DATs down 90% as Bitcoin fell 10% – Is the institutional party over?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-11-11Last updated on 2025-11-12

Key Takeaways

Why are Digital Asset Treasuries struggling now?

Weekly inflows have dropped 95% since July highs.

How does DAT performance compare to Bitcoin?

BTC is down just 10%, while most DATs have plunged between 40% and 90%.

Institutional interest in Digital Asset Tokens (DATs) seems to be running out of steam.

After months of steady inflows, the tide has turned – with weekly allocations plunging by more than 95% over the past four months. The once poster-boy of investments now looks like it’s in a cooling phase, so is the trend coming to a natural end?

Not the cool kids on the block anymore?

Data from DeFiLlama showed weekly inflows have fallen from a peak of $5.57 billion in July 2025 to just $259 million by November.

This is a staggering 95% drop.

DAT inflows

Source: DeFiLlama

The decline came as broader market sentiment weakened and crypto prices struggled to recover from the recent tariff-driven crash. Confidence among corporate buyers who once viewed crypto as a hedge and growth asset is decreasing.

The once-hyped institutional treasury strategy may be entering a pause or reset phase.

Buying high, losing faster

Source: X

The performance gap between Bitcoin [BTC] and Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) has widened sharply over the past three months. While BTC was down just about 10%, most DAT-linked assets have plunged between 40% and 90%.

Several DATs (including those tied to Metaplanet and Naka) are deep in negative territory, even as BTC’s market value holds relatively firm.

As losses mount and premiums vanish, DAT managers are under growing pressure to choose between pausing new purchases or continuing under difficult conditions.

Analyst Adam noted that most major DATs are now trading below their average crypto purchase prices, with their shares falling even further.

Source: X

Issuing new stock at a discount erodes value, trapping these funds with assets bought near the top. If forced to liquidate, their large BTC, Ethereum [ETH], and Solana [SOL] holdings could intensify selling pressure across the market, testing the resilience of the entire DAT model.

Next:
Share

Related Reads

Crypto Gains State-Level Support As South Carolina Bans Federal CBDCs

South Carolina has joined over a dozen U.S. states in enacting legislation to protect cryptocurrency rights. Governor Henry McMaster signed Senate Bill 163, which passed with near-unanimous support. The law prohibits state agencies from accepting or requiring payments in a Federal Reserve-issued central bank digital currency (CBDC) or participating in related pilot programs, though privately issued stablecoins like USDC remain permitted. Beyond the CBDC ban, the legislation establishes a broad framework for digital assets. It protects the right of individuals and businesses to accept cryptocurrencies as payment, formally recognizes self-hosted wallets, and prevents discriminatory taxation on digital asset transactions. The law also provides legal protections for crypto mining operations against unfair local regulations and exempts certain activities like node operation and staking services from money transmitter licensing. It includes consumer protection measures, allowing the state Attorney General to prosecute fraud in staking or mining services.

bitcoinist46m ago

Crypto Gains State-Level Support As South Carolina Bans Federal CBDCs

bitcoinist46m ago

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

The article discusses how Solana's vision of becoming the "Internet Capital Markets" is being challenged, primarily by the rise of Hyperliquid. While Solana positioned itself as a high-performance blockchain for tokenizing all global assets, its native token SOL has significantly underperformed, and its core narrative faces pressure. Hyperliquid, initially a perpetual contracts platform, has evolved into a specialized Layer 1 financial network. Its focused, trading-optimized design is attracting users and capital, suggesting a vertical L1 may be better suited for a core capital market than a general-purpose chain like Solana. This external competition was compounded by an internal $200M+ exploit on Solana's key derivatives protocol, Drift, creating a strategic vacuum. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the Phoenix protocol as a decentralized, composable alternative. However, Phoenix's trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters also launched critiques against Hyperliquid's decentralization, citing its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics countered that Solana's own decentralization metrics have weakened, and the foundation's overt backing of Phoenix caused friction with other ecosystem builders. The piece concludes that Solana risks losing the "Internet Capital Markets" race if it cannot regain dominance in derivatives, potentially remaining a meme coin hub rather than achieving its grand ambition of hosting all global assets.

marsbit1h ago

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

marsbit1h ago

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

President Trump has signed an executive order, "Incorporating Financial Technology Innovation into the Regulatory Framework," pressuring the Federal Reserve to reassess its rules on granting non-bank financial companies—including crypto and fintech firms—access to its payment systems, specifically master accounts that connect to the Fedwire settlement system. Currently, such accounts are primarily reserved for depository institutions. The order mandates a review to determine if broader access is permissible and to establish an application process. This move, supported by figures like Senator Cynthia Lummis, aims to reduce barriers to innovation and lower public payment costs by fostering fairer competition. It does not grant immediate access but could pave the way for companies like Kraken, Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, lowering costs and speeding up settlements. A key precedent is the Kansas City Fed granting Kraken's parent company a restricted master account in March, offering limited payment services without interest or credit privileges. This model is seen as a potential template for allowing controlled access while mitigating systemic risk. Other firms like Anchorage, Paxos, and BitGo, which hold specialized banking charters, are also well-positioned to apply. The banking industry, represented by the American Bankers Association, opposes easing access, arguing any institution handling bank-like payments must meet the same stringent regulatory, consumer protection, and risk-management standards as traditional banks. Their core concerns include potential systemic risks, compliance gaps in areas like anti-money laundering, and the diversion of liquidity from the traditional banking system. The outcome of the Fed's review will be crucial in determining whether and how crypto and fintech firms can integrate more directly into the core U.S. financial infrastructure, balancing innovation with financial stability.

marsbit1h ago

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

marsbit1h ago

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

The article describes a potential large-scale strike at Samsung Electronics, narrowly averted in May 2026 after a temporary agreement. The strike, planned by the company's union, would have been the first major labor action in the AI era targeting a core AI supply chain player. Samsung, alongside SK Hynix, produces roughly two-thirds of the world's memory chips, critical components for AI training and data centers like HBM. An 18-day strike could have disrupted global supply, affecting prices and production for tech companies and cloud providers. For South Korea, where semiconductors constitute about 35% of exports and Samsung represents a quarter of the stock market's value, such an action threatens national economic stability. The union's demands include a 7% base wage increase and, crucially, a clear, substantial profit-sharing model. They want 15% of annual operating profit as an employee bonus pool and the removal of the existing cap (about 50% of annual salary). This frustration is amplified by seeing rival SK Hynix successfully negotiate a deal granting employees 10% of operating profit as bonuses, with reports suggesting some workers could receive bonuses equivalent to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The conflict stems from deeper issues in South Korea's chaebol (conglomerate) system, where rapid national industrialization often prioritized corporate growth over labor rights. Samsung long maintained a "no union" policy until a 2020 apology from its leader. The article argues this strike highlights a fundamental tension in the AI age: as technology advances and corporate profits soar—often driven by AI—the workers who build the infrastructure are demanding a fair share and dignity, rejecting the notion that they are mere expendable components in a machine that "must not stop." The piece concludes that the true test of the AI era isn't just computational power, but whether the people who build the future can secure a stable and valued place within it.

marsbit2h ago

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

marsbit2h ago

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing financial regulators and the Federal Reserve to review expanding fintech and crypto firms' access to core payment infrastructure. This order significantly advances the industry's push for direct Fed connectivity, a central issue for Ripple. The company has been seeking a Federal Reserve master account as part of its strategy for its RLUSD stablecoin, which would allow it to hold reserves directly with the central bank and access its payment rails. The order, titled "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks," mandates a Fed review within 120 days on allowing access for entities like uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies, including those in digital assets. This creates a formal policy timeline for resolving whether crypto payment firms must rely on traditional bank intermediaries. Ripple's application for a national bank charter and a master account is part of this broader landscape. The issue gained precedent when Kraken Financial received a limited-purpose master account, while Custodia Bank's application was denied after a legal battle. The Fed has also proposed a more restricted "payment account" option. Trump's order does not guarantee approval for Ripple but forces a high-level examination of the regulatory barriers, bringing the company's long-running effort to the forefront of Washington's financial policy agenda.

bitcoinist2h ago

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

bitcoinist2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions