Kalshi’s $1.5B equity offering is three-quarters sold at $1.12B

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-26Last updated on 2026-08-26

Abstract

Prediction market platform Kalshi has sold $1.12 billion of a $1.5 billion equity offering, with $380 million still available, according to a recent SEC filing. The offering, which began on April 3, involves 71 investors and uses an exemption from SEC registration. This news follows Kalshi's announcement of a $1 billion Series F funding round in May, though it is unclear if this current offering is part of that round. The filing comes as Kalshi faces regulatory challenges, including a recent court order in Washington state to halt offering a range of event contracts there.

Prediction market operator Kalshi disclosed that $1.12 billion has been sold under a $1.5 billion equity offering that began in April, according to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The Form D, filed Tuesday, lists 71 investors and identifies April 3 as the date of the first sale. About $380 million remains to be sold under the offering.

The filing identifies the securities as equity and says Kalshi is relying on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D, an exemption that allows companies to sell securities without registering them with the SEC, subject to certain requirements.

Source: SEC

Kalshi announced a $1 billion Series F funding round in early May at a $22 billion valuation.

The Form D does not state whether the reported offering is the Series F. Cointelegraph contacted Kalshi for clarification but had not received a response by publication.

The filing comes as Kalshi faces legal challenges from US states over its offerings. In mid-August, a Washington state judge ordered the platform to stop offering a broad range of event contracts in the state, rejecting Kalshi’s argument that federal law overrides the state’s gambling laws.

Related: NYC council announces probe into ‘predatory marketing practices’ on prediction markets

Related Questions

QWhat is the total value of Kalshi's equity offering and how much has been sold so far?

AKalshi's equity offering has a total value of $1.5 billion. So far, $1.12 billion has been sold, leaving approximately $380 million remaining.

QHow many investors have participated in Kalshi's equity offering according to the SEC filing?

AAccording to the SEC Form D filing, 71 investors have participated in Kalshi's equity offering.

QWhat SEC regulation exemption is Kalshi relying on for this equity offering?

AKalshi is relying on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D, an exemption that allows companies to sell securities without registering them with the SEC, subject to certain requirements.

QWhat recent legal challenge does Kalshi face from a US state?

AIn mid-August, a Washington state judge ordered Kalshi to stop offering a broad range of event contracts in the state, rejecting the platform's argument that federal law overrides the state's gambling laws.

QAccording to the article, what is unclear about the relationship between the reported offering and Kalshi's Series F funding round?

AThe SEC Form D filing does not state whether the reported $1.5 billion equity offering is the same as the $1 billion Series F funding round Kalshi announced in early May. Kalshi did not respond to a request for clarification.

Related Reads

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit15m ago

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit15m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit20m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit20m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit20m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片