Dogecoin Nears 8 Million Holders—Where Do XRP, Bitcoin Stand?

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-06-10Last updated on 2025-06-10

Abstract

On-chain data shows the Dogecoin user base has grown to nearly 8 million recently. Here's how other major assets like...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

On-chain data shows the Dogecoin user base has grown to nearly 8 million recently. Here’s how other major assets like XRP and Bitcoin compare.

Dogecoin Beats Several Top Coins In Total Amount Of Holders

In a post on X, the on-chain analytics firm Santiment has shared how the various top coins in the cryptocurrency sector have compared against each other in terms of the Total Amount of Holders.

The Total Amount of Holders here refers to an indicator that measures, as its name suggests, the total number of addresses that are carrying some non-zero balance on a given network.

When the value of this metric rises, it can have a number of underlying causes. New investors coming into the network and old ones who had sold earlier returning, both result in an increase for the indicator. Existing users creating fresh wallets to distribute their holdings or for privacy purposes can also naturally contribute to this trend.

In general, all of these factors could be assumed to simultaneously be at play whenever the Total Amount of Holders goes up. As such, some net adoption takes place alongside this trend.

For any cryptocurrency, adoption is something that tends to be constructive, as a wider user base can provide for a more solid foundation for the asset to grow on in the future. Usually, though, the positive effects of it only end up being visible in the long term.

Now, here is the chart shared by the analytics firm that shows the trend in the Total Amount of Holders for eight top digital assets: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), XRP (XRP), Dogecoin (DOGE), Cardano (ADA), Chainlink (LINK), Tether (USDT), and USD Coin (USDC).

Dogecoin Vs Bitcoin Vs XRP

Looks like the value of the metric has shot up for Dogecoin in recent weeks | Source: Santiment on X

As displayed in the above graph, the Total Amount of Holders has steadily been going up for all of these assets recently, which suggests adoption has been occurring across the top coins.

One asset, however, stands out for its particularly sharp growth: Dogecoin. From the chart, it’s visible that the memecoin saw the indicator go through a steep climb last month, indicating that users opened up a large amount of DOGE wallets inside a narrow window. That said, while this was a very sharp jump, the indicator has more or less plateaued for the asset since then.

The Dogecoin network now has 7.97 million holders. This makes the cryptocurrency the third largest on this list, ahead of USDC’s 7.79 million and XRP’s 6.53 million.

The memecoin is still only the “king of the rest,” though, as both Bitcoin and Ethereum are many times larger. ETH, especially, boasts an impressive 148.38 million non-empty addresses, outweighing BTC by a factor of nearly 3.

DOGE Price

At the time of writing, Dogecoin is trading around $0.185, down almost 3% in the past week.

Dogecoin Price Chart

The trend in the DOGE price over the past five days | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, Santiment.net, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

Related Reads

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

This article examines the rise of prediction markets, contrasting their growing institutional acceptance in the West with their restrictive regulation in Asia. It details how prediction markets, which originated from informal political betting and academic experiments like the Iowa Electronic Market, aggregate crowd wisdom into probabilistic prices through binary contracts. Their growth accelerated around 2020, reaching over $14 billion in monthly volume. A key driver is the "skin in the game" principle, where users risk their own capital, leading to high accuracy in predicting events like Fed rate decisions and elections, as demonstrated by platforms like Polymarket. Meta's entry, with Mark Zuckerberg reportedly leading the development of the Arena app, signals the market's maturation. In the U.S., court rulings have distinguished prediction markets from gambling, facilitating entry by traditional financial institutions. However, most Asian jurisdictions still classify them as gambling, focusing on social control rather than financial innovation. The article argues this stance creates three problems for Asia: 1) regulatory arbitrage pushes users to riskier offshore platforms, 2) loss of sovereign information infrastructure as valuable social sentiment data accumulates abroad, and 3) abandonment of user protection. It concludes that Asia needs a policy shift from prohibition to constructive regulation, integrating these markets into the formal system to harness their data as a national asset, as initiatives like Limitless Research are beginning to do.

marsbit43m ago

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

marsbit43m ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手2h ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手2h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit3h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit3h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News3h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片