【比推每日新闻精选】MicroStrategy 计划出售 7 亿美元可转换优先票据,以买入更多比特币;Gemini 创始人Winklevoss兄弟为本届美国大选最大的个人加密捐赠者, 共捐赠 1010 万美元;美联储本周降息50bp的概率高于25bp

比推Published on 2024-09-16Last updated on 2024-09-16

比推小编每日为您精选的Web3新闻:

MicroStrategy计划出售 7 亿美元可转换优先票据,以买入更多比特币】

比推消息,商业智能公司 MicroStrategy(股票代码:MSTR)宣布,该公司计划出售高达 7 亿美元的可转换优先票据,以资助额外的 BTC 购买并回购债务。

据悉,此次私募将“取决于市场情况”,并于 2028 年到期。这些票据将是 MicroStrategy 的无担保优先债务(一种没有抵押品支持的债务),每年支付两次利息。

截至 2024 年 6 月,MicroStrategy 的总债务为 39 亿美元。根据美国证券交易委员会的一份文件,该公司购买了价值近 100 亿美元的 244,800 BTC,其中包括上周购买了价值超过 10 亿美元的18,300 BTC。

Gemini创始人Winklevoss兄弟为本届美国大选最大的个人加密捐赠者, 共捐赠 1010 万美元】

比推消息,根据加密市场和区块链分析师James Delmore汇编的联邦选举委员会数据,并经CNBC独立核实,Gemini Trust Co.创始人Cameron WinklevossTyler Winklevoss是本届美国大选周期最大的个人加密捐赠者,共捐赠了1010万美元,每人捐赠略高于500万美元。

距离 11 月大选还有 50 天,来自加密行业或支持加密行业的政治捐款已高达 1.9 亿美元左右。

据报道,Winklevoss二人为特朗普筹集资金的特朗普47委员会捐赠了总计约170万美元的比特币,共计向支持特朗普的“让美国再次伟大”政治行动委员会捐赠了70多万美元,并向支持加密货币的两党合作政治行动委员会捐赠了490万美元。

【美联储本周降息50bp的概率高于25bp】

比推消息,据CME“美联储观察”:美联储9月降息25个基点的概率33.0%,降息50个基点的概率为67.0%。美联储到11月累计降息50个基点的概率为19.3%,累计降息75个基点的概率为52.9%,累计降息100个基点的概率为27.8%。

【数据:以太坊每日质押者收入的 7DMA 跌至 2 月中旬以来最低】

比推消息,The Block数据显示,9月12日,以太坊每日质押者收入的 7DMA (7 天移动平均线)跌至 544 万美元,创下 2 月中旬以来的最低水平。

以太坊上的质押者收入是指以太坊权益证明 (PoS) 共识机制的参与者通过验证交易和保护网络而获得的奖励和收益。这种收入通常通过区块奖励和交易费产生,这些奖励和交易费根据质押者质押的 ETH 数量按比例分配给质押者。这一指标的下降意味着质押者从参与网络中获得的收益减少,这可能受到网络活动减少等因素的影响,从而导致支付的交易费用减少。

【前Celsius首席执行官Alex Mashinsky面临 115 年监禁,寻求六名证人的证词】

比推消息,据The Block报道,前 Celsius 首席执行官Alex Mashinsky要求获取曾在该加密货币公司工作的六名证人的证词,因为他可能面临超过 100 年(115年)的监禁。

去年,检察官指控Mashinsky欺骗客户并误导他们了解 Celsius 的盈利能力,Mashinsky因此被捕。在他的律师周五提交的一份备忘录中,他请求纽约地区法院允许从这家加密货币贷款机构的首席财务官到首席营收官等证人在他的刑事审判中作证。他们说,许多拟议的证人居住在美国境外。

Celsius 于 2022 年申请破产,并于今年早些时候被关闭,2023 年 7 月,美国证券交易委员会起诉这家加密货币贷款机构和 Mashinsky,指控他们通过欺诈性和未经注册的加密货币销售筹集了数十亿美元,多次向投资者谎报 Celsius 的财务状况,并操纵该公司的原生代币 CEL 的价格。

Vitalik Buterin:独立质押者可能是以太坊长期安全的关键】

比推消息,Vitalik Buterin在2024年新加坡以太坊大会上表示,“独立质押者(Solo Stakers)可能是以太坊长期安全的关键,是以太坊去中心化的重要支柱”。

据悉,通过独立质押,他们减少了对大型机构的依赖,并保护网络免受中心化控制。另外一个好处是防御 51% 攻击,即使只质押了少量的ETH,独立质押者也能让任何单一实体更难接管网络或执行 51% 攻击。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

比推 Btok 订阅: https://btok360.com/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手4h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手4h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手4h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手4h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit4h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片