasingly integrated into everyday finance, such as remittances, cross-border transactions, and small payments, moving from speculative tools to core financial infrastructure. This trend signals a healthier, more mature market with expanding legitimate use cases and reduced illicit activity, positioning stablecoins as a major global payment rail in the coming decade.

Global stablecoin adoption hit an inflection point in 2025. According to TRM Labs’ latest Crypto Adoption and Stablecoin Usage Report, the asset class is now growing at its fastest pace since 2021 — yet illicit activity tied to stablecoins has collapsed to multi-year lows.

The findings reveal a market that is expanding rapidly, formalizing quickly, and increasingly powered by retail users rather than institutions.

Illicit stablecoin activity collapses even as volumes surge

Stablecoin transfer volume rose to more than $4 trillion in 2025, marking one of the strongest growth periods on record.

Despite that surge, illicit use of stablecoins fell by roughly 60% year-over-year, according to TRM.

This trend contrasts sharply with prior cycles, when rising stablecoin usage often moved in lockstep with increases in fraud, sanctions evasion, and money-laundering flows.

TRM attributes the decline to two structural changes: enhanced global enforcement and the rise of regulated, fully backed issuers.

As more jurisdictions bring stablecoin frameworks online — including the EU through MiCA and regions like Hong Kong, Singapore, the UAE, and the UK — illicit actors have fewer places to operate without scrutiny.

Retail — not institutions — is powering the 2025 crypto rebound

One of the report’s most striking findings is that retail traders drove most of the growth in crypto activity this year, reversing the institutional-first cycle of 2022–2024.

TRM highlights strong user acquisition and rising trading volumes across consumer platforms, supported by:

  • U.S. retail returning to the market after two years on the sidelines
  • A sharp rise in emerging-market usage, particularly for savings and payments
  • Stablecoins replacing local currencies in inflation-hit economies

This shift places stablecoins at the center of a more grassroots revival, where individuals use digital dollars for daily commerce, cross-border transactions, and value storage — not just speculative trading.

The “everyday finance” phase arrives

Stablecoins now underpin much of global crypto activity, and their use cases are widening. Retail users increasingly prefer stablecoins for remittances, small payments, and as a hedge against unstable domestic currencies.

Meanwhile, fintech platforms and payment intermediaries are integrating stablecoins at record speed, expanding legitimate on-chain transaction flows.

Because stablecoins operate across open networks, adoption in one region accelerates activity elsewhere — creating a reinforcing global feedback loop.

TRM describes this moment as a “transition phase,” where stablecoins move from speculative crypto infrastructure into core financial infrastructure for everyday users.

A cleaner market signals a more mature cycle

The combination of falling illicit flows and rising retail participation points to a market becoming structurally healthier.

Stablecoins are no longer seen as opaque, high-risk liquidity tools. Instead, they are becoming regulated, traceable, widely used instruments that appeal to both consumers and compliant institutions.

The report suggests that this dynamic will shape the direction of crypto heading into 2026.

If retail demand continues to expand and regulated issuers remain dominant, stablecoins could become one of the most important global payment rails of the next decade.


Final Thoughts

  • Stablecoin usage is accelerating on a global scale, while illicit activity is dropping sharply, signaling a more mature and regulated market.
  • Retail demand—rather than institutional capital—is now driving the adoption of stablecoins, reshaping the growth trajectory of the crypto industry heading into 2026.

Related Reads

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

GitHub is facing an unprecedented crisis, marked by a massive exodus of developers and severe operational failures. The tipping point came when Mitchell Hashimoto, creator of Ghostty and an 18-year GitHub user, publicly severed ties, citing persistent platform outages that made serious work impossible. This departure highlights a broader pattern of user frustration. The platform's instability has drawn complaints from major corporate clients like Citibank and Intel, forcing Microsoft to issue substantial service credits. A critical incident last month saw an accidentally triggered, unreleased feature cause widespread repository rollbacks, erasing recent code changes and pushing enterprises to migrate. Security has catastrophically breached. In May 2026, hackers infiltrated over 3,800 of GitHub's internal repositories via a poisoned VS Code extension installed by a developer, leading to the attempted sale of core source code for $50,000. This follows the discovery of a critical zero-day vulnerability in March that threatened access to millions of repositories. Internally, GitHub's autonomy has collapsed. After the resignation of CEO Thomas Dohmke in mid-2025, Microsoft eliminated the CEO role, folding GitHub into its CoreAI division under the unpopular leadership of Jay Parikh. This triggered a talent drain, with key executives and engineers leaving. A disruptive migration of GitHub's infrastructure to Azure servers, pushed by CTO Vladimir Fedorov, is blamed for the recurring outages. Competitively, GitHub Copilot is under "existential threat" from superior AI coding tools like Cursor (now owned by SpaceX) and Claude Code, which offer more advanced contextual coding and automation. Ironically, Microsoft's own engineers reportedly preferred Claude Code, forcing management to revoke licenses. Financially, GitHub is a loss leader. Despite Copilot surpassing 4.7 million paid users and $3 billion in annual revenue, the AI inference costs for free services massively outstrip subscription income, hurting Microsoft's cloud margins. The recent shift from a flat fee to a pay-as-you-go model for Copilot has further alienated developers. The core question for Microsoft is whether a centralized code repository remains essential in the AI agent era. The erosion of trust, developer culture, and platform reliability threatens the very ecosystem Microsoft spent decades building.

