Bitcoin Price Bid For $87,000 Sends Short Traders Running As Liquidation Losses Cross $110 Million

BitcoinistPublished on 2025-03-24Last updated on 2025-03-25

Abstract

The Bitcoin price surge toward $87,000 has ignited a wave of short liquidations, forcing bearish traders to close their positions...

The Bitcoin price surge toward $87,000 has ignited a wave of short liquidations, forcing bearish traders to close their positions at a loss. In the last 24 hours, the total market liquidation passed $200,000, with the majority of this loss coming from short positions.


Bitcoin Price Surge Trigger Massive Short Liquidations


According to liquidation heatmaps from Coinglass, Bitcoin alone has accounted for $77.33 million in liquidations, with $67.04 million coming from short positions. This indicates that a large number of short traders expected BTC to decline but were forced to exit as prices moved against them and hit the $87,000 mark. 

Coinglass shows that in the past 24 hours, the total crypto market liquidations, which surpassed $200 million, saw a $143 million loss from short positions. Exchange data also reveals that Bybit, a renowned crypto exchange, led with $32.65 million in BTC short liquidations, followed by Binance with $16.45 million, Gate.io and other exchanges.


Notably, this large-scale liquidation event signals a classic short squeeze, where long positions are more favoured as short traders are pushed to buy at a loss, leading to a stronger surge in the BTC price. If Bitcoin continues its momentum and surpasses the $87,000 price point, further liquidations could accelerate its upward movement and push it to new highs.

Bitcoin

Source: Chart from Coinglass Currently, Bitcoin’s price is trading at $87,415, closely regaining its previous bullish momentum. The cryptocurrency has skyrocketed by 3.65% in the past 24 hours, aligning with the increase in liquidation amongst short traders. 

Just this past month, Bitcoin was trading under $85,000, with this decline driven by broader market volatility and widespread liquidations. Despite the price crash, the cryptocurrency’s trading volume has remained relatively high, increasing by 124%, according to CoinMarketCap.  


With BTC finally reclaiming the $87,000 mark, analysts are optimistic about its future outlook. Crypto VIP signal, an analyst on X (formerly Twitter), has revealed that the next local resistance for Bitcoin is between $87,000 and $87,400. If the pioneer cryptocurrency can surpass this range, the analyst predicts a surge toward $89,000 – $90,000 and then another rally between $92,000 – $93,000. 

Whales Go On Buying Spree As BTC Surpasses $87,000


While Bitcoin surges past $87,000, whales are accumulating large amounts of BTC despite growing concerns of a potential decline. Notably, an X parody of Michael Saylor, the founder of MicroStrategy, has highlighted a recent increase in Bitcoin whale activity.

According to the reports, whales are buying Bitcoin during price dips, possibly in anticipation of future price increases. A chart from CryptoQuant was shared, tracking Bitcoin’s liquidity inventory and demand from accumulator addresses. 


The circled regions in the chart show periods when whale demand spiked significantly, aligning with price surges. The recent increase in whale activity suggests a renewed interest in BTC as its price attempts to recover from previous price declines and market volatility.

Bitcoin

BTC trading at $87,743 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com

Related Reads

Interview with Former Goldman Sachs CEO: Crisis, Leadership, AI, and Advice for Young People

Former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein discusses crisis leadership, risk management, and AI in an interview with a16z's David Haber. Reflecting on guiding Goldman through the financial crisis, he emphasizes building organizational resilience, making decisions under pressure, and preserving culture during growth. He shares his calm reaction during a White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting, illustrating his crisis mindset. Blankfein explains that effective leadership involves both encouraging calculated risk-taking and implementing safeguards. He highlights the value of "mark-to-market" practices and independent valuation as early warning systems. On technology, he notes finance eagerly adopts tech for competitive edges but must manage risks carefully, especially with AI's opaque, automated trading. He advises AI companies to proactively engage with the public before crises arise. For young professionals, he recommends becoming well-rounded individuals by studying history and humanities, as opportunities often lie at the intersection of disciplines. Your reputation and relationships, built over decades, are crucial long-term assets.

marsbit48m ago

Interview with Former Goldman Sachs CEO: Crisis, Leadership, AI, and Advice for Young People

marsbit48m ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit54m ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit54m ago

PhotonPay Upgrades Embedded Wallet API: Building an "Invisible Yet Indispensable" Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Foundation

PhotonPay announces a major upgrade to its Embedded Wallet API, enabling traditional businesses to integrate stablecoin payments rapidly without managing private keys or complex compliance burdens. This "hands-off" infrastructure aims to make blockchain settlement invisible to both enterprises and end-users, offering a structural alternative to costly and slow traditional cross-border payments, which average 6.36% in fees. Key features include rapid developer integration, built-in regulatory compliance (AML/CFT, KYC), high-security key management, and seamless interoperability between fiat and stablecoins. The company argues that in an era of increasing regulatory clarity (e.g., MiCA) and mature institutional infrastructure (Visa, Stripe), "compliance-first" design is a competitive moat. PhotonPay's solution targets platform businesses like B2B marketplaces and SaaS providers, helping them tap into the growing $28 trillion (adjusted) stablecoin transaction volume driven by global demand for efficient settlements.

链捕手1h ago

PhotonPay Upgrades Embedded Wallet API: Building an "Invisible Yet Indispensable" Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Foundation

链捕手1h ago

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手1h ago

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手1h ago

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit1h ago

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions