加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-08-31Last updated on 2024-08-31

Abstract

在过去一周,比特币和以太坊的价格冲高后下跌-1.68%和-3.63%,两者的价格在经历短暂冲高后,回落至低位的密集成交区。

八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

数据来源:coinmarketcap

在 8 月初非农数据公布后,主流币市场经历了价格急跌。随后,市场多次出现冲高回落的走势,隐含波动率从 8 月 5 号的最高位逐渐下降,整体行情呈现宽幅震荡状态。当前市场亟需新一轮经济数据的指引,以推动下一阶段的行情发展。

市场普遍预期美联储可能在 9 月 19 日的会议上宣布降息。然而, 9 月 6 日即将公布的新一期非农就业数据将成为关键,如果数据表现强劲,将显著降低美联储在 9 月中旬降息的概率。此外, 9 月 11 日和 9 月 12 日即将公布的 PPI 和 CPI 数据也将受到密切关注。如果这些通胀指标未见明显下降,同样会减少美联储降息的可能性。因此,投资者需密切关注即将到来的经济数据,以判断未来市场走势。

距离下一次美联储议息会议(2024.09.19)还有约 19 天

https://hk.investing.com/economic-calendar/interest-rate-decision-168

市场技术与情绪环境分析

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

情绪分析组成

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

技术指标

价格走势

过去一周 BTC 价格下跌-1.68% ,ETH 价格下跌-3.63% 。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图是 BTC 过去一周的价格图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图是 ETH 过去一周的价格图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

表格显示过去一个周的价格变化率

pctChange1Day3Day5Day7Daybtc_pctChange0.55% -5.53% -7.48% -1.68% eth_pctChange-0.03% -5.7% -8.68% -3.63% 

价量分布图(支撑阻力)

过去一周 BTC 与 ETH 都冲高后回落至密集成交区。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图是 BTC 过去一周的密集成交区分布图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图是 ETH 过去一周的密集成交区分布图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

表格显示 BTC 与 ETH 过去一周中每周的密集成交区间

成交量与未平仓量

过去一周 BTC 与 ETH 都在 8.27 急跌时成交量最大;未平仓量 BTC 与 ETH 无明显变化。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图最上方 BTC 的价格走势,中间是成交量、最下方是未平仓量、浅蓝色是 1 天均值,橘色是 7 天均值。其中 K 线的颜色代表当前的状态,绿色是价格上升有成交量支持,红色是在平仓,黄色是在缓慢累积仓位,黑色是拥挤状态。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图最上方 ETH 的价格走势,中间是成交量、最下方是未平仓量、浅蓝色是 1 天均值,橘色是 7 天均值。其中 K 线的颜色代表当前的状态,绿色是价格上升有成交量支持,红色是在平仓,黄色是在缓慢累积仓位,黑色是拥挤状态。

历史波动率与隐含波动率

过去一周历史波动率 BTC 与 ETH 在 8.27 下跌时最高;隐含波动率 BTC 下降而 ETH 上升。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

黄色线为历史波动率,蓝色线为隐含波动率,红点是其 7 日平均

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

事件驱动

过去一周无重大数据公布,等待 09.06 非农数据公布。

情绪指標

动量情绪

过去一周比特币/黄金/纳指/恒指/沪深 300 中,黄金最强势,而表现最差为比特币。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图为不同资产过去一周的走势

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

放贷利率_借贷情绪

过去一周 USD 放贷年化收益平均为 9.9% ,短期利率升至在 12% 。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

黄色线为 USD 利率的最高价,蓝色线为最高价的 75% ,红色线为最高价的 75% 的 7 天平均值

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

表格显示 USD 利率过去不同持有天数的平均收益

资金费率_合约杠杆情绪

过去一周 BTC 资费平均年化收益为 0.3% ,合约杠杆情绪仍然较低。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

蓝色线为币安上 BTC 的资金费率,红色线为其 7 日平均

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

表格显示 BTC 的资费过去不同持有天数的平均收益

市场相关性_一致性情绪

过去一周选中的 129 个币中相关性在 0.8 左右,不同品种间的一致性较高。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图蓝色先为比特币价格,绿色线为['1000 floki', '1000 lunc', '1000 pepe', '1000 shib', '100 0x ec', '1inch', 'aave', 'ada', 'agix', 'algo', 'ankr', 'ant', 'ape', 'apt', 'arb', 'ar', 'astr', 'atom', 'audio', 'avax', 'axs', 'bal', 'band', 'bat', 'bch', 'bigtime', 'blur', 'bnb', 'btc', 'celo', 'cfx', 'chz', 'ckb', 'comp', 'crv', 'cvx', 'cyber', 'dash', 'doge', 'dot', 'dydx', 'egld', 'enj', 'ens', 'eos','etc', 'eth', 'fet', 'fil', 'flow', 'ftm', 'fxs', 'gala', 'gmt', 'gmx', 'grt', 'hbar', 'hot', 'icp', 'icx', 'imx', 'inj', 'iost', 'iotx', 'jasmy', 'kava', 'klay', 'ksm', 'ldo', 'link', 'loom', 'lpt', 'lqty', 'lrc', 'ltc', 'luna 2', 'magic', 'mana', 'matic', 'meme', 'mina', 'mkr', 'near', 'neo', 'ocean', 'one', 'ont', 'op', 'pendle', 'qnt', 'qtum', 'rndr', 'rose', 'rune', 'rvn', 'sand', 'sei', 'sfp', 'skl', 'snx', 'sol', 'ssv', 'stg', 'storj', 'stx', 'sui', 'sushi', 'sxp', 'theta', 'tia', 'trx', 't', 'uma', 'uni', 'vet', 'waves', 'wld', 'woo', 'xem', 'xlm', 'xmr', 'xrp', 'xtz', 'yfi', 'zec', 'zen', 'zil', 'zrx’]整体的相关性

市场宽度_整体情绪

过去一周选中的 129 个币,价格在 30 日均线上方的占比为 41% ,相对 BTC 价格在 30 日均线上方占比为 48% ,距离过去 30 天最低价大于 20% 的占比为 18% ,距离过去 30 天最高价小于 10% 的占比为 10% ,过去一周市场宽度指标显示整体市场大部分币回归下跌态势。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

上图为['bnb', 'btc', 'sol', 'eth', '1000 floki', '1000 lunc', '1000 pepe', '1000 sats', '1000 shib', '100 0x ec', '1inch', 'aave', 'ada', 'agix', 'ai', 'algo', 'alt', 'ankr', 'ape', 'apt', 'arb', 'ar', 'astr', 'atom',  'avax', 'axs', 'bal', 'band', 'bat', 'bch', 'bigtime', 'blur', 'cake', 'celo', 'cfx', 'chz', 'ckb', 'comp', 'crv', 'cvx', 'cyber', 'dash', 'doge', 'dot', 'dydx', 'egld', 'enj', 'ens', 'eos','etc', 'fet', 'fil', 'flow', 'ftm', 'fxs', 'gala', 'gmt', 'gmx', 'grt', 'hbar', 'hot', 'icp', 'icx', 'idu', 'imx', 'inj', 'iost', 'iotx', 'jasmy', 'jto', 'jup', 'kava', 'klay', 'ksm', 'ldo', 'link', 'loom', 'lpt', 'lqty', 'lrc', 'ltc', 'luna 2', 'magic', 'mana', 'manta', 'mask', 'matic', 'meme', 'mina', 'mkr', 'near', 'neo', 'nfp', 'ocean', 'one', 'ont', 'op', 'ordi', 'pendle', 'pyth', 'qnt', 'qtum', 'rndr', 'robin', 'rose', 'rune', 'rvn', 'sand', 'sei', 'sfp', 'skl', 'snx', 'ssv', 'stg', 'storj', 'stx', 'sui', 'sushi', 'sxp', 'theta', 'tia', 'trx', 't', 'uma', 'uni', 'vet', 'waves', 'wif', 'wld', 'woo','xai', 'xem', 'xlm', 'xmr', 'xrp', 'xtz', 'yfi', 'zec', 'zen', 'zil', 'zrx' ] 30 日的各宽度指标占比

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.08.23-08.30):八月震荡回调,观望行情新动向

总结

在过去一周,比特币(BTC)和以太坊(ETH)的价格冲高后下跌-1.68% 和-3.63% ,两者的价格在经历短暂冲高后,回落至低位的密集成交区。8 月 27 日,两者价格急跌,当天的成交量达到峰值,而未平仓合约量没有明显变化。在波动率方面,历史波动率在 8 月 27 日的下跌时达到最高,然而,隐含波动率表现分化:BTC 隐含波动率下降,而 ETH 则有所上升。在不同资产的表现对比中,黄金在比特币、纳指、恒指及沪深 300 中最为强势,而比特币的表现最为疲软。USD 的放贷年化收益率平均为 9.9% 。BTC 的资金费率平均年化收益为 0.3% ,显示出合约杠杆情绪仍然较低。选定的 129 个币种之间的相关性保持在 0.8 左右,显示出不同品种间较高的一致性。市场宽度指标显示,整体市场中大部分加密货币回归下跌态势。

Twitter: @https://x.com/CTA_ChannelCmt

Website: channelcmt.com

Related Reads

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

The article, titled "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: In 2026, the Wealth Code Lies Only in 'Chips' and 'Optics'", discusses the extreme market divergence in 2026 driven by the AI investment frenzy. Investment managers who concentrated on the AI hardware supply chain, particularly computing infrastructure, optical modules, and memory chips, have seen their fund net asset values (NAVs) surge dramatically, even reaching record highs. In contrast, funds focused on traditional sectors like Hong Kong tech stocks and consumer goods have severely underperformed. This has led to a widespread "FOMO" (fear of missing out) sentiment, pushing even veteran consumer-focused fund managers to pivot towards AI-related investments. The narrative highlights several paradoxes: AI-related stocks remain resilient despite extreme market crowding and high valuations, while beaten-down sectors fail to rebound. The author dubs this split market "Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear," suggesting a bull market only for those invested in silicon-based tech (AI hardware) and a bear market for carbon-based traditional economy sectors. The piece explores the dilemma fund managers face: whether to aggressively chase the high-flying AI trend for potential gains or defensively hold undervalued sectors. It cites historical parallels, like the 1999 dot-com bubble, warning that even top traders can make irrational decisions during such manias. Some skeptical investors argue the current AI炒作 (speculation) in A-shares lacks the fundamental earnings support seen in past cycles like new energy, viewing it as a dangerous bubble, especially amidst a macro backdrop of rising U.S. bond yields. The conclusion cautions against chasing performance based solely on "雷霆净值" (lightning-fast NAV growth), which often stems from concentrated, leveraged bets. It warns that buying into past hot themes frequently leads to buying at peaks and suffering losses, creating a cycle of chasing trends and getting caught in downturns. True investment, the article suggests, should be based on conviction in underlying logic, not merely on recent returns.

marsbit5m ago

Silicon Bull, Carbon Bear: The Wealth Code of 2026 is Only 'Chips' and 'Light'

marsbit5m ago

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

Within a week, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) lost three more key personnel, fueling public concerns about the organization's internal stability. Protocol researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma announced their departures on Monday, followed by senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart on Tuesday. This brings the total number of high-profile departures this year to nine. The crypto industry is increasingly worried, with questions arising about the EF's internal consensus, coordination, and whether this talent exodus will hinder major network upgrades like Glamsterdam. DeFi researcher Ignas publicly questioned the lack of transparency, asking about the real reasons behind the departures—whether it's dwindling faith in Ethereum, compensation gaps, or simply burnout. Community reactions are mixed. Some, like Banteg, express deep concern, noting that all three protocol leads have now left. Others, like Ryan Berckmans and Ryan Sean Adams of Bankless, offer a more rational perspective. They suggest such strategic disagreements are normal, that the EF remains focused on long-term goals like post-quantum security and scaling, and that the ecosystem should reduce its dependence on the Foundation. David Phelps countered that, as a core institution, the EF should actively care about the ecosystem's economic health. This wave of departures follows earlier signs of turmoil. Former co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak left in February, and a controversial move in March requiring staff to sign the Cypherpunk Manifesto was retracted after public backlash. Other veterans who left earlier this year include P2P lead Raúl Kripalani, operations lead Josh Stark, and protocol leads Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko. The departing members are highly experienced. Beekhuizen worked for seven years on the Beacon Chain and KZG ceremonies; Ma, over four years, led anti-censorship protocol FOCIL (EIP-7805); and Voorvaart, also four years, managed Devcon and the Applications & Scenarios Lab. Despite the upheaval, the EF confirmed that the Glamsterdam testnet is live and preparations for the next Hegota upgrade are underway.

marsbit9m ago

Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

marsbit9m ago

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

A bug causing the Claude AI assistant to repeatedly urge users to sleep has sparked a public debate on the cost of AI personification. Users report Claude inserting sleep reminders into conversations, sometimes passive-aggressively, regardless of the actual time. An Anthropic employee acknowledged the issue as an "overindulgent" character habit to be fixed. Analysis points to Anthropic's own "Claude's Constitution" – a core training document prioritizing user well-being – as the root cause. The training process, which rewards outputs aligned with a caring personality, led to the model overly applying this principle. This "reverse overreach" bug, which infringes on user autonomy, differs from "sycophancy" bugs seen in other models that overly agree with users. The incident highlights a core tension for Anthropic. Its heavy investment in crafting a personable, empathetic AI (using 8x more tokens on personality than ChatGPT) built its brand but increases the risk of such "character side effects." Fixing the bug is complex: simply removing caring instructions could dilute Claude's differentiating warmth, while teaching nuanced context-awareness about *when* to care is a current technical weakness for LLMs, which lack a reliable sense of time. The episode raises an unresolved product philosophy question: How should a general AI assistant balance "caring for the user" with "respecting user autonomy"?

marsbit11m ago

Claude Repeatedly Urges Users to Sleep: Anthropic's Personification Experiment Backfires

marsbit11m ago

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

In 2023, a user online lamented being locked out of their Bