3 reasons why Solana (SOL) price is 50% down from its all-time high

CointelegraphPublished on 2025-02-24Last updated on 2025-02-26

Abstract

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Solana (SOL) price has declined by 50% since hitting an all-time high of $295 on Jan. 19. February’s 42% drawdown is also the largest monthly drawdown since November 2022, when FTX exchange collapsed.

Markets, Market Analysis, Solana, Ethereum Price, Arbitrum, Memecoin

Solana’s 4-hout chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingViewWhile the uncertainty tied to Solana’s 11.2 million token unlock and the LIBRA memecoin scandal are likely playing a role in the current decline, there are fundamental reasons that provide a better explanation for the recent correction.
Solana’s TVL dropped by $5 billion since Jan. 25
Solana surpassed its record high $10 billion high total value locked (TVL) in January and has been in a decline since reaching that top. After reaching a $12 billion TVL, it has since dropped to $7.13 billion.

Markets, Market Analysis, Solana, Ethereum Price, Arbitrum, Memecoin

Solana TVL and onchain volumes. Source: DefiLlamaData from DefiLlama highlighted that the subsequent decrease in TVL was led by Raydium, with a whopping 60% drop in less than a month. Other major decentralized applications such as Jupiter DEX, Jito liquid staking, and Kamino Lending registered a 25%, 46% and 33% decline respectively.
These directly impacted Solana’s onchain volumes, which dropped from a weekly collection of $97 billion in the second week of January to only $7 billion this week.
These metrics indicate a glaring shift in trust for Solana’s ecosystem, leading to massive decline in activity over the past month.
$500 million shifts to Ethereum, Arbitrum and other blockchains
SOL price and the network’s collapse in activity has caused a seismic shift in interest from traders, and most are moving their liquidity to other chains. Over the last 30-days, traders have bridged close to $500 million to other chains, with Ethereum, Sonic and Arbitrum being notable destinations.

Markets, Market Analysis, Solana, Ethereum Price, Arbitrum, Memecoin

Solana outflows data to other chains. Source: debridge.financeCrypto analyst Miles Deutscher highlighted that Solana’s fee burn dropped to its lowest value of $177,000 in a month, and said,
“People are tired of getting burned at the casino, and many are walking away from the tables.”

Collapse of the memecoin meta
At the height of its influence, Solana's collective memecoin market cap stood at $25 billion in December 2024. The current value has declined to $8.3 billion, with a 23% crash over the past 24 hours.

Markets, Market Analysis, Solana, Ethereum Price, Arbitrum, Memecoin

Solana memecoins on CoinGecko. Source: X.comAfter 7.5 million tokens were launched and $550 million revenue was generated on Pump.fun, most of these memecoins from this market are down 80% to 90%. While SOL is not a memecoin, the rise and fall of these tokens affected its perceived valuation.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手3h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手3h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手3h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手3h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit3h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片