Nvidia Rack Disassembly Reveals New Growth Opportunity, MLCC Value Surges 182%

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-01Last updated on 2026-06-01

Abstract

Supply bottlenecks in AI infrastructure have expanded to fundamental hardware components like multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs), crucial for stabilizing power and filtering noise in AI servers. Both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley highlight MLCCs as entering a historic "volume-price dual increase" supercycle driven by AI. Goldman forecasts the AI server MLCC market to surge over fourfold from ~$1.4B in FY2025 to ~$5.8B in FY2030, a 34% CAGR. The core driver is a structural supply-demand imbalance. While AI server demand is projected to grow ~4.3x by 2030, industry capacity expands at only ~10% annually, constrained by internal production of equipment and materials. This is compounded by strong demand from electric vehicles. The shortage is evident, with lead times for high-end MLCCs exceeding 20 weeks. The price cycle has officially begun. Japanese leaders Murata and Taiyo Yuden have raised prices by 15-35% for AI server and automotive MLCCs since April, citing material costs. Japan's April export data confirms the trend, with MLCC export value up 28% year-over-year. Profit leverage is significant: Goldman estimates a mere 5% price increase could boost Murata's FY2027 operating profit by ~13% and Taiyo Yuden's by up to 37%. Morgan Stanley's teardown of Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI rack reveals another catalyst: the MLCC value per rack has skyrocketed 182% from the previous generation to ~$4,320, highlighting the component's growing importance. With demand set to ...

Editor's Note: Supply bottlenecks in AI infrastructure are spreading from GPUs, memory, data centers, and power systems to even more fundamental hardware components. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have now turned their attention to MLCCs — the multilayer ceramic capacitors long regarded as ordinary passive components.

In AI servers, MLCCs are responsible for stabilizing current and filtering noise, serving as critical components to ensure high-speed chip operation. As Nvidia's new-generation rack architecture increases MLCC usage per rack, their value is rising rapidly. Goldman Sachs expects the AI server MLCC market to grow more than fourfold between 2025 and 2030, while industry capacity is increasing at an annual rate of just over 10%. This supply-demand mismatch is becoming the core variable driving the current market cycle.

More importantly, the price cycle has already begun. Japanese leaders Murata and Taiyo Yuden have initiated price hikes, and Japanese export data are also beginning to validate demand strength. For capital markets, the MLCC logic is not complex: demand comes from AI servers and high-end automobiles, supply expansion is constrained, and price increases can significantly amplify profit elasticity.

From chips to capacitors, pricing power within the AI supply chain is shifting to more segmented and hidden links. Whether MLCCs will become the "next memory chip" still depends on whether AI server demand continues to materialize. However, it is certain that this once-overlooked fundamental component has now reached the starting point of a new cycle of simultaneous volume and price growth.

Original Article:

Supply bottlenecks in the artificial intelligence (AI) arms race are sequentially igniting opportunities across various hardware sectors. After data centers, energy infrastructure, and memory chips became focal points for capital, Wall Street giants Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley simultaneously pointed in their latest reports to a long-underestimated fundamental component: multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs). Both institutions expect MLCCs to become the next key battleground for "volume and price growth," and this AI-driven growth cycle could be the largest in history.

Goldman Sachs analyst Daiki Takayama noted in the report that the AI server MLCC market is expected to surge from approximately ¥215 billion (about $1.4 billion) in FY2025 to about ¥920 billion (about $5.8 billion) in FY2030, an increase of over fourfold, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34%. Goldman Sachs stated bluntly that the current AI-driven MLCC cycle "will be the largest and longest-lasting in history, and we believe it is still in its early stages."

MLCC: The 'Invisible Heart' Keeping AI Servers Running

An MLCC (Multi-layer Ceramic Capacitor) can be understood as an extremely miniaturized, ultra-fast-response charge/discharge unit. Unlike ordinary batteries that store large amounts of energy and release it slowly, MLCCs store very little energy but can complete charging and discharging within milliseconds or even shorter timeframes. Their core function is to smooth power fluctuations and filter noise: absorbing instantaneous voltage spikes or rapidly replenishing current during voltage dips, thereby providing stable current to sensitive chips and blocking electrical interference that could disrupt digital signals.

The operating characteristics of AI servers make MLCCs indispensable. When an AI model performs massive calculations, the processor's power consumption can spike dramatically within microseconds and then drop rapidly to near zero after the computation ends. The power supply system itself struggles to respond promptly to such drastic fluctuations. MLCCs are typically placed directly near AI chips, releasing energy instantaneously when power peaks occur to prevent server crashes. As Nvidia GPUs and other AI chips need to handle billions of tasks simultaneously, a top-tier AI server rack may require up to 600,000 MLCCs working in concert to maintain system stability.

Goldman Sachs analyst Nelson Armbrust further pointed out that MLCCs have become the third-most expensive component in the AI server bill of materials (BOM), trailing only GPUs and memory. The overall MLCC market is currently about $15 billion, with the server-related market at around $1.3 billion, expanding at a CAGR of 80%. In contrast, demand growth in other application areas like automobiles and smartphones has noticeably slowed. Daiki Takayama expects MLCCs' cost share in the AI server BOM to gradually rise from about 0.5% currently to about 1%.

Structural Supply-Demand Imbalance: Annual Capacity Growth of Just 10%, Unable to Withstand Fourfold Demand Shock

The core factor sparking market attention is the severe structural supply-demand imbalance facing the MLCC industry. Goldman Sachs analyst Allen Chang explicitly stated that the annual capacity growth rate for the entire MLCC industry is only slightly above 10%. Moreover, as equipment and materials rely heavily on in-house production, expansion progress is constrained by internal engineering resources, making it difficult to accelerate significantly. However, the demand shock from AI servers is on a completely different scale. Goldman Sachs estimates that MLCC demand driven by AI servers will grow by approximately 4.3 times between FY2025 and FY2030.

Adding to market concerns, demand for high-voltage, high-capacitance MLCCs driven by automotive electrification remains robust, with per-vehicle MLCC usage continuing to rise. These two demand pillars—AI servers and electric vehicles—are jointly consuming the limited new capacity. This situation has led consumer electronics clients, despite a downturn in demand, to actively seek long-term supply agreements to hedge against future shortage risks.

Signals of current market tightness are emerging on multiple fronts: lead times for high-end MLCCs (high-capacity, high-voltage specifications) exceed 20 weeks; prices for low-capacity and consumer-grade MLCCs in spot and distribution channels have risen 20% to 40% due to stockpiling and double-ordering; prices for key raw materials like nickel and silver remain elevated, putting pressure on costs across various products.

Price Increase Cycle Officially Begins: Japanese Leaders Initiate Hikes, Official Data Confirms Trend

Price signals are intensifying rapidly. Price hike actions by Japan's two leading companies, Murata Manufacturing and Taiyo Yuden, mark the official start of the MLCC price increase cycle. Effective April 1 this year, Murata increased prices for MLCC products used in AI servers and high-end automotive applications by 15% to 35%. Taiyo Yuden has also notified customers of price adjustments across multiple product lines starting in May, involving MLCCs, inductors, RF devices, FBAR/SAW devices, and aluminum electrolytic capacitors, citing continuously rising costs of precious metals and other raw materials.

Trade statistics released by Japan's Ministry of Finance on May 28th verify this price trend at a macro level. The data shows that the average export price of MLCCs in April rose 3% month-over-month and 16% year-over-year; export volume increased 10% year-over-year; and export value surged 28% year-over-year. Goldman Sachs believes this data confirms signals from recent financial reports of Japanese MLCC manufacturers: all companies affirmed that order momentum remains strong.

Examining the timeline of the entire AI supply chain, Goldman Sachs's analytical framework shows that MLCC price increases lag significantly behind other AI core components like DRAM, NAND memory, ABF substrates, and copper-clad laminate (CCL). Therefore, Goldman Sachs judges that among all AI components and materials, MLCCs have the longest runway and strongest sustainability for price increases. Goldman Sachs has revised its forecast for the year-over-year MLCC price change in 2026 from approximately 0% previously to 0% to +5%, emphasizing that actual future increases could far exceed this level.

Remarkable Profit Elasticity: 5% Price Hike Could Boost Operating Profit Up to 37%

For investors, the profit elasticity resulting from the MLCC supply-demand mismatch should not be underestimated. Daiki Takayama estimates that a mere 5% product price increase could theoretically boost Murata's FY2027 operating profit by about 13% and Taiyo Yuden's operating profit by up to 37%.

Goldman Sachs expects Murata's FY2027 sales to reach ¥10.5 trillion (about $66 billion), a 13% year-over-year increase, and Taiyo Yuden's sales to reach ¥286 billion (about $1.8 billion), also a 13% year-over-year increase. Goldman Sachs maintains a "Buy" rating on Murata, Taiyo Yuden, and TDK. Its constructed Asia MLCC thematic stock portfolio has recently started to strengthen but still shows significant catch-up potential compared to other popular AI themes.

Morgan Stanley Disassembles Nvidia's New Rack: Rising Importance of Peripheral Components, MLCC Usage Soars 182%

Another major catalyst comes from Nvidia's next-generation Vera Rubin AI rack. Morgan Stanley, upon disassembling Nvidia's latest VR200 rack, found that the importance of peripheral components in the latest BOM is rapidly increasing.

The MLCC value within a single rack has increased from about $1,530 in the previous-generation GB300 era to about $4,320, a surge of 182%. Although the absolute dollar amount of MLCCs remains lower than that of GPUs, memory, and PCBs, their growth rate among peripheral components is exceptionally prominent.

Morgan Stanley's channel checks further reveal that MLCC usage has increased significantly on both compute boards and switch boards, with the increase being more pronounced on compute boards. Additionally, the newly introduced BlueField and ConnectX modules will further boost the total MLCC usage per rack. This partly explains why current demand for high-end AI server MLCCs is so strong, prompting multiple ODM manufacturers to actively stockpile in preparation for the mass production and delivery of Rubin racks in the second half of 2026.

Morgan Stanley's disassembly of the Nvidia Vera Rubin rack shows the following changes in key component values:

Market intelligence indicates that in the infrastructure arms race of the AI supercycle, the sequential rotation of supply bottlenecks has already spawned wave after wave of market winners. Goldman Sachs's latest assessment describes MLCCs as the "new memory chip"—a passive component sub-industry standing at the starting point of a cycle of simultaneous volume and price growth.

As exponential demand shocks from AI servers and Nvidia Rubin racks emerge, lead times for high-end MLCCs exceed 20 weeks, Japanese industry leaders initiate price hikes, and official export data remain robust. All signals point to the same conclusion: this AI-driven MLCC supercycle has only just begun.

Related Questions

QAccording to the Goldman Sachs report, what is the projected growth of the AI server MLCC market from FY 2025 to FY 2030?

AAccording to Goldman Sachs, the AI server MLCC market is projected to grow more than fourfold, from approximately ¥215 billion in FY 2025 to about ¥920 billion in FY 2030.

QWhat is the primary function of MLCCs in AI servers, and why are they so critical?

AThe primary function of MLCCs in AI servers is to smooth power fluctuations and filter electrical noise. They provide stable power to sensitive chips by absorbing voltage spikes and rapidly supplementing current, which is critical for preventing system failures during the microsecond-level power surges characteristic of AI computation.

QWhat are the two main factors causing the structural supply-demand imbalance in the MLCC industry highlighted by Goldman Sachs?

AThe two main factors are: 1) A limited annual MLCC industry capacity growth rate of just over 10%, constrained by internal engineering resources for production equipment and materials. 2) Surging demand from two major pillars: AI servers (projected 4.3x growth from FY2025-2030) and the automotive electrification sector, which are jointly consuming the limited new capacity.

QBased on the Morgan Stanley analysis of Nvidia's new Vera Rubin VR200 rack, what was the percentage increase in MLCC value per rack compared to the previous generation?

AAccording to Morgan Stanley's teardown analysis, the MLCC value per rack in the new Nvidia Vera Rubin (VR200) rack increased by 182% compared to the previous generation (GB300 era), rising from about $1,530 to approximately $4,320.

QWhich companies were mentioned as leading the MLCC price increase cycle, and what profit elasticity does a 5% price hike potentially bring for one of them?

AThe Japanese companies Murata Manufacturing and Taiyo Yuden were mentioned as leading the MLCC price increase cycle. According to Goldman Sachs estimates, a 5% price hike could theoretically increase Murata's FY2027 operating profit by about 13% and Taiyo Yuden's operating profit by up to 37%.

Related Reads

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit40m ago

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit40m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit45m ago

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit45m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报48m ago

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片