10万美元一个月,特朗普开始卖“Alpha”了

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-07-18Last updated on 2026-07-18

Abstract

特朗普的母公司TMTG计划将Truth Social平台上的特朗普实时发帖信息,以每月10万美元的高价出售给金融机构。购买此服务的机构能比公众提前几秒获取特朗普的政策表态等动态,用于捕捉市场交易机会。 金融市场中,信息的时间差极具价值。特朗普的言论常引发股市、汇市及加密市场的剧烈波动,因此这几秒的先机对量化基金等机构意味着潜在的巨大盈利。这本质上是在出售一种“总统Alpha”。 此前,彭博等终端也出售实时数据,但其信息是聚合而来的二手情报。而特朗普作为直接信息源,提供的是独家一手信息,形成了独特的“Trump Terminal”商业模式。 这种将总统影响力直接商业化的做法,特朗普堪称首创。其底层逻辑是持续将“特朗普”IP转化为NFT、社交平台乃至数据服务等可售卖产品。在他看来,政治影响力本身就是一种可定价、可出售的资产。

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina)

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

特朗普又双叒叕整出了超越大众认知的“骚操作”。

英国《金融时报》报道表示,特朗普媒体与科技集团(TMTG)正在探索将 Truth Social 平台上的实时信息流商业化,计划向机构客户提供低延迟数据服务,报价高达每月 10 万美元。购买这一服务的机构,将能够比普通用户更快获取特朗普最新发布的帖子,用于追踪政策信号、市场情绪以及政治事件的潜在影响。

时间差,才是市场上最值钱的东西

对于关注美国市场的投资者来说,Truth Social 并不是一个普通的社交平台。2021 年“国会山事件”后,特朗普先后遭到 Twitter(现 X)和 Facebook 等主流社交平台封禁,随后,TMTG 便推出了 Truth Social,特朗普也开始将其作为自己的主要发声渠道。尽管后来特朗普恢复了 X 账号,但其涉及关税、贸易、外交、监管等重大政策表态,仍然大多优先发布于 Truth Social,这也使得该平台逐渐成为全球投资者追踪特朗普动态的第一信息源。

可即便如此,这似乎仍是一门有些不可思议的生意。毕竟,Truth Social 本身就是一个公开平台,特朗普所发布的每一条帖子在几秒内便能够被所有人看到。既然信息是公开的,为什么还有机构愿意为此支付高昂费用?

答案其实并不难理解。金融市场里,最贵的东西从来都不是信息本身,而是比别人更早获取信息的时间差。

对于普通用户而言,早看到几秒钟几乎没有任何意义,但对于量化基金、高频交易机构乃至部分加密交易团队来说,这几秒钟足以决定一笔交易是盈利还是亏损。当市场已经习惯于根据特朗普的一举一动重新定价资产时,谁能最先获取信息,谁就拥有了率先行动的机会。

换句话说,TMTG 真正在出售的,并不是一条帖子,而是一种“总统 Alpha”。

超越 Bloomberg Terminal 的 Trump Terminal

事实上,TMTG 并不是第一个想到这门生意的人。

在华尔街,出售实时数据本就是一项极其成熟的商业模式。无论是彭博(Bloomberg)、路透(Reuters),还是纽约证券交易所、纳斯达克,都长期向机构提供付费数据服务。从上市公司的财报、宏观经济数据,到股票逐笔成交、订单簿变化,这些机构几乎都可以通过更低延迟、更高稳定性的专线或数据接口提前获取。

值得注意的是,它们出售的大多也并非“独家消息” —— 绝大多数信息最终都会向全市场公开,真正值钱的是机构能够比其他人更快几毫秒、几百毫秒,甚至几秒钟收到这些信息,这种时间优势往往意味着交易机会,甚至可以直接决定策略的盈亏。

TMTG 在做的也是同样的事情,甚至要更胜一步 —— 与 Bloomberg Terminal 等传统金融终端的不同,此类终端只是信息的采集者与分发者,而特朗普本身就是信息源。Bloomberg Terminal 再快,本质上也是对市场信息的聚合与传递;TMTG 出售的,则是特朗普在 Truth Social 上发布每一条动态的独家优先访问权。

