Vitalik Buterin 思考以太坊合并后的未来

tokeninsight_newsPublished on 2024-10-14Last updated on 2024-10-14

据 Cointelegraph 报道,以太坊联合创始人维塔利克·布特林(Vitalik Buterin)分享了他对协议未来的愿景,强调在合并后的世界中对权益证明(proof-of-stake)、安全性等方面的改进。

布特林在社交媒体上发表了关于协议状态及其在合并后潜在演变的反思。在 10 月 14 日的一篇详细博客文章中,布特林强调了以太坊可以在几个关键领域实现显著进步,包括更快的交易速度、增强的安全性以及对个人质押者的更大可及性。

合并后的思考

2022 年的以太坊合并标志着协议从工作量证明(proof-of-work)转向权益证明(PoS)。布特林称这一事件为“艰苦得来”和“期待已久”,但指出在 PoS 方面仍有重要领域需要改进。

布特林认为,以太坊未来的主要目标之一是减少交易完成所需的时间。目前,完成一笔交易大约需要 15 分钟,这在以太坊是最繁忙的区块链网络的情况下,可能会令人沮丧。这种延迟可能导致网络拥堵。

布特林建议探索诸如单槽最终性(single-slot finality)等解决方案,这可以大幅减少交易时间。这将使以太坊更具竞争力,并改善整体用户体验。他在 7 月时曾提出过单槽最终性。

布特林还讨论了如何使以太坊对更广泛的用户群体更加可及。目前的质押要求为 32 个以太币,这对许多希望参与网络的人来说可能是一个障碍。布特林提议将最低质押金额降低至 1 ETH,使更多人能够为以太坊的安全性和治理作出贡献。

保障网络安全

布特林强调了通过实施名为单秘密领导者选举(single secret leader election)的加密技术来保护以太坊免受攻击的重要性,这将使攻击者更难以干扰网络。

此外,布特林建议探索提高协议对量子计算威胁的抵抗力的方法,因为这可能在未来构成重大挑战,并增加 51% 攻击的法定阈值和恢复能力。

布特林的帖子发布之际,以太坊正期待其开发路线图上的下一个里程碑——计划于 2025 年第一季度上线的布拉格-电力(Prague-Electra,简称 Pectra)升级。

Related Reads

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

Airwallex's founder, Jack Zhang, outlines the three primary paths in the global payments industry and explains why the company chooses the most demanding one: building its own global financial infrastructure. The article begins by highlighting a common industry problem: payment platforms appear homogenized on the surface, offering similar features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts. However, their underlying capabilities differ vastly. Customers truly care about payment stability, compliance robustness, and reliable market entry support. Zhang identifies three strategic paths: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Systems (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency via stablecoins and blockchain settlement but struggles with mainstream adoption, significant regulatory friction, and a lack of competitive edge against established players, often leaving it with niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a modern interface over legacy banking and partner networks. While enabling fast expansion, it fails to solve core issues like dependency on correspondent banks and intermediary risk, merely postponing the need for solid foundations. 3. **Building Own Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex, Ant International, and others. It involves obtaining local licenses, establishing direct regulatory relationships, building local teams, and controlling the full technology stack. This "heavy" approach is slow and capital-intensive but aims to internalize complexity, providing customers with a "lighter" experience. The core argument is that for business clients, the highest cost isn't transaction fees but hidden risks like frozen accounts, payment delays, and regulatory shocks. By investing heavily in its own infrastructure, Airwallex seeks to absorb these complexities, offering customers greater stability, cost savings (beyond fees), and long-term certainty. This foundational investment, though initially slow, enables compound growth, as evidenced by Airwallex's accelerated revenue scaling. In conclusion, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—owning the underlying infrastructure—creates durable value for customers and sustainable advantage for the payment provider.

marsbit2h ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

marsbit2h ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and capital-intensive route but aims to internalize complexity. Airwallex's strategy of "heavy" investment in its own infrastructure is framed not as inefficiency, but as a long-term bet to provide clients with greater stability, cost savings beyond fees, and certainty. The platform's "heaviness" absorbs risk and operational complexity, aiming to deliver a "lighter" experience for business customers. The article concludes that in global payments, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—the underlying infrastructure—is what creates durable value for clients and sustainable competitive advantage.

链捕手2h ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片