通过推特关注时间线,我们可以发掘哪些有价值的信息?

链捕手Published on 2025-05-30Last updated on 2025-05-30

作者:RootData

 

推特是加密行业信息密度最高的平台,几乎所有项目都是在推特上进行最早期的品牌拓展与用户增长,因而也是行业早期 alpha 最多的场景。如今每天都有成千上万的项目充斥着推特信息流,早期 alpha 信息实质上很难被高效发掘与过滤,除了对项目介绍与产品的细致研究,知名人物的推特关注已经成为很多用户判断某个新项目前景的重要信号之一。

不过在推特页面上,用户只能看到某个项目被自己关注的哪些账号关注,并没有具体的时间线,而且自己关注的账号往往具有局限性。

在最近的更新中,RootData 已经推出了推特关注时间线功能,也就是可以展示每个推特账号每天被哪些账号关注或者被取关。这不仅覆盖了数据库收录的超过3万个项目/机构与人物,还覆盖了所有未收录的推特账号,这意味这任何人都可以搜索并查看自己或他人推特被哪些知名加密推特账号关注与取关。

此外,对于超过 5000 个已收录的知名推特账号,还可以关注他们每天关注和取关了哪些账号。所有推特账号的被关注与被取关数据,都是来自这 5000 多个知名推特账号。

通过这个功能,我们将可以通过追踪知名账户的关注流,发现很多有意思的信息,比如某个暴涨项目的最早期关注者都有谁,cz、马斯克最近关注或取关了哪些加密项目、哪些项目与人物最近被取关得最多,等等。

以近期的热门项目 BUILDon 为例,通过推特关注时间线,我们可以看到土澳大狮兄与嗯哼都在 5 月 16 日就已经关注该项目推特,而直到 5 月 22 日,其代币 B 才开始明显上涨并被更多 KOL 关注。

我们再看看刚刚获得700 万美元融资的代理浏览器项目 Donut,在它的推特关注时间线上,LaughingChung-Hsun Chang ChienJerry ZhouMike Tomaino嗯哼是相对较早的一批知名关注者。

通过更多项目的数据分析,我们可以统计出哪些 KOL 关注早期 alpha 项目的时间更早,不过由于部分关注数据统计周期不够长,更加量化的统计将在1-2个月后发布。

同时,我们也可以查看知名人物的对外关注与取关动态,比如何一近期关注了Rita、川沐、雕刻等人物,取关了冰蛙,赵长鹏近期取关了子时、Travala.com 等账号。

为了避免用户需要点击不同页面来查看关注动态的麻烦,我们也推出了 X 关注数据聚合页,用户可以在这里直接查看一百多个头部推特账号每天的关注与取关动态。下方截图便是 5 月 29 日的汇总数据。

另一个有意思的数据是,最近几个月哪些项目与人物被关注最多?哪些被取关最多?

被取关最多的 15 个项目分别是 AIXBT、zerebro、Optimism、zkSync、Polygon、Kaito、Arbitrum、Blast、Movement、Scroll、Galxe、Abstract、monchain、Lens Protocol、Avalanche。

被取关最多的 15 个人物分别是 Ryan Selkis、Elon Musk、Jesse Pollak、Rushi Manche、Shaw、Rune Christensen、Mert Mumtaz、Ansem、Su Zhu、Ajit Tripathi、David Hoffman、嗯哼、Anthony Pompliano、Kain Warwick、Neel Somani。

被关注最多的 15 个项目分别是 Etherealize、Believe、Plasma、Kaito、Axiom、MegaETH、DoubleZero、Defi App、Ethereum R1、Lighter、Ethos Network、Noise、Converge、Wayfinder、time.fun。

被关注最多的 15 个人物分别是 Tomasz Stanczak(Lantern Capital 联合创始人)、Ben Pasternak(Believe 联合创始人)、Ella Zhang(YZi Labs 负责人)、Yu Hu(Kaito 创始人)、Vivek Raman(Etherealize 创始人)、Cobie(echo 创始人)、 Zach Witkoff(World Liberty Financial联合创始人)、Alon(Pump创始人)、Danny Ryan(Etherealize联合创始人)、Paolo Ardoino(Tether 首席执行官)、David Sacks(美国政府人工智能和加密主管)、Federico Carrone(Aligned Layer 联合创始人)、Lily Liu(Solana 基金会主席)、Rob Hadick(Dragonfly 普通合伙人)、Jeff Yan(Hyperliquid 联合创始人)。

 

Related Reads

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbit3h ago

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbit3h ago

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbit3h ago

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbit3h ago

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

Chinese CPO stocks plunged over 6% following Corning's announcement of its Glass Bridge platform at a Seoul tech conference. The new technology utilizes wafer-level glass ion-exchange waveguides for passive alignment between fibers and photonic chips, potentially simplifying traditional CPO architectures that rely on complex Fiber Array Units and active alignment equipment. This raised market concerns about reduced long-term demand for mid-stream CPO components. Corning's official documentation details Glass Bridge as a platform for fiber-to-PIC connectivity in NPO, CPO, and high-density modules. Its key features include wafer-level manufacturing for consistent, cost-effective production; a standardized, removable MT ferrule interface for ecosystem integration; and a separable high-density connector design supporting over 24 channels for assembly flexibility. Corning positions the technology as complementary to FAUs, addressing limitations in ultra-high-fiber-count scenarios. The market reaction reflects a broader reassessment of the AI optical interconnect value chain. Funds shifted from CPO and PCB manufacturing stocks towards glass substrate concept stocks like Kaisheng Technology and Dyer Laser. Analysts note glass substrates are seen as a next-gen advanced packaging material, offering a potential path for domestic industry differentiation amid AI-driven demand for high-performance, large-scale packaging, marking a structural migration in value towards upstream specialty materials.

marsbit3h ago

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片