换句话说,Bloomberg Terminal 再厉害,也不过是二手信息贩子,而大统领的“Trump Terminal”,则是绝对的一手情报。

这钱,也只有特朗普能赚

理论上,每一位美国总统,以及其他主要国家的领导人,都拥有类似的影响市场的能力。

从重要官员任免到财政政策,从外交博弈到战争冲突,领导人的一言一行都可能左右全球资本市场的定价,但真正把这种影响力包装成一门生意,并堂而皇之地向华尔街出售,特朗普大概是独一份。

这里的重要前提在于,特朗普的一手信息确实足够值钱。

过去几年,特朗普的 Truth Social 已成为全球投资者的重要信息源。从关税政策到贸易谈判,从加密货币监管到美联储主席人选,特朗普的多次发帖都曾引发美股、美元、黄金以及加密市场的剧烈波动。Trump Trade、TACO Trade 等一系列围绕特朗普政策预期形成的交易策略,更说明市场早已将他的言论视为一种可以交易的“市场因子”。

但更重要的原因,或许还是特朗普本人。如果说历任美国总统大多将自己的政治影响力视为一种公共资源,那么特朗普更习惯把影响力看作一种可以运营、可以放大、也可以商业化的资产。

回顾过去几年,从 NFT、Meme 币,到 Truth Social、Truth.Fi、Trump Mobile,再到如今向机构出售 Truth Social 实时数据服务,产品形态虽然不断变化,但底层逻辑始终没有改变 —— 不断将“特朗普”这个 IP 转化为可出售、可订阅、可投资的商业产品。

对于许多传统政客而言,总统身份意味着权力,也意味着需要与商业利益保持距离;而在特朗普眼中,两者似乎并不存在天然的界限。只要市场愿意为影响力付费,那么影响力本身就可以成为商品。

换句话说,不是特朗普创造了需求,而是他比任何人都更早意识到,“总统影响力”本身,也是一种可以定价、可以出售的资产。

Related Questions

Q特朗普媒体与科技集团(TMTG)计划通过Truth Social平台向机构客户提供何种服务,报价是多少?

ATMTG计划向机构客户提供特朗普在Truth Social平台上发布的帖子的低延迟实时数据服务,报价高达每月10万美元。购买此服务的机构能比普通用户更快获取特朗普的最新帖子。

Q为什么金融机构愿意为已经公开的信息支付高昂费用?

A金融市场中,时间差比信息本身更值钱。尽管特朗普的帖子最终会公开,但机构通过付费服务能提前几秒甚至更早获取信息,这可以为量化基金、高频交易等机构创造率先交易的机会,从而影响盈利或亏损。

Q文章将TMTG的数据服务比作什么,并称其与Bloomberg Terminal等传统金融终端有何本质区别?

A文章将TMTG的数据服务比作“Trump Terminal”。其与传统金融终端(如Bloomberg Terminal)的本质区别在于:传统终端是信息的采集与分发者(二手信息),而“Trump Terminal”提供的是信息源头(特朗普本人)的独家优先访问权,属于一手情报。

Q文章认为特朗普能够成功将自身影响力商业化的一个重要前提是什么?

A一个重要前提是特朗普的一手信息确实足够值钱。他在Truth Social上关于政策、外交、市场等方面的言论,多次引发全球各类资产市场的剧烈波动,市场已将其言论视为可交易的“市场因子”。

Q文章总结了特朗普将自身IP转化为商业产品的底层逻辑是什么?

A底层逻辑是不断将“特朗普”这个IP(个人品牌和政治影响力)转化为可出售、可订阅、可投资的商业产品。他认识到“总统影响力”本身是一种可以定价并出售的资产,并习惯性地将这种影响力进行商业运营和变现。

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitYesterday 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitYesterday 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitYesterday 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitYesterday 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitYesterday 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitYesterday 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitYesterday 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitYesterday 08:01

Trading

Spot
活动图片