After an 8% Jump, Can Stellar (XLM) Keep the Momentum Alive or Fade Quickly?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Stellar (XLM) has surged nearly 9%, trading around $0.1795 with a significant increase in daily volume. The Stellar Development Foundation highlighted a report showcasing its role in institutional settlement and real-world asset issuance. Technically, XLM is testing key resistance levels, with potential to climb toward $0.1837 if bullish momentum continues. Indicators like MACD and CMF suggest buying interest and accumulation, though the RSI indicates overbought conditions, hinting at a possible pullback. If bears take over, support at $0.1774 may be tested, with further decline possible below $0.1753.

The CEO and Executive Director of Stellar Development Foundation, Denelle Dixon, has highlighted a report from Allium Labs that verifies how Stellar is powering institutional settlement, compliance, treasury management, and real-world asset issuance.

This report breaks down the on-chain evidence behind that shift, as cross-border stablecoin settlement at scale. It also includes institutional treasury and on-chain yield strategies, protocol-native compliance, and developer and smart contract ecosystem growth.

Meanwhile, Stellar has posted an 8.97% jump, and some of the crucial resistance ranges between $0.1654 and $0.1790 have been tested to confirm the entry of the bulls. Currently, it is trading at around the $0.1795 mark, with the daily trading volume of XLM up by over 29.47% to $178.07 million.

With the active bullish traction in the Stellar market, the price might climb to the resistance at the $0.1816 range. Upon breaking this level, the upside pressure could gain more power, push the golden cross out, and send the price toward a high level, above $0.1837.

If the XLM bears enter and reclaim the lost momentum, the price might fall and test the $0.1774 support. Assuming a breakdown below this mark could trigger a potential downside correction. Eventually, the death cross emerges and takes the price below $0.1753.

Stellar Technical Indicators Point to Bullish Momentum

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line is above the signal line, and both are found above the zero line, showing a healthy uptrend. The upward move has good momentum, and the price is holding strength. The Stellar market will be moving higher unless the momentum starts to fade.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator located at 0.10 hints at a clear buying interest. Notably, the capital is flowing into the asset, with the buyers having an edge. But it is not extreme, but has a steady accumulation. The momentum of XLM builds strength, supporting a gradual move higher.

Stellar’s Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of 0.0174 is very close to neutral, with a slight bullish tilt. The buyers have a tiny edge, but there is no solid strength. The market feels indecisive, and it is moving sideways unless the momentum starts to build in either direction.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) is positioned at 77.24, which falls in the overbought zone. The XLM price has run up quite fast, and the buyers have been in strong control. At these levels, the market is due for a pullback, even if the overall trend stays strong.

Top Updated Crypto News

TRUMP Price Test: Can Support Trigger a Bounce or Extend the Downtrend?

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

Bitcoin is diverging from a record-high global M2 money supply (over $135 trillion), challenging the historical assumption that rising liquidity directly lifts BTC prices. While a bullish view suggests Bitcoin is merely lagging and will eventually catch up as capital rotates into riskier assets, a more cautious "regime-change" argument posits that factors like spot ETFs, institutional flows, and a stronger dollar may have weakened the direct correlation. For traders, this divergence presents a clear macro question to monitor: whether Bitcoin's price will confirm a delayed rally or signal a lasting change in its relationship with global liquidity. The outcome will shape how future liquidity data is interpreted.

bitcoinist8m ago

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

bitcoinist8m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit19m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit19m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit28m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit28m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit39m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit39m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit52m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy XLM

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Stellar (XLM) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Stellar (XLM) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Stellar (XLM)After purchasing your Stellar (XLM), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Stellar (XLM)Easily trade Stellar (XLM) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XLM (XLM) are presented below.