Solana 变“疯狂动物城”,以太坊 Robot 异军突起

链捕手Published on 2024-09-26Last updated on 2024-09-26

作者:Joyce、Jack,BlockBeats 

 

今晨,网红河马 MOODENG 市值突破一亿美元大关,在 Solana 的 meme 市场中再度掀起一阵「动物园」热潮,与此同时,马斯克为特斯拉机器人产品预热发布的推文,则让以太坊 meme 市场展开了一场「机器人乱斗」。

Solana 动物城

企鹅 PESTO

$PESTO 是一只来自澳大利亚的萌物巨型帝企鹅 Pesto,Pesto 在 Web2 的火热程度直追河马 Moodeng,MOODENG 引起 meme 社区注意后,PESTO 也成为了「龙二」标的,Solana 上的$PESTO 上线于 9 月 18 日,表现强势。上线后涨幅超 8 倍。之后的一天遭遇大幅回调,日跌幅超 80%,市值跌破一百万美元。昨日晚间,PESTO 开始拉盘,至今日上午涨幅超 300%。

最高市值:21.27M

当前市值:18M

24h 交易量:17M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:170%;当前盈利:117%

小象 TOTO

TOTO 是一只被慈善动物保护信托基金 SheldrickTrust 所救助的小象,马斯克曾在 8 月 11 日回复过 TOTO 被救助的推文,TOTO 代币上线于 19 日,市值在突破 1M 美元后持续下跌,昨日晚,TOTO 的救助组织 Sheldrick Wildlife Trust 发布了 TOTO 回顾视频,meme 社区的 TOTO 喊单也密集出现,三个小时后,TOTO 开启暴涨。

最高市值: 4.6M

当前市值:2.56M

24h 交易量:3.6M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:600;当前盈利:374%

猴子 GEORGIE

乔吉·男孩 (Georgie Boy) 是 Tiktok 上的一只网红小猴,在 Tiktok 上拥有 1600 万粉丝,于 2021 年 6 月 Georgie 去世。代币上线于今日凌晨,目前共有 1088 个持有者。

最高市值: 679K

当前市值:158K

24h 交易量:3.0M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:678%;当前盈利:158%

河狸 BOBR

波兰网民多年来一直保持着一项长期的网络传统,即在网上发布看到海狸的画面,通常会配上大声的惊叹「Kurwa Bóbr」,翻译过来就是脏话,也是波兰语中「海狸」的意思。但这个曾经只是 YouTube 上的小众奇闻,如今成为了网上广为人知的梗。

最高市值: 618K

当前市值:359K

24h 交易量:1.5M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:864%;当前盈利:556%

青蛙 omochi

Omochi 也是 Tiktok 上一只广受欢迎的小青蛙,它在 Tiktok 上有 42 万个关注者,数条短视频浏览量超过千万次。

最高市值:494M

当前市值:448K

24h 交易量:1.3M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:622%;当前盈利:619%

以太坊机器人

今日上午 10 时,马斯克在 X 平台发布预告称将于 10 月 10 日发布人形机器人产品,并称「这将载入史册」,海报中配文「We Robot」,随后以太坊上便出现了 ROBOT 和 WR 两个较为火热的 meme。其中,ROBOT 短时拉升近 6 倍,WR 短时亦拉升近 20 倍。还有社区成员根据对产品名称的猜测,将此前的大小写$Robotaxi、$cybercrab、$FSD 等均列入了观察列表。

ROBOT

最高市值: 1.07M

当前市值:623K

24h 交易量:1.7M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:13500%;当前盈利:9130%

WR

最高市值: 613K

当前市值:248K

24h 交易量:1M

今日 12AM(GMT+8)买入最高盈利:4021%;当前盈利:1742%

Related Reads

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit10m ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit10m ago

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手44m ago

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手44m ago

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit1h ago

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片