Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-09-26Last updated on 2024-09-26

Abstract

马斯克为特斯拉机器人产品预热发布的推文,让以太坊 meme 市场展开了一场「机器人乱斗」。

今晨,网红河马 MOODENG 市值突破一亿美元大关,在 Solana 的 meme 市场中再度掀起一阵「动物园」热潮,与此同时,马斯克为特斯拉机器人产品预热发布的推文,则让以太坊 meme 市场展开了一场「机器人乱斗」。

Solana 动物城

企鹅 PESTO

$PESTO 是一只来自澳大利亚的萌物巨型帝企鹅 Pesto,Pesto 在 Web2 的火热程度直追河马 Moodeng,MOODENG 引起 meme 社区注意后,PESTO 也成为了「龙二」标的,Solana 上的$PESTO 上线于 9 月 18 日,表现强势。上线后涨幅超 8 倍。之后的一天遭遇大幅回调,日跌幅超 80% ,市值跌破一百万美元。昨日晚间,PESTO 开始拉盘,至今日上午涨幅超 300% 。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

最高市值: 21.27 M

当前市值: 18 M

24 h 交易量: 17 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 170% ;当前盈利: 117% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

小象 TOTO

TOTO 是一只被慈善动物保护信托基金 SheldrickTrust 所救助的小象,马斯克曾在 8 月 11 日回复过 TOTO 被救助的推文,TOTO 代币上线于 19 日,市值在突破 1 M 美元后持续下跌,昨日晚,TOTO 的救助组织 Sheldrick Wildlife Trust 发布了 TOTO 回顾视频,meme 社区的 TOTO 喊单也密集出现,三个小时后,TOTO 开启暴涨。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

最高市值: 4.6 M

当前市值: 2.56 M

24 h 交易量: 3.6 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 600 ;当前盈利: 374% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

猴子 GEORGIE

乔吉·男孩 (Georgie Boy) 是 Tiktok 上的一只网红小猴,在 Tiktok 上拥有 1600 万粉丝,于 2021 年 6 月 Georgie 去世。代币上线于今日凌晨,目前共有 1088 个持有者。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

最高市值: 679 K

当前市值: 158 K

24 h 交易量: 3.0 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 678% ;当前盈利: 158% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

河狸 BOBR

波兰网民多年来一直保持着一项长期的网络传统,即在网上发布看到海狸的画面,通常会配上大声的惊叹「Kurwa Bóbr」,翻译过来就是脏话,也是波兰语中「海狸」的意思。但这个曾经只是 YouTube 上的小众奇闻,如今成为了网上广为人知的梗。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

最高市值: 618 K

当前市值: 359 K

24 h 交易量: 1.5 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 864% ;当前盈利: 556% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

青蛙 omochi

Omochi 也是 Tiktok 上一只广受欢迎的小青蛙,它在 Tiktok 上有 42 万个关注者,数条短视频浏览量超过千万次。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

最高市值: 494 K

当前市值: 448 K

24 h 交易量: 1.3 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 622% ;当前盈利: 619% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

以太坊机器人

今日上午 10 时,马斯克在 X 平台发布预告称将于 10 月 10 日发布人形机器人产品,并称「这将载入史册」,海报中配文「We Robot」,随后以太坊上便出现了 ROBOT 和 WR 两个较为火热的 meme。其中,ROBOT 短时拉升近 6 倍,WR 短时亦拉升近 20 倍。还有社区成员根据对产品名称的猜测,将此前的大小写$Robotaxi、$cybercrab、$FSD 等均列入了观察列表。

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

ROBOT

最高市值: 1.07 M

当前市值: 623 K

24 h 交易量: 1.7 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 13500% ;当前盈利: 9130% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

WR

最高市值: 613 K

当前市值: 248 K

24 h 交易量: 1 M

今日 12 AM(GMT+ 8)买入最高盈利: 4021% ;当前盈利: 1742% 

Meme市场动向:Solana掀起「动物园」热潮,以太坊开启「机器人乱斗」

Related Reads

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit5m ago

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit5m ago

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge fund VIP and mutual fund overweight lists: BA, MA, MRVL, and V. This "shared favorites" basket has returned 10% YTD, outperforming the equal-weight S&P 500. Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are on the hedge fund VIP list but are uniformly underweighted by mutual funds.

marsbit15m ago

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbit15m ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit1h ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片