Crypto Regulation Heats Up: Senate Sets December Vote On Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-11-28Last updated on 2025-11-28

Abstract

The US Senate is preparing for a possible vote on the crypto market structure bill, which would outline clear rules...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The US Senate is preparing for a possible vote on the crypto market structure bill, which would outline clear rules for how the country should deal with digital assets.

Lawmakers say the measure could finally settle the long-running dispute over whether tokens should be treated as commodities or securities, a decision that would determine which regulator takes charge.

Senate Targets December Markup

As proposed by the committee, the markup for the crypto market structure bill will be on December 8, 2025; this allows senators to debate and change parts of the text before moving it forward.

According to reports, the Senate Banking Committee and the Senate Agriculture Committee plan to move forward with their own drafts and then unify them into one text for the second phase. If both committees clear their drafts, the unified text would be forwarded for a vote by the full Senate.

Early Vote Still Not Certain

But there are some issues that may hamper the speed of the bill. There are reports that several sections on decentralized finance remain bracketed, indicating that senators have not settled on final language.

Senator Tim Scott, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, aims to achieve progress before the year is out. Other members warn that unresolved disagreements could delay a final vote until early 2026. How quickly the committees finish their reports and iron out remaining disputes will determine the schedule.

Two Committees, One Question

Banking and Agriculture have differed over the extent of regulators’ powers. Members on the banking side want greater protections for ordinary investors, including custody and trading protections.

Agriculture members are preoccupied with market structure rules and commodity oversight. Both committees must agree on one system or talks could hit another dead end. The industry groups say they want clarity. Regulators have stayed cautious while waiting to see where Congress lands.

What’s At Stake For Markets

According to sources tracking the talks, a passed bill could give exchanges and crypto firms a set of clearer rules on how to register, list assets, and manage user funds. That might encourage more companies to operate in the US.

BTCUSD currently trading at $90,857. Chart: TradingView

People trading crypto could also see better protections. Critics worry that strict rules might push startups abroad. The choices lawmakers make will influence how money flows into the sector.

Key Issues Around DeFi Oversight

According to sources, the most contentious disagreements over changes involve DeFi. Senators continue to disagree over how such protocols should be regulated and who is liable when something goes wrong.

While some lawmakers prefer narrow rules that won’t hurt small developers, others are pushing for broader authority over platforms that increasingly resemble traditional financial services. That debate has left large swaths of the text incomplete.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Related Reads

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Prime Intellect, a decentralized AI infrastructure company founded in 2024, recently announced a $130 million Series A funding round at a $1 billion valuation, with investments from NVIDIA, Intel, and Dell's venture arms. The company claims its annualized recurring revenue (ARR) has exceeded $100 million within a year, serving over 6,000 enterprise clients. Initially rooted in Web3 and decentralized science (DeSci), Prime Intellect has evolved into a full-stack AI training and deployment platform. Its core technology enables distributed training of large language models across globally dispersed, heterogeneous GPU clusters. Key milestones include releasing open-source models like INTELLECT-1 and INTELLECT-3, and launching Prime Intellect Lab, a platform allowing users to train and optimize agentic models without managing their own GPU infrastructure. The company's deep collaboration with hardware giants, particularly NVIDIA, extends beyond investment to joint optimization of software (e.g., integrating NVIDIA Dynamo) and hardware systems. A notable commercial case involves fintech company Ramp using Prime Lab to train a specialized agent, demonstrating the platform's applied value. While achieving rapid commercial growth, Prime Intellect has systematically downplayed its earlier Web3 and token-based incentives from its official documentation, repositioning itself as a mainstream AI infrastructure provider focused on enterprise adoption and potential IPO.

