【重磅解读】 BTC发出杠杆空头入市信号,ETH非常接近压力位

火必研究院Published on 2022-08-10Last updated on 2022-08-11

Abstract

BTC多空比大幅度回撤,变盘压力进一步提升。

1、 BTC回撤提示调整信号

反弹阶段价格涨幅收窄以后,BTC的布林线指标明显处在收口状态。这个时候,BTC短线反弹至布林线上轨后遇阻回撤,8月9日价格收盘下跌进一步提示反转信号。BTC在图中位置出现穿头破脚形态,价格已经接近跌破布林线中轨对应的22939美元,表明BTC正在选择向下回撤。据此判断,近期持币风险已经提升。特别是在交易量萎缩期间,BTC的反弹节奏没戏减缓,价格回调压力开始出现。

2、多空分歧加大

BTC的合约多空分歧已经加大,8月9日的多空实力开始向空方倾向,多空比下降到了0.894,数值为2021年12月3日以后最低值。也就是说,BTC开始提示向下回撤的交易信号。当然,多空比的下降并非短期完成,从7月22日开始,多空比就开始逐步回落,数值从1.09附近逐步回落到8月9日的低点。在多空比回落期间,BTC价格开始停滞不前,进一步验证了向下风险。

3、 BTC链上转账非常活跃

相对活跃的链上转账数据显示,BTC目前处在一个投资者关注度较高的阶段。特别是相对交易所现货交易量维持稳定的情况下,链上转账同步表现较好,意味着BTC的潜在交易热度还不算低迷。尽管如此,考虑到活跃地址数的表现并不理想,每日活跃地址数维持在90万附近,这明显要低于2021年中旬以前的平均水平。因此,近期可适当关注价格回调的抛压变化,注意低吸机会。

4、ETH多空争夺到关键阶段

ETH价格震荡相对频繁,点位上继续靠近斐波那契61.8%对应的1910美元。同时ETH的日内交易量持续萎缩,RSI指标继续提示背离回落信号,变盘势在必行。消息面,ETH合并日期临近,利好兑现后关注价格波动后的突破方向变化。趋势上,ETH反弹空间提升以后,对1000美元支撑的确认不断加强。近期需要考虑的调整因素比较多,价格在2000美元下方的抛售需要关注。

5、稳定币发送地址活跃度反弹

近期ETH的发送地址数短线反弹,波动趋势与ETH表现一致。同期,稳定币的接收地址数表现稳中有降,意味着稳定币在供应量大体不变的情况下,其持币的集中度在提升。多数稳定币持有者大量发送稳定币,意味着稳定币的持币集中度短线反弹。

这表明,持币的主力,或者说是持币的巨鲸数量增长,对行情的影响加深。

Related Reads

STRC Must Re-Anchor for a BTC Bull Market to Happen

Title: STRC's Depegging Threatens MicroStrategy's Bitcoin-Buying Machine, and Thus the BTC Bull Run Summary: The sustained depegging of MicroStrategy's priority share STRC (trading ~25% below its $100 target) is severely disrupting the company's core business model and poses a major risk to Bitcoin (BTC) price support. STRC was MicroStrategy's most efficient and low-cost funding tool, designed to allow continuous capital raises near its $100 par value to fuel relentless BTC accumulation. Its depegging has effectively blocked this primary funding channel. The situation creates a severe cash flow crisis. STRC and other priority shares now obligate MicroStrategy to pay approximately $1.7 billion in annual cash dividends, while the company's cash reserves are only about $1.4 billion — insufficient to cover one year of payments. To raise cash, MicroStrategy is increasingly resorting to issuing common stock (MSTR) through ATM offerings. However, recent raises show most proceeds (around 90% in one week) are now used to bolster cash reserves rather than buy Bitcoin. This dilutes the key metric of Bitcoin per MSTR share, eroding the fundamental value proposition for equity investors. The company faces grim alternatives: issuing high-cost debt or selling its massive Bitcoin holdings. The latter, though hinted at, would likely trigger significant negative market reactions. Conclusion: As BTC's largest corporate holder and a major marginal buyer, MicroStrategy's funding woes mean reduced, and potentially reversing, institutional buy-side pressure. The company has shifted from being a guaranteed source of BTC demand to a significant overhang on the market. The article argues that without STRC re-anchoring to restore its funding engine, a sustained BTC bull market is in jeopardy.

marsbit13m ago

STRC Must Re-Anchor for a BTC Bull Market to Happen

marsbit13m ago

No Bull Market for BTC Without STRC Re-pegging

Summary: The sustained de-pegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) Strategy Preferred Shares (STRC) poses a severe threat to Bitcoin (BTC) and could prevent a bull market. STRC, designed to trade near a $100 target, has plunged to around $75, effectively shutting down MicroStrategy's cheapest and most efficient funding channel. This channel was critical for its "raise funds, buy BTC" business model. More critically, MicroStrategy now faces a massive cash outflow from these preferred shares. With approximately $10.49 billion of STRC outstanding at an 11.5% dividend yield, the annual cash obligation exceeds $1.2 billion. Combined with other preferred shares, the total annual payout nears $1.7 billion, depleting its current ~$1.4 billion cash reserve within a year. To address this, MicroStrategy is increasingly relying on common stock (MSTR) offerings via its ATM program. However, recent sales show most raised capital is now used to bolster cash reserves rather than buy more Bitcoin. This dilutes the key metric of BTC per share for common stockholders, eroding the foundation of its premium valuation. If STRC cannot re-peg, this costly dilution may continue. Worse, if cash pressure intensifies, selling Bitcoin becomes a real risk. As the largest corporate BTC holder (~847,363 BTC), any significant sales could crash the market. Thus, MicroStrategy is transforming from BTC's most reliable institutional buyer into a major potential seller, casting a significant shadow over Bitcoin's price prospects.

Odaily星球日报14m ago

No Bull Market for BTC Without STRC Re-pegging

Odaily星球日报14m ago

Tornado Cash Suffers Another Governance Attack: A Fake Proposal Targets $23 Million Community Treasury

On June 25, 2026, a deceptive governance proposal (#67) appeared in the Tornado Cash DAO, masquerading as an upgrade to implement fee adjustments and token burns. Security researchers, including Sergey Shemyakov and Pascal Caversaccio, quickly identified it as malicious. The proposal's unverified code contained a hidden function designed to stealthily replace the protocol's legitimate governance address (0x5efda50f22d34F262c29268506C5Fa42cB56A1Ce) with an attacker-controlled address (0x5efda50f22d34f272c7077689d6abc42f15e285f). If passed, this would have granted the attacker control over the DAO's treasury, containing approximately $23 million in TORN tokens, and the ability to drain all relayers. The attacker's wallet (0xd4eca8c9242b9f9faa3cf19a78defc21dc97a925) was funded via the privacy protocol Railgun four days prior, obscuring the source. The community response was swift, with the proposal receiving 27,163 TORN votes against (100%) and 0 for, far below the 100,000 TORN quorum required for validity. It is set to expire on June 30. This incident marks the second major governance attack on Tornado Cash, following a May 2023 exploit that stole $2.17 million. It highlights persistent vulnerabilities in DAO structures where power derives from token ownership. The article advises users to follow security researchers, vote against unverified proposals, and delegate voting power. For developers, implementing timelocks—a delay between proposal approval and execution—is presented as a critical security measure to allow for community review and intervention.

Foresight News34m ago

Tornado Cash Suffers Another Governance Attack: A Fake Proposal Targets $23 Million Community Treasury

Foresight News34m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片