Bitcoin’s Current Volatility Pushes Supply Held In Profit Below Historic Bull Thresholds

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-26Last updated on 2026-05-26

Abstract

Bitcoin's current price decline below $77,000 has pushed the percentage of BTC supply held in profit down to approximately 61%. This level is notably below the typical 75%+ seen during historic bull markets, signaling a shift in market dynamics and weakening investor confidence. Analyst Darkfost notes that while this is not the extreme loss dominance of a bear market, the reduction in profitable supply creates a negative environment and reflects ongoing volatility. The key resistance level remains at $80,000, which aligns with the Short-Term Holders' Cost Basis and has consistently rejected price advances since late last year, increasing pressure on short-term investors and the potential for selling activity.

After a period of downside pressure, Bitcoin’s market dynamics are starting to experience a crucial shift that could play a role in shaping its next price trajectory. With BTC’s price experiencing a decline, the supply in profit is beginning to drop, creating a highly negative environment for investors.

Percentage Of Bitcoin Supply In Profit Continues To Shrink

The Bitcoin price is now struggling within the $77,000 threshold following a recent pullback, which is now hindering its market dynamics. One of the outcomes includes the percentage of BTC supply currently held in profit falling below key levels seen during previous bull market phases.

In his analysis shared on the X platform, Darkfost, a market decoder and verified CryptoQuant author, highlighted that the Bitcoin supply being held in profit has fallen to around 61%, indicating the growing impact of ongoing market volatility. A growing number of investors are either holding unrealized losses or are getting closer to their cost basis after BTC’s downside action.

While the level may appear relatively high after first glance, the expert stated that it remains fairly low in reality. In the past, the share of supply held in profit has often stayed above 75% during bull market phases, indicating a crucial change in market dynamics. The decline in profitable supply reflects ongoing weakening confidence in the market as it moves into a phase of uncertainty.

Source: Chart from Darkfost on X

Meanwhile, bear market periods have been linked to a significantly greater domination of losses, with about 45% of the supply being retained at a loss. When BTC dropped below the $60,000 price level, the market drew close to reaching a balance between profits and losses. During this period, only 51.1% of the BTC supply was left in profit.

For investors to remain more inclined to hold their BTC, Darkfost stated that it is vital for the market to maintain a sufficiently high level of unrealized profits. Naturally, the market becomes overheated and more susceptible to short-term corrections when extremes are reached, particularly when almost all of the supply is held in profit.

Why The $80,000 Level Remains A Key Resistance

After examining Bitcoin’s price action, Darkfost has revealed that the next crucial resistance level to break is the $80,000 mark. According to the expert, this level, which represents the Short-Term Holders’ Cost Basis, has continued to act as a major resistance range since early October last year. This implies that short-term investors are still under pressure, increasing the likelihood of cautious sentiment and more selling activity in the market.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Opens New Opportunities As The MVRV Ratio Falls Below A Key Threshold

As seen on the chart, BTC was once again rejected from this crucial resistance level as it attempted to break above the $82,000 mark. However, for now, short-term holders are likely to exit the market and reduce their losses rather than continue to hold strong to their coins.

BTC trading at $77,360 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit, and how does it compare to typical bull market levels?

AThe current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit is around 61%. This is considered relatively low, as during bull market phases, this share has often stayed above 75%.

QWho provided the analysis on Bitcoin's supply in profit mentioned in the article, and on which platform was it shared?

AThe analysis was provided by Darkfost, a market decoder and verified CryptoQuant author, and it was shared on the X platform.

QWhat key price level does the article identify as the next crucial resistance for Bitcoin, and why is it significant?

AThe $80,000 mark is identified as the next crucial resistance. It is significant because it represents the Short-Term Holders' Cost Basis and has acted as a major resistance range since early October of the previous year, indicating pressure on short-term investors.

QWhat happened to the Bitcoin market when the price dropped below the $60,000 level, according to the article?

AWhen Bitcoin's price dropped below $60,000, the market neared a balance between profits and losses, with only 51.1% of the BTC supply remaining in profit.

QWhy does the expert, Darkfost, believe it's vital for the market to maintain a sufficiently high level of unrealized profits?

ADarkfost believes it is vital for the market to maintain a sufficiently high level of unrealized profits to keep investors more inclined to hold their BTC. Conversely, when almost all supply is held in profit, the market becomes overheated and more susceptible to short-term corrections.

Related Reads

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

On May 22, the U.S. SEC postponed the release of a key "innovation exemption" draft that would have permitted crypto-native platforms to issue and trade tokenized U.S. stocks on decentralized venues without full traditional exchange compliance. This would have legalized a "third-party token" model used overseas, where platforms issue tokens tracking stock prices without the underlying company's involvement, raising unresolved questions about shareholder rights, dividends, and sanctions enforcement. Meanwhile, the SEC had already approved a different, compliant path for tokenization led by Nasdaq and NYSE. Their model integrates tokenized stocks into existing settlement systems (like DTCC), preserving all shareholder rights. This creates a fundamental conflict: crypto platforms seek a permissionless, 24/7 on-chain parallel market, while traditional exchanges advocate for an upgraded, regulated version of the current system. Intense lobbying from traditional exchange groups like the World Federation of Exchanges argued the exemption would create an unfair regulatory advantage and dilute investor protection. Even some compliant crypto firms favored delay. Internally, SEC commissioners were divided on the scope and pace of the exemption. The delay highlights a critical policy crossroads. With significant trading volume already occurring overseas, the SEC's decision will determine whether the U.S. embraces a dual-track system for tokenized equities or sidelines itself from an emerging global infrastructure. The core unresolved question remains the legal status and rights of holders of third-party tokenized stocks. The SEC paused because the draft framework risked creating a major new asset class with profound, unanswered legal implications.

marsbit7m ago

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

marsbit7m ago

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

The article discusses concerns about a potential "super IPO wave" hitting the U.S. stock market, with major companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic preparing to go public. While these large IPOs could collectively raise hundreds of billions, raising fears of a market "blood drain," analysis suggests the impact may be limited. Key points include: * Historical data shows IPO waves often coincide with strong market returns, as they typically occur during periods of high investor demand. * Model estimates suggest even the largest IPOs might only cause a market dip of around 1%. They are more likely to trigger a routine market pullback rather than end a bull market. * The current demand side remains supportive due to high household cash balances, strong corporate earnings growth, continued stock fund inflows, and robust share buyback announcements. * The main risk lies in concentrated investor positions, particularly in large-cap tech stocks, which are at elevated levels. A shift in funds towards new issuances could pressure these crowded sectors. * Recent fund flows show strength concentrated in U.S. and tech stocks, while other regions like Europe and Japan are experiencing outflows. The conclusion is that the IPO wave itself is unlikely to crash the market unless it coincides with a weakening in underlying demand factors like earnings or fund inflows into U.S. equities. The focus should be on whether demand can continue to absorb the new supply.

marsbit13m ago

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit13m ago

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

Vitalik Buterin recently published an extensive article addressing core concerns about Ethereum's future direction and the role of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). He clarifies that the EF is not his personal domain nor the central authority of Ethereum; it operates as just one node within the broader ecosystem. The board makes collective decisions, with significant operational work led by Aya Miyaguchi, allowing Vitalik to focus on technical matters. The article critiques the perception that the EF should act like a conventional, fast-moving tech company. Buterin warns that merely chasing higher TPS, lower latency, or better marketing—like other chains—risks diluting Ethereum's foundational values. He draws a parallel to Google's evolution away from its "Don't be evil" ethos. Instead, the EF's renewed mandate is to focus on preserving and strengthening Ethereum's core principles, summarized as CROPS: **C**ensorship-resistance, **R**esistance to capture, **O**pen source, **P**rivacy, and **S**ecurity. The foundation will concentrate its limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of ETH) on these long-term, non-commercializable fundamentals, while ecosystem growth, applications, and market-facing activities should be driven by external teams and capital. Buterin outlines key technical priorities aligned with this vision: 1) Advancing formal verification to mathematically prove the absence of bugs; 2) Enhancing consensus security to maintain operation without reliance on social coordination during outages; and 3) Reducing dependency on intermediaries (like RPCs) to strengthen user sovereignty and privacy. He acknowledges ETH as Ethereum's most valuable asset, crucial for security, but stresses that promoting its value is a task for the wider ecosystem, not the EF. Ultimately, Buterin's message is a strategic refocus: the EF will become a smaller, more focused entity guarding Ethereum's essential, harder-to-achieve properties, ensuring it remains distinct not just in performance but in its commitment to decentralization, resistance, and security.

marsbit17m ago

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

marsbit17m ago

After Futu Securities Was Banned, Will Buying Stocks On-Chain Be a New Solution?

After Chinese regulators announced crackdowns on cross-border securities platforms like Futu Securities, some investors are exploring whether blockchain-based stock trading could offer an alternative. However, this article argues that "on-chain stocks" are not a legal loophole for mainland Chinese investors to bypass securities, foreign exchange, and cryptocurrency regulations. Instead, it represents an infrastructure experiment in tokenizing traditional assets like U.S. stocks and ETFs for a global audience. The appeal of on-chain stocks lies in offering a more seamless, 24/7 trading experience using crypto wallets and stablecoins, particularly for non-U.S. investors and crypto natives. Projects typically issue tokens that track the price of underlying assets, but these are often financial instruments or structured products, not direct equity ownership conferring voting rights. For investors, key risks include unclear legal rights, redemption mechanisms, regional access restrictions, and the misalignment between on-chain token trading hours and the actual stock market. Using stablecoins to purchase these tokens does not legitimize otherwise restricted capital outflows for Chinese residents. For entrepreneurs, the opportunity lies not in creating new retail channels to circumvent regulations, but in building B2B infrastructure—such as compliance, custody, identity verification, and reporting tools—for licensed institutions exploring asset tokenization. In conclusion, while on-chain stocks represent a significant trend in bridging traditional finance with blockchain, they are not a regulatory workaround. Their long-term viability depends on robust compliance, clear legal structures, and serving legitimate global demand, rather than facilitating unauthorized cross-border investment.

marsbit18m ago

After Futu Securities Was Banned, Will Buying Stocks On-Chain Be a New Solution?

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片