Breaking: KeyFi Files Lawsuit Against Celsius, Millions Of Dollars At Risk?

BitcoinistPublished on 2022-07-08Last updated on 2022-07-08

Abstract

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it...

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it is linked to lending company Celsius. Jason Stone founder and CEO of investment firm KeyFi wrote a thread explaining its relationship with the lending company and why it has decided to file a lawsuit against it.
Filed on July 7th in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, KeyFi accused Celsius of not honoring its contractual obligations to pay for “the millions of dollars it is owed” to the Stone-led company. This entity entered into a handshake agreement with Celsius to manage its clients’ funds.
The lending and borrowing crypto company attracts clients by offering high interest on their deposits, as the document explained, this forced them to seek yield with an external party, KeyFi. The latter took the funds and invested them in decentralized finance protocols, staking, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other strategies.
The company managed the funds via the Oxb1 Ethereum address which held millions of dollars in Celsius’ client funds. In late 2020, the document claims, KeyFi and Celsius decided to formalize their agreement and create a new company called Celsius KeyFi. Stone explained:
After discussions with Celsius in mid 2020, Celsius began an acquisition of KeyFi’s assets and team. Thereafter, I pivoted KeyFi to staking and deploying DeFi strategies for Celsius. In August 2020, 0xb1 was created, along with other addresses, to send Celsius’ customer deposits to us to manage.
Clients were unaware of these activities and were unaware that the company included, as part of their terms of service, a clause in which they allegedly agreed to transfer ownership of the funds from their addresses to Celsius. At one point, KeyFi managed over $2 billion in assets.

Bitcoin Celsius BTC BTCUSD

BTC’s price trends to the downside on the 4-hour chart. Source: BTCUSD Tradingview Celsius A Ponzi Scheme?
In late 2021, Stone and his team discovered that “Celsius had lied to us”. KeyFi was tasked with setting positions and applying investment strategies under the agreement that Celsius was hedging their actions.
However, Stone discovered that the company had “naked exposure to the market”. In other words, Celsius was not mitigating the risk from KeyFi positions or protecting itself against impermanent loss.
In addition, the document clients that the company was using its clients’ funds to prompt up the value of its native token CEL and manipulate the market. The document filed with the NY court says:
The parties’ relationship began to break down when Stone discovered that not only did Defendants lack basic security controls to protect the billions of dollars in customers’ funds they held, but that they were actively using customer funds to manipulate crypto-asset markets to their benefit. The most egregious example of this was Plaintiff’s discovery that Celsius used customer bitcoin deposits to inflate its own crypto-asset called the “Celsius token” (“CEL”).
In March 2021, Stone and his team decided to terminate the relationship but were met with opposition from Celsius. Stone claims he has been trying to reach an agreement with the company but failed.
Celsius has been attracting a lot of attention after it halted all users’ withdrawals, and allegedly entered a state of insolvency. Thus, Stone and KeyFi are looking for compensation via court.
The exact amount of money to be paid to KeyFi, if they win the case, will be determined by the court.
Given the public speculation about the company’s solvency, and my observation of Celsius’ loose relationship with the truth, I feel it is only prudent to finally set the record straight. I have brought legal action against Celsius to settle this issue once and for all.
— 0xb1 (@0x_b1) July 7, 2022
The document accused the CEO and Celsius’ founder Alex Mashinsky of “enriching himself” and allegedly transferring funds from the Oxb1 address to “his wife” and the company of running a “Ponzi Scheme”. At the time of writing, there is no official statement from Mashinsky or Celsius about these accusations.

Related Reads

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit32m ago

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit32m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片