marsbit49m ago

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

marsbit49m ago

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally release an "innovation exemption" framework this week. This framework would allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. The move, rooted in a deregulatory vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners earlier this year, could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain. This development poses a structural threat of "fragmentation" to traditional finance. Core concerns are liquidity fragmentation—where trading volume disperses across multiple blockchains and platforms, leading to price disparities and reduced market efficiency—and revenue fragmentation—where trading fees and intermediary income shift away from domestic exchanges to overseas or competing platforms. The report compares the traditional stock market to a monopolistic "supermarket." Tokenization enables countless "street stalls" to operate outside this system, threatening the exchange's dominance, diluting liquidity for large orders, and slicing into revenue streams. Evidence of this capital fragmentation is already emerging. On the same day the SEC signaled the framework, decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA (real-world asset) open interest hit a record $2.6 billion, driven by demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets. Traditional institutions face a dilemma: either collaborate to build tokenization infrastructure proactively or lobby regulators to block innovation. Regulators must balance controlling the pace of innovation with preventing domestic revenue from being captured by offshore platforms. Key future battles will revolve around defining shareholder rights for tokenized assets and regulating platforms that have grown in regulatory gray areas. In the digital asset era, inaction risks the permanent loss of long-held fee monopolies and financial leadership as capital continues to disperse.

marsbit1h ago

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

marsbit1h ago

A Comprehensive Analysis of On-Chain Pre-IPO: Why is the Pricing Power of SpaceX and OpenAI Moving On-Chain?

This podcast episode explores the rise of on-chain pre-IPO price discovery and trading, focusing on companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Key trends include the recent launch of a SpaceX pre-IPO perpetual contract on Hyperliquid, the secondary market trading of AI company shares, and a new partnership between Nasdaq Private Market and Polymarket. Dio Casares explains why AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic actively deny the legitimacy of secondary trades. Primary reasons are to protect their primary funding rounds (as secondary trades don't provide cash to the company) and to avoid complex legal and administrative responsibilities associated with settling these transactions. He argues that on-chain **derivatives** (like perpetuals) are a more viable solution than **tokenized spot markets**, as they better navigate U.S. regulatory holding period requirements, provide effective hedging, and avoid antagonizing the companies themselves by competing with their primary raises. The discussion covers the risks and methods of gaining pre-IPO exposure, from direct investments and SPVs to riskier, layered structures that can lead to legal complications and settlement issues. Casares also maps the landscape of key players, differentiating between traditional secondary brokers (like Forge, Hiive, and Setter) and on-chain derivatives protocols (like Trade.xyz/Ventuals on Hyperliquid) and tokenization platforms (often on Solana). He positions Patagon as a facilitator for access to private market deals but clarifies it avoids on-chain tokenization to maintain good relations with portfolio companies. Looking ahead, the convergence of a historic IPO pipeline (with potential trillion-dollar valuations), the 24/7 nature of crypto markets, and the strategic use of pre-market perpetuals as a "loss leader" suggest continued growth and competition in the on-chain pre-IPO space.

marsbit1h ago

A Comprehensive Analysis of On-Chain Pre-IPO: Why is the Pricing Power of SpaceX and OpenAI Moving On-Chain?

marsbit1h ago

Token Packages Are Here, Are Telecom Operators in a Hurry?

Major Chinese telecom operators are launching token-based AI computing packages, sparking public debate and highlighting a strategic shift amid slowing traditional revenue growth. In May, Shanghai Telecom introduced token plans (e.g., 9.9 RMB for 10 million tokens), quickly followed by nationwide offerings from China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom. While priced higher than major AI firms like DeepSeek, these packages allow users to access multiple AI models via API using their phone bills, similar to purchasing universal mobile data. The move reflects operators' anxiety as traditional voice, SMS, and data services stagnate. With revenue growth hitting multi-year lows in 2025, AI and computing power represent a critical new frontier. However, current C端 offerings, such as AI photo editing or virtual pets, are seen as non-essential and highlight operators' role as "pipes" or integrators rather than creators of compelling AI products. Beyond consumer packages, operators aim to become key infrastructure players in China’s national computing power network. They position themselves as the "power grid" delivering AI算力, leveraging their vast network of base stations to ensure low-latency, reliable coverage, especially for applications like autonomous driving. This infrastructure role, coupled with unified national调度, could make算力 a ubiquitous utility, driving new consumption scenarios even if mass adoption of token packages remains uncertain.

marsbit1h ago

Token Packages Are Here, Are Telecom Operators in a Hurry?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片