Foresight News9m ago

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Foresight News9m ago

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

Strive Asset Management's BTC-linked preferred stock SATA transitioned from monthly to daily dividend distributions on June 16, with a current annualized yield of 13%. Despite this change, SATA's price fell approximately 9.9% from June 22 to June 26. The analysis highlights that this decline reflects fundamental credit and structural risks, not simply dividend frequency. SATA represents a perpetual, cumulative preferred equity interest in Strive, not a direct Bitcoin-backed bond. Its dividends depend on Strive's corporate credit and access to capital markets. While Strive's Bitcoin holdings grew from 15,009 to 19,864 BTC between May 12 and June 18, SATA's outstanding shares grew faster (from ~4.96 million to ~7.83 million). Coupled with a drop in BTC price, the pure Bitcoin coverage ratio for SATA's stated amount fell from ~2.44x to ~1.52x. A further ~34.3% decline in BTC to ~$39,416 would bring this coverage to 1.0x. Daily dividends smooth cash flow for investors and reduce dividend-capture trading, but do not eliminate price volatility or credit risk. SATA now trades at a ~12.25% discount to its $100 stated amount, implying a market yield of ~14.81% and a credit spread of ~1,117 bps over SOFR. Key risks include a negative feedback loop if SATA trades below par, making new issuance dilutive; reliance on capital markets for dividend funding despite a ~17-month cash buffer; and the perpetual nature of the security, where dividends can be deferred. In summary, SATA innovates by providing daily income from a Bitcoin-focused corporate balance sheet, but its recent price action underscores its exposure to Bitcoin valuation, company-specific financing risks, and perpetual duration. The market is repricing it from a near-par yield product to a deeply discounted high-risk credit instrument.

marsbit38m ago

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

marsbit38m ago

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

"Pump.fun Faces Crucial Test with $125M Token Unlock Despite a cooldown in the meme coin market, Pump.fun remains one of Web3's top revenue-generating protocols, earning $28.4 million in the past 30 days. The platform has accumulated approximately $1.05 billion in total revenue from over 12 million tokens created. The protocol now faces its biggest challenge: the first unlock of team and investor tokens. A total of 82.5 billion PUMP tokens (8.25% of total supply, 20.23% of previous circulating supply), valued at around $125 million, have been unlocked. This potential selling pressure is significant compared to the token's 24-hour trading volume of only $28 million. While Pump.fun uses a portion of its revenue to buy back and burn PUMP tokens, creating buy-side pressure, this support has weakened. The buyback rate was reduced from 100% to 50% of net fees in April 2024. In June 2024, monthly buybacks totaled just $9.2 million, an over 80% drop from its peak. At this rate, selling just 7% of the newly unlocked tokens would offset a full month of buybacks. Furthermore, this unlock is only the first batch; team and investors still hold another 247.5 billion locked PUMP tokens, with 240 billion community tokens awaiting a release schedule. Despite these headwinds, PUMP is argued to be a relatively scarce asset in the current market. With a $610 million market cap against $28.4 million in monthly revenue, its valuation is lower than competitors like Hyperliquid. The investment thesis for PUMP is not betting on a single meme coin but on the persistent activity of the meme market and Pump.fun's ability to maintain its position as a key platform. The conclusion suggests that while the unlock tests short-term price resilience, the protocol's underlying revenue strength will determine PUMP's long-term trajectory, potentially making the current dip a viable entry point for long-term accumulation."

Odaily星球日报50m ago

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

Odaily星球日报50m ago

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

MegaETH, once a highly anticipated new blockchain, has seen a dramatic decline in its Total Value Locked (TVL) and token price. According to DefiLlama data, its TVL plummeted nearly 60% in 24 hours, falling to just over $30 million from a May peak, with the Aave V3 protocol withdrawing 80% of its liquidity. The MEGA token price dropped to around $0.048, with a market cap of ~$54 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of ~$480 million. The analysis identifies three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals. First, its high FDV contrasts with minimal real usage: low protocol revenue (~$90k/30 days) and few daily active addresses. Second, its DeFi narrative is contradicted by its revenue structure, where a collectible card game (Monster) generates most income, not major DeFi protocols like Aave. Third, initial hype from VC backing and airdrop farming has faded without sustained user adoption or clear applications. The TVL was heavily concentrated in Aave and largely driven by cyclical arbitrage strategies involving stablecoins like USDm and USDe. As the yield for these strategies diminished, funds rapidly exited. The departure of this speculative capital has exposed a lack of substantial, organic ecosystem activity. While the sharp drop could be seen as a correction from inflated expectations, the article suggests MegaETH's valuation lacks a solid foundation. Future price movements may rely on short-term market sentiment rather than genuine improvement in network fundamentals, such as increased real usage, a diversified application ecosystem, and consistent user growth. The situation reflects a broader market trend of demanding clearer value propositions beyond just high TVL figures.

marsbit1h ago

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片