7月份Kalshi和Polymarket交易额超过500亿美元

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

2026年7月,预测市场平台Kalshi和Polymarket的总交易量达到506亿美元,较6月增长7.7%。数据显示,全球版Polymarket的交易份额下降了26%,而其美国版Polymarket US的份额则有所增长。这一变化可能与2026年5月美国版取消了等待名单制度,向美国用户开放有关,而全球版目前在美国仍被封锁。 与此同时,Kalshi的份额增长了14%,交易量达3770亿美元。增长可能得益于新产品上线以及监管环境的变化。Kalshi在体育和“奇异市场”(如捆绑事件投注)类别领先,但政治类产品需求相对较弱。 此外,7月交易活跃度提升的另一重要原因是2026年6月11日至7月19日举行的世界杯足球赛。在Kalshi和Polymarket上,决赛单场投注额分别达到19亿美元和40亿美元。

2026年7月,Kalshi和Polymarket平台的交易总额达到506亿美元,较前一个月增长7.7%。数据来源于The Block的仪表板。

值得注意的是,全球平台Polymarket的交易额份额有所下降——与6月相比减少了26%。而Polymarket US(美国版)的指标则有所增长。

这可能是因为美国平台在2026年5月取消了等待名单授权系统。这使得美国用户得以开放访问该平台。

需要指出的是,尽管公司努力撤销该决定,全球版Polymarket在美国仍处于封锁状态。Polymarket US是一个受监管的衍生品合约市场,主要提供体育赛事投注。

与此同时,Kalshi的份额增长了14%,达到377亿美元。这可能源于该平台推出了新产品,以及整体监管环境的改变。

就类别而言,Kalshi在体育和奇异市场领域处于领先地位。这包括对一系列事件的组合投注。然而,政治投注在该平台上仍然需求疲软。

7月份活动激增的另一个可能原因是于6月11日至7月19日期间举行的世界杯足球赛。Kalshi和Polymarket上决赛的投注额分别达到19亿美元和40亿美元。

end-content

Related Questions

Q2026年7月,Kalshi和Polymarket的交易总额是多少?

A2026年7月,Kalshi和Polymarket的交易总额达到了506亿美元。

Q与2026年6月相比,全球版Polymarket的7月交易量份额有何变化?

A与2026年6月相比,全球版Polymarket在7月的交易量份额减少了26%。

QKalshi在7月的交易量增长了多少?主要原因是什么?

AKalshi在7月的交易量份额增长了14%,达到377亿美元。这可能是由于其推出了新产品以及整体监管环境发生了变化。

QPolymarket US(美国版)的交易量为何可能在7月出现增长?

A这主要归因于Polymarket US在2026年5月取消了等待名单认证系统,这使得美国用户可以公开访问该平台。

Q2026年7月,Kalshi和Polymarket平台上的足球世界杯决赛单场投注额分别是多少?

A在Kalshi平台上,世界杯决赛的投注额达到19亿美元;而在Polymarket平台上,该数额达到40亿美元。

Related Reads

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit4m ago

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit4m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit9m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit9m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit9m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit9m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片