Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录（9月25日）

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-09-25Last updated on 2024-09-25

Abstract

Sui Meme抬头；埋伏CZ出狱概念Meme和EDU；领空投前必备安全插件。

本新栏目为 Odaily 编辑部成员真实投资经历分享，不接受任何商务广告，不构成投资建议（因为本司同事都很擅长亏钱），旨在为读者扩充视角、丰富信源，欢迎加入 Odaily 社群（微信@Odaily 2018 ，Telegram 交流群，X 官方账号）交流吐槽。

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录（9月25日）

推荐人：Asher（X：@Asher_ 0210 ）

简介：短线合约、低市值山寨长线埋伏、链游打金、撸毛党

分享：

  1. BTC、ETH：之前等的 61500 的多单没等到，那就继续等，要么 67000 开始空，要么 61500 开始多，中间区间不做（ETH 与 BTC 同步操作），精力放在找热门山寨上。

  2. 山寨：一是 ALT，周一也推荐过，从 0.1 买涨到了最高接近 0.14 ，快 40% 涨幅了，手里现货继续等 0.2 开始卖，这波回调幅度大的话考虑再加个合约多；二是 MAX，项目本身看好，但这个币太弱了，不适合合约玩家， 0.3 的现货不管了；三是 CATI， 0.78 开了多，目前浮亏， 0.73-0.75 支撑，不跌破看一波到 0.88 。

推荐人：南枳（X：@Assassin_Malvo）

简介：链上玩家，数据分析师，除了 NFT 什么都玩

分享：

  1. 转战 Sui Meme，暂时持有 PLOP、MOVEPUMP、LIQ（附《Sui 掀起 Meme 潮，一文速通交易工具与热门代币》）；

  2. 埋伏了 CZ 出狱概念 EDU，以及链上 Meme，链上市值太小，自行查看 CZ 最后几条推文找。

推荐人：Azuma（X：@azuma_eth）

简介：南枳的小迷弟；低频操作、高频反指。

分享：

  1. 小规模加仓一些山寨。ENA，原因是降息周期开始后国债类稳定币收益下跌，市场复苏后资金费率慢慢修复（套利收益复苏），此消彼长利好 USDe 供应增长；TIA，比较经典的短线解锁行情， 10 月大规模解锁，机构需要拉高才有空间套保，该撤就撤。

  2. EigenLayer 及其生态 LRT 协议相继开放了 EIGEN 第二季空投的申领，由于每个 LRT 协议的查询窗口不一样，“广撒网”选手查起来还是挺麻烦的，推荐个不用连钱包的聚合查询网站：https://checkeigen.vercel.app/

  3. 空投再次进入高峰摘桃周期，几乎每天都有新项目领，建议装下 scam sniffer 等安全插件，别被黑客“黄雀在后”了。

推荐人：Wenser（X：@wenser 2010 ）

简介：币圈回本玩家，把钱还我我不玩了

分享：

  1. 看了下自己开多 CATI 的蚂蚁仓，还在，持续观察；

  2. Meme 币河马爆火，以太坊上面的比 Solana 上面的价格低很多，彩票仓观察；

  3. CELO 被 Vitalik 喊单后涨了 15% ，侧面反映出来市场现在还是跟着情绪在走，名人大 V 的影响力仍然是第一位的，从这个角度看，CZ 出狱后+国庆来临的节点一定会有百倍神盘出现，目前二级来看 EDU、HOOK 最有希望牵扯点关系；一级的话反而更看好 SunPump 可能出的盘子，还是观察。

  4. 如果对孙宇晨有期待的话，可以买点 SUNDOG、SUN。

  5. 另外，币安上线合约的小币种在第二天都可以尝试做空，小额收益。

往期记录

9 月 23 日

9 月 20 日

9 月 11 日

推荐阅读

本周必参与：StoryProtocol 新交互任务、MATR1X FIRE 打金、币安 TG 游戏 Moonbix、Corn 新 Galxe 任务

9 大远古巨鲸苏醒，暗示最后一轮加密牛市？

两千个聪明地址数据归纳以太坊 Meme 大赢家特征：钻石手还是 PvP | 南枳出品

Related Reads

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

Bitcoin has been rejected at a crucial long-term resistance level around $83,000, marking its first failure at this macro price point in five years. According to analyst Chiefy, this trendline has defined major cycle tops since 2021 and acted as a key support in early 2025. The recent rejection saw Bitcoin drop to $74,000 before a slight recovery to $76,580, aligning with a significant moving average historically linked to major market turns. If the current support around $74,000 breaks, the analyst projects three potential downside targets: $68,000, $61,000, and an extreme target near $48,000, which aligns with the weekly 350 MA. Market sentiment has shifted to fear, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index at 39, indicating growing caution among investors.

bitcoinist16m ago

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

bitcoinist16m ago

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Bankless founder David Hoffman explains his decision to sell all his ETH. He clarifies this is not due to bearishness on Ethereum itself, which he remains extremely optimistic about, but rather because he believes the core "ETH is Money" narrative he championed has already been priced in. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve status as a global reserve currency, Ethereum needed to execute perfectly across all layers—governance, technology, L2 coordination, and market dominance—faster than competitors. While Ethereum has performed admirably and earned its current valuation, the window for a fundamental revaluation of ETH upward has likely closed. Key factors include: the clear market correlation between L1 chain revenue/fees and native asset price (evident with SOL and NEAR); the failure of the "strong version" of crypto (ideological, self-sustaining) to maintain lasting mainstream appeal beyond a brief period; and the reality that Ethereum's architecture acts as a "giver," providing security and tokenization at cost, which benefits other monies (like stablecoins) as much as or more than ETH itself. He concludes that Ethereum's success will increasingly accrue to its applications and L2s (following a "fat app" theory), with ETH structurally positioned to capture only minimal value. Therefore, he sold to reallocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

marsbit33m ago

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

marsbit33m ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手37m ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手37m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit42m ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit42m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit42m ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片