Nearly 90% Of Crypto Firms Fail UK’s AML Standards—What’s Going Wrong?

bitcoinistPublished on 2024-09-06Last updated on 2024-09-07

Abstract

The turbulent UK cryptocurrency landscape sees the Financial Conduct Authority report that 87% of crypto registration applications failed in the...

The turbulent UK cryptocurrency landscape sees the Financial Conduct Authority report that 87% of crypto registration applications failed in the last fiscal year.

This is a staggering fact that brings up very serious questions concerning the effectiveness of anti-money laundering controls in the industry. Only four out of 35 applications were approved, underlining how tough the regulatory environment remains.

Struggling To Meet Standards

The FCA has been acting as the regulator for crypto businesses since January 2020, overseeing compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Transfer of Funds Regulations.

Overall, the report states that this high number of firms falls short of the required standard. This was because most applications were refused on the grounds of unsatisfactory fraud and AML controls necessary for assurance that illicit funds do not penetrate the financial system.

The UK FCA denied the applications of nearly 90% of crypto registrations. Source: FCA

FCA Chair Charles Randell commented:

“Although some firms have shown adequate systems, too many have failed to meet acceptable standards of risk management and controls to date, leading to this wave of rejections and withdrawals.”

But the new European Union regulations, including Markets in Crypto-Assets, or MiCA framework, have made things even more complex. While these rules aim at better regulating crypto assets, they also add further layers of complexity to UK firms already battling local compliance issues.

With rules yet to be implemented, many are wondering if the UK will still be a viable market for crypto operations.

A New Era Of Regulation

The FCA report contributes to the larger initiative aiming at increasing regulatory control of the crypto sector. This also entails the building of a new “Crypto Cell” at the National Crime Agency with more authority to handle crimes connected to cryptocurrencies.

This division will be responsible for investigations and law enforcement support; this therefore reinforces the government’s commitment to stamping out financial crime in this fast-changing sector.

Total crypto market cap currently at $1.9 trillion. Chart: TradingView

However, the FCA has been so strict in its stance that crypto firms are growing frustrated. Many have complained of months of delays and inadequate feedback within the registration process.

Some firms have decided to go overseas in search of easier legal environments for their operations, nonetheless serving UK clients. This issue raises questions about UK competitiveness in the crypto space, at least for companies seeking friendlier regimes for their activities.

The Future Of Crypto In The UK

Under the incoming Labor government, the future of crypto legislation rests in the balance; the UK government has put plans involving cryptocurrencies on the sidelines.

Although the FCA intends to assist companies through the registration procedure, the significant failure rate indicates a long way to go for establishing confidence and system clarity.

Pressure is mounting for authorities and companies to strike a suitable balance between compliance and creativity as only 44 companies effectively registered since the FCA started supervising the sector.

While incoming rules under MiCA could provide a path towards improved governance, the UK’s crypto scene is probably going to stay problematic until then.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Related Reads

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbit1h ago

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbit1h ago

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbit1h ago

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbit1h ago

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

Chinese CPO stocks plunged over 6% following Corning's announcement of its Glass Bridge platform at a Seoul tech conference. The new technology utilizes wafer-level glass ion-exchange waveguides for passive alignment between fibers and photonic chips, potentially simplifying traditional CPO architectures that rely on complex Fiber Array Units and active alignment equipment. This raised market concerns about reduced long-term demand for mid-stream CPO components. Corning's official documentation details Glass Bridge as a platform for fiber-to-PIC connectivity in NPO, CPO, and high-density modules. Its key features include wafer-level manufacturing for consistent, cost-effective production; a standardized, removable MT ferrule interface for ecosystem integration; and a separable high-density connector design supporting over 24 channels for assembly flexibility. Corning positions the technology as complementary to FAUs, addressing limitations in ultra-high-fiber-count scenarios. The market reaction reflects a broader reassessment of the AI optical interconnect value chain. Funds shifted from CPO and PCB manufacturing stocks towards glass substrate concept stocks like Kaisheng Technology and Dyer Laser. Analysts note glass substrates are seen as a next-gen advanced packaging material, offering a potential path for domestic industry differentiation amid AI-driven demand for high-performance, large-scale packaging, marking a structural migration in value towards upstream specialty materials.

marsbit1h ago

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片