Singapore Bans Use Of Crypto In Gambling To Curb Illicit Activity

bitcoinistPublished on 2024-09-12Last updated on 2024-09-12

Abstract

The dangers of money laundering and other associated crimes have Singaporean authorities stopping the use of crypto for gambling. Related...

The dangers of money laundering and other associated crimes have Singaporean authorities stopping the use of crypto for gambling.

Singapore’s parliament has passed amendments to the Casino Control Act, designed to further enhance the effectiveness of the country’s casino regulatory regime and its safeguards for the more vulnerable sections of its population.

In tabling the changes, outlined in detail in a speech made by a government minister, Singapore continues its “fine balance” between reaping economic benefits from Integrated Resorts (IRs) and minimizing gambling-related harms.

Strengthening Regulatory Supervision

The amendments make some key changes to Singapore’s regulatory framework for casinos. More powers will be given to the GRA to regulate more forms of gambling activities within casinos, including betting and lotteries. This will prevent the regulatory regime from becoming obsolete in the light of potential new offerings by casino operators.

Divestments and acquisitions with respect to primary shareholders of casino operators will be sanctioned by the Minister for Home Affairs. The move is supposed to align IRs with the strategic objectives of the government. The Gambling Regulatory Authority, for its part, will take decisions concerning controllers and substantial shareholders with the aim of thwarting undesirable criminal influence in casinos.

The amendments being implemented by the Singaporean parliament cover digital currency. For one, cryptocurrency will not be licensed by GRA for use as casino chips. Officials cited money laundering risks as the primary reason for this ban. 

As of today, the market cap of cryptocurrencies stood at $1.9 trillion. Chart: TradingView.com

The amendments also provide for stiffer penalties for specified infringements. Certain infractions which attracted only monetary fines are now subject to imprisonment, bringing this Casino Control Act in line with the recently passed Gambling Control Act.

Protecting Vulnerable Groups

One of the major focuses of the revisions is to further strengthen the safeguards for vulnerable persons. The NCPG shall have greater leeway in dealing with exclusion orders and visit limits.

It has also enhanced the punishment for minors who try to enter casinos using false proof of age. Fines for the offense have been increased from $1,000 to $10,000, reflecting how seriously these infractions are taken by the authorities.

However the government claims that existing social safeguards such as orders for exclusion and limits on visits despite increased measures have proven their worth. The probable pathological and so-called “problem gambling” rates among Singapore residents remain low and stable at about 1%.

Balancing Economic Growth And Social Responsibility

The Singapore crypto and casino regulation system is always under development because the city-state is trying to find the best balance in maximizing economic returns from its IRs, while simultaneously trying to minimize their associated social harms.

Recently, the government updated the casino tax rates to include a multi-tiered system, one which features higher rates than previously existed. This balances competitiveness with the need for revenue generation.

Featured image from CNN, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Related Reads

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit48m ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片