96亿美元抛压零波动!比特币剑指14万美元?

比推Published on 2025-07-30Last updated on 2025-07-30

作者:UkuriaOC、CryptoVizArt、Glassnode

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

原标题:近百亿抛压市场纹丝不动,比特币直指 14 万?


上周末比特币的流动性经历了一次重大考验,一名早期投资者通过 Galaxy Digital 场外交易服务抛售了超过 8 万枚 BTC。尽管如此,市场仍展现出强劲韧性,绝大多数投资者仍选择持有,而非获利实现账面收益。

执行摘要

上周末比特币的流动性面临严峻挑战,一名早期大额投资者通过 Galaxy Digital 场外交易服务抛售了超过 8 万枚 BTC。尽管这笔高达 96 亿美元的卖盘对市场上涨造成压力,但市场仍快速承接了巨量抛压,价格短暂下跌至 11.5 万美元后迅速企稳于 11.9 万美元,略低于历史高点。

即便经历如此大规模的抛售事件,市场参与者持有的未实现利润规模依然可观。目前未实现利润总额高达 1.4 万亿美元,流通供应量中仍有 97% 处于盈利状态。

根据多个链上估值模型显示,比特币价格目前处于 10.5 万至 12.5 万美元的区间震荡。若实现有效突破,价格可能进一步上探 14.1 万美元,鉴于该价位预计将出现大量未实现利润兑现,此处可能面临显著卖压。

深度流动性

实现市值(Realized Cap)是链上分析的基础指标,用于量化比特币网络中以美元计价的流动性总量。目前该指标已突破 1.02 万亿美元,凸显出该资产日益增长的流动性深度与市场厚度。

上周末,这项流动性承受了实际检验。一名比特币早期投资者通过 Galaxy Digital 的服务抛售 8 万枚 BTC(约合 96 亿美元),可能通过市场抛售与场外交易混合方式进行。由此产生的卖压将价格推低至 11.5 万美元,随后稳定在 11.9 万美元。

这一事件彰显了比特币即使在流动性通常较薄的周末交易时段,仍能消化巨额卖盘的能力,印证了市场结构的稳健性。

此次事件同时推动已实现净盈亏指标(Net Realized Profit/Loss)飙升至 37 亿美元的历史峰值。值得注意的是,该指标的飙升先于周末抛售,反映了资金在最终分配前的提前移动。

由于该批代币最初被实体调整算法标记为内部转账,后续通过 Galaxy Digital 进行的地址变动被记录为具有经济意义的交易,即所有权变更。

近期获利了结行为的激增推动已实现盈亏比率(Realized Profit/Loss Ratio)急剧加速,当前实现利润已达亏损的 571 倍。该数值处于极端高位,历史上仅有 1.5% 的交易日高于此水平。

但解读该信号需要审慎。虽然极端获利了结行为可能伴随价格顶部(如 2024 年 3 月 7.3 万美元历史高点时的情形),但这并非即时反应。例如在 2024 年末突破 10 万美元时,获利了结峰值出现在 9.8 万美元价位,但市场后续仍上涨 10% 至 10.7 万美元才见顶。

这种滞后性表明,显著升高的获利了结量往往预示(但非立即导致)市场衰竭。它形成需要时间消化的供给压力,市场反应可能存在时滞。

持有时长分析

在消化大量长期休眠代币后,长期持有者净实现盈亏(Long-Term Holder Net Realized Profit/Loss)创下 25 亿美元的历史新高,超越此前 16 亿美元的峰值。这标志着比特币历史上最大规模的单次卖压事件,一次极端的流动性压力测试,但市场表现出惊人韧性,价格始终维持在历史高点附近震荡。

这进一步印证了比特币市场在经历重大分配事件时非凡的承压能力,此前本周期内已见证过门头沟赔偿与德国政府抛售等考验。

通过对比长期与短期持有者的供应量比率,可见本轮周期三次历史高点形成过程中均出现相同模式:初始积累阶段后,总会伴随向激进分配的急剧转变。

当前分配阶段仍在持续,LTH/STH 供应比率持续收缩。过去 30 天该比率下降 11%,仅 8.6% 的交易日跌幅更为剧烈,凸显投资者行为转变的强度。

未实现利润分析

尽管上周末面临包括长期投资者大规模获利了结在内的显著卖压,比特币市场仍保持异常稳定。因此,绝大多数参与者仍持有可观未实现利润,97% 的流通供应量当前持仓成本低于现货价格。

市场参与者持有的账面收益总额(即未实现利润)近期创下 1.4 万亿美元的历史峰值。这表明多数投资者坐拥巨额浮盈,若价格继续上涨,可能引发未来潜在的卖压。

我们还可将未实现利润市值占比作为标准化指标进行观察。当前该指标再次突破 +2σ区间,历史上该水平常与市场狂热期及历史顶部形成阶段重合。这从标准化视角再次印证参与者持有显著未实现利润的现实。

这表明许多投资者对市场状况持乐观态度,这既是情绪的助推剂,也意味着后续获利了结动机可能增强。

与往期周期不同的是当前长期持有者仍掌握 53% 的财富。尽管该群体在本周期持续分配,但在未实现利润已处于高位的环境下,这一比例仍保持可观。

整体动态显示长期持有者可能仍有进一步抛售。随着价格升至足以激活深层休眠巨鲸代币的诱人水平时,市场需要更多需求流入来吸收抛压。

市场成本分析

通过比特币成本基础分布图可见,11.7 万 -12.2 万美元区间存在显著的成本基础聚集。这表明大量投资者在该高价区间完成积累。

值得注意的是,现货价格下方 11-11.5 万美元区间存在交易量真空带,这是价格快速拉升过程中未经历充分换手的结果。并非所有真空带都需要回补,但该区域存在价格引力,市场可能需测试该支撑的有效性,这使其成为回调时需重点关注的区域。

短期持有者成本基础(代表新进投资者的平均持仓成本)历来是划分局部牛熊市况的关键阈值。通过叠加标准差区间可增加统计维度:

  • STH CB +2σ: 14.16 万美元

  • STH CB +1σ: 12.51 万美元

  • STH 成本基础: 10.54 万美元

  • STH CB -1σ: 9.21 万美元

关键观察在于比特币价格始终高于短期持有者成本基础,这是市场走强的积极信号。此外本周期所有主要顶部结构中,价格均在 +1σ区间遇阻,当前格局亦不例外。

宏观视角显示在决定性突破前,比特币可能维持 10.5 万 -12.5 万美元区间震荡。若有效突破,14.1 万美元区域(对应 +2σ区间)可能成为下一个强阻力位,此处链上指标预示卖压可能急剧增强。

通过分析短期持有者内部子群组的成本基础,可构建"快慢成本基础带"作为短期市场情绪的动量指标。当前价格仍高于所有短期子群组成本基础,显示市场强度。值得注意的是,24 小时至 3 个月持仓者的成本基础带(11-11.7 万美元)与成本基础分布图中的低量区高度重合。

多项独立指标的共振强化了该价格区域的重要性,暗示其可能成为回调时的关键支撑。

为深入观测子群组动量,我们采用等权复合指标衡量盈利子群组数量占比。该指标长期高于均值并趋近 +1σ水平,表明当前市场动量稳健,多数新投资者仍处于盈利状态。

总结与结论

上周末比特币的韧性经历严峻考验,市场高效消化了 8 万枚 BTC(价值 96 亿美元)的抛售,这是其历史上规模最大的获利了结事件之一。尽管交易规模惊人,价格仍迅速企稳于历史高点附近,彰显当前市场流动性的深度与成熟度。

目前比特币维持 10.5 万 -12.5 万美元区间震荡。有效突破该区间可能改变市场格局,使 14.1 万美元成为下一个焦点,链上指标显示该区域可能出现剧烈获利了结。反之,当前价格下方 11-11.5 万美元的低量区值得密切关注,若出现回调,该区域将成为关键观察位。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News5m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News5m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News23m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News23m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit34m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit34m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片