ADA价格将下跌33%、现在是否适合做空ADA?

金色财经Published on 2024-09-13Last updated on 2024-09-13

ADA在过去24小时内下跌了 0.59 %,目前接近关键的 0.3544 美元关口,日线图显示 ADAUSDT 看跌。

然而,鉴于整个加密货币市场的横向走势,它似乎处于盘整期。由于价格已在 0.35 阻力位下方形成区间,因此价格可能会下跌需要重新测试支撑区域。

建议做空ADA

随着 ADA 接近并在关键的 0.35 美元支撑位下方盘整,该代币显得很脆弱。目前整个加密货币市场仍然处于横盘整理状态,由于未能突破目前的区间,ADA 面临额外的下行压力。

从日线时间尺度来看,ADA 目前处于 0.30 美元至 0.34 美元之间。在日线图中,形成了一根十字星蜡烛,这通常表明市场对任何一个方向都没有信心。我认为,如果这是市场所期待的情景,那么可能会重新测试 0.325 美元左右或该区域的支撑位。

即使价格在当前区间内稳定下来时交易者可能会发现机会,但态度仍然不利。

此外,如果 ADA 无法维持在 0.325 美元的支撑位上方,则有可能进一步下跌至 0.30 美元区域。

ADA 将下跌 33% 至 0.2197 美元?

随着交易量的增加,ADA 刚刚突破了上涨楔形,尽管这并不是许多人预期的积极突破。

研究表明,卡尔达诺正在通过缩小 EMA200 线和看跌趋势线下方的缺口来加强日线图上的强劲负面趋势,形成了一个上涨楔形模式,但一系列强劲的看跌蜡烛在其突破之前就将其击垮了。

此外,MACD 还包含一个看跌交叉,为市场增添了活力。这并不是多头所期待的,卡尔达诺只是遭遇了暴跌,突破了上涨楔形,交易量大幅上涨。

比起这些,还有更糟糕的是,MACD 线低于信号线,这表明空头变得更加悲观。

BCqhP9JDqoRmEc267XQm2o2NKXhLuZIze7vSI4iZ.jpeg

由于所有这些迹象都是负面的,我预测ADA可能会跌至目标区域 1 的 0.2506 或目标区域 2 的更大跌幅 0.2197(这些目标是使用斐波那契比率 1.272 和 1.618 绘制的)。

不过,这种情况一直在变化,因此,如果 ADA 价格突破阻力位 0.3815,那么多头就可以抱有一些希望。

最后,投资加密货币是一种高风险的行为。我们需要谨慎对待投资决策,做好充分的研究和风险评估。同时,我们也需要保持冷静的头脑,不被市场的波动所左右,做出符合自己投资策略的决策。

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手24m ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手24m ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手35m ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手35m ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit41m ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit41m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片