【比推一周web3新闻精选】Michael Saylor重申比特币将在未来20年内上涨至1300万美元;灰度将推出首个美国XRP信托,为潜在ETF铺平道路;美众议员提出新法案,拟在SEC与CFTC之间建立数字资产联合咨询委员会

比推Published on 2024-09-14Last updated on 2024-09-14

比推一周Web3新闻精选:

【Michael Saylor 重申比特币将在未来20年内上涨至1300万美元】

比推消息,MicroStrategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 在接受 CNBC 采访时重申了他的观点,即目前占全球资本 0.1% 的比特币最终将升至全球资本的 7%,未来 20 年内,一枚比特币的价值将达到 1300 万美元。

MicroStrategy于 2020 年 8 月开始购买比特币,目前以当前价格持有价值约 83 亿美元的比特币资产。

【卡马拉·哈里斯公布拟议政策立场清单,未提及加密相关议题】

比推消息,美国民主党总统候选人卡马拉·哈里斯的竞选网站公布了她未来总统政府拟议的政策立场清单,其中未提及加密相关话题。

在其竞选网站的新问题页面上,部分文字提到了支持“美国创新和工人”。其中,这位民主党候选人承诺支持人工智能行业的发展,并强调培育“未来其他尖端产业”的重要性。

【自 2013 年以来,美SEC已对加密货币行业处以 74 亿美元的罚款】

比推消息,根据 Social Capital Markets 发布的一项研究,自 2013 年以来,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)已对加密货币行业处以 74 亿美元的罚款。

报告称,随着 Terraform Labs 今年早些时候同意支付 44.7 亿美元,2024 年的罚款总额已超过往年,达到 47 亿美元。不过,报告还称,开出的罚单总数从去年的 30 起下降到 11 起,当时 SEC 对加密行业处以总计 1.5 亿美元的罚款。

Social Capital Markets 在其报告中表示:“罚款金额的总体增加表明,公司正朝着更少、影响更大的案件的战略转变。这一变化强调了加密货币公司需要优先考虑监管合规性,因为与违规相关的财务风险已经升级。”

【英国提出新法案,旨在明确加密货币、NFT的法律地位】

比推消息,据 Coindesk 报道,英国政府向议会提交了一项法案,涉及加密货币、非同质化代币(NFT)和代币化现实世界资产(RWA)等数字资产的法律地位。

该法案将明确规定,根据英国法律,这些资产被视为个人财产。一旦颁布,它将为法律界在发生所有权纠纷(例如离婚时)时提供可遵循的指导方针。它还将为遭受欺诈和诈骗的加密货币所有者(无论是个人还是公司)提供保护。

该提案的核心是,除了现有的“持有物”外,还增加了一个新的财产类别,其中包括金钱和汽车等物品,以及债务和股票等“things in action”类别。

【灰度将推出首个美国XRP信托,为潜在ETF铺平道路】

比推消息,据福克斯商业新闻(FOX BUSINESS)报道,灰度将推出首个美国 XRP 信托,为潜在 ETF 铺平道路。

据悉,灰度宣布将推出的首个 XRP 信托是一种封闭式基金,将为合格投资者提供直接投资 XRP 的机会。信托和 ETF 是两种不同的投资产品。ETF 必须获得美国证券交易委员会的批准,因为它直接面向散户投资者销售,而信托的结构和对合格投资者的销售宣传则受到较宽松的监管。即便如此,只要获得适当的监管批准,信托也可以成为 ETF。

【美众议员提出新法案,拟在SEC与CFTC之间建立数字资产联合咨询委员会】

比推消息,据福克斯新闻记者Eleanor Terrett报道,田纳西州共和党众议员 John Rose 是美国众议院金融服务共和党委员会的成员,他正在提出一项名为「BRIDGE 数字资产法案」的新法案,该法案将在美国证券交易委员会(SEC)和美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)之间建立一个数字资产联合咨询委员会,该委员会的目的是让行业向这两个机构提供有关数字资产相关规则、法规和政策的建议。

该委员会将由 20 名私营部门参与者组成,他们将代表加密领域的不同利益。

【彭博社:自 2022 年以来美 SEC 主席曾多次遭遇“死亡威胁”】

比推消息,彭博社记者 Jason Leopold 根据《信息自由法》(FOIA)提出的请求显示,自 2022 年以来美 SEC 主席 Gary Gensler 曾多次遭遇“死亡威胁”。文件显示,一些人向 Gensler发送语音信息和电子邮件,其中包含针对他的粗鲁暴力威胁,但没有任何解释。一个人说他们会开枪并“砍死他”,另一个人则威胁说,如果继续发送这些信息,他们就会被起诉。

《信息自由法》文件显示,其中一封死亡威胁可能来自一名政府雇员,而另一名向 Gensler 发送了一封主题为“去死”的威胁邮件的人住在澳大利亚。美国检察官办公室拒绝对后一案件提起刑事指控。

自 2021 年起,Gensler 在总统乔·拜登的领导下担任 SEC 主席。尽管他的任期将于 2026 年结束,但一些专家表示,如果美国大选结果有利于民主党候选人卡马拉·哈里斯或特朗普,可能会促使 SEC 主席辞职。


说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手2h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手2h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手2h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手2h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit2h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片