Crypto Regulation Rift Widens As Republicans Reject Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

A planned Senate Banking Committee markup of a crypto market structure bill has been postponed following Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's withdrawal of support. Republicans, led by Sen. Tim Scott, have raised significant concerns, arguing the bill may overreach and stifle innovation rather than protect investors. Key objections focus on provisions that could effectively ban tokenized equities, restrict DeFi, and grant broad government oversight. Despite the political standoff, cryptocurrency prices, including Bitcoin, remained stable. Industry representatives have threatened to withdraw support unless the bill is amended to foster innovation. Bipartisan negotiations continue behind closed doors with no set timeline for a Senate vote.

A planned Senate Banking Committee legislation markup has been postponed, as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has withdrawn his support for a market structure bill which seeks to codify federal regulations over crypto, stablecoins, and DeFi markets.

Based on reports, this unexpected withdrawal sharpened existing tensions between senators on debates of this bill and lawmakers who were trying to revamp critical phrases.

Republicans’ Concerns In Oversight

The Republicans in the Senate, under the leadership of Sen. Tim Scott, have strongly countered. They have expressed reservations about whether it is intended to help ordinary investors or just a few companies.

While some representatives expressed their concerns that broad oversight authority could stymie growth in addition to proposed net yields for stablecoins, reports have indicated that Republicans want more defined enforcement authority in opposition to broad regulatory language.

Bitcoin Unfazed By The Standoff

Despite the confusion, crypto prices remained firm. Bitcoin held its ground and climbed 1.5%. The top crypto asset retained its grip on the $96,000 level, while other top cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and USDT likewise notched similar gains in the last 24 hours, based on the latest market tracking figures.

Meanwhile, investors followed speeches and congress sessions. Market volatility heightened. Some investors opted to go to the sideline position as lobbyists and exchanges sought to shape the draft that will come next.

As a response to the new draft bill issued by the Senate, several industry representatives vocally objected to its provisions and expressed their belief that it could have a negative impact on tokenized equities and Decentralized Finance.

In fact, there are enough concerns in the blockchain sector raised by Armstrong, that he stated he would prefer to see no bill than see a bad bill passed, indicating that even some members of his industry agree with Republican concerns regarding possible overreach by Congress.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.25 trillion. Chart: TradingView

These industry groups said they will likely withdraw their support unless the Senate makes the necessary changes to allow for continued innovation and cross-border competition regarding blockchain technology.

Negotiations Continue To Take Place Behind Closed Doors

Some Senate leaders still want to move toward a committee vote, even though disagreement remains deep. Republican and Democratic legislators are currently negotiating or trading potential amendments on issues such as stablecoin legislation, DeFi protections and investor protections in an effort to reach an agreement on an acceptable version of the bill by both parties.

Democrats have identified a need to address regulatory issues regarding ethics, potential Money Laundering, and DeFi over-regulation as top priorities. On the other side of the aisle, the Republican Party continues to push for legislation that clearly defines the guardrails for federal regulators regarding blockchains.

As a result of ongoing negotiations, there is currently no set timeline for a Senate floor vote on the new legislation.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhy did Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdraw his support for the market structure bill?

ABrian Armstrong withdrew his support because the bill contained too many issues, including a de facto ban on tokenized equities, DeFi prohibitions, and provisions that would give the government unlimited access to financial data.

QWhat is the main concern of Republicans, led by Sen. Tim Scott, regarding the proposed crypto market structure bill?

ARepublicans are concerned that the bill may not be intended to help ordinary investors but only a few companies, and they want more defined enforcement authority rather than broad regulatory language that could stymie growth.

QHow did Bitcoin and the broader crypto market react to the legislative standoff?

ABitcoin held its ground and climbed 1.5%, maintaining its position around $96,000, while other top cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and USDT also saw similar gains in the last 24 hours.

QWhat are the key priorities for Democrats in the ongoing negotiations over the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have identified addressing regulatory issues regarding ethics, potential money laundering, and DeFi over-regulation as their top priorities.

QWhat is the current status of the Senate Banking Committee's timeline for a vote on the legislation?

AThere is currently no set timeline for a Senate floor vote on the new legislation due to ongoing negotiations and deep-seated disagreements between Republicans and Democrats.

Related Reads

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

The article discusses Backpack's innovative tokenomics model, which challenges conventional practices in the cryptocurrency industry. Unlike typical projects where teams and venture capitalists (VCs) receive immediate token allocations, Backpack allocates 100% of liquid tokens to users at TGE. The remaining 37.5% of tokens, traditionally reserved for teams and investors, are locked in a corporate vault and tied to the company’s eventual IPO. This structure ensures that internal stakeholders can only benefit after a successful IPO, with an additional one-year lock-up period post-IPO to prevent early sell-offs. Backpack’s approach emphasizes long-term alignment with user interests and project sustainability. The token distribution prioritizes community incentives, with 25% of tokens released at TGE to reward users and NFT holders. Future unlocks are tied to product milestones, ensuring that new token releases contribute more value to the ecosystem than they dilute the token’s price. Additionally, Backpack prioritizes regulatory compliance, currently serving only 48% of global regions to adhere to legal standards. Its goal is to build a hybrid platform integrating crypto and traditional financial services. Market reactions are mixed: Backpack is reportedly seeking funding at a $1 billion valuation, but predictions about its token FDV reflect uncertainty. Ultimately, Backpack’s model represents a shift toward transparency, long-term value, and user-centric growth in Web3.

marsbit1h ago

A New Paradigm in Tokenomics? When Backpack Makes VCs 'Delay Gratification'

marsbit1h ago

Wall Street's Top Quantitative Firm Jump Trading Enters the Prediction Market, Is the Era of Retail Investors Over?

Wall Street quantitative trading giant Jump Trading is entering the prediction market sector through strategic partnerships with leading platforms Kalshi and Polymarket. In exchange for providing liquidity, Jump will receive equity stakes in both companies—a fixed share in Kalshi and a performance-based stake in Polymarket tied to its U.S. trading volume. Prediction markets have faced persistent liquidity challenges, with platforms often experiencing shallow order books and wide bid-ask spreads outside of major events. While Kalshi previously engaged SIG as a market maker and Polymarket relied on decentralized incentives and algorithmic traders, both platforms have struggled to maintain stable, deep liquidity consistently. The equity-for-liquidity model aligns incentives: platforms gain access to Jump’s sophisticated, low-latency market-making capabilities, while Jump positions itself to benefit from the sector’s growth—Kalshi and Polymarket are valued at approximately $11B and $9B, respectively. Market making in prediction markets offers potential profits from spreads, incentives, and arbitrage, but it also carries significant risks, including event-driven volatility, limited hedging options, and regulatory uncertainty. While Jump’s advanced infrastructure and cross-asset experience may allow it to capture alpha and leverage equity upside, smaller players face high barriers to entry. The move signals a maturation of the prediction market space, with institutional participation likely to improve liquidity but also centralize influence among top-tier firms.

marsbit1h ago

Wall Street's Top Quantitative Firm Jump Trading Enters the Prediction Market, Is the Era of Retail Investors Over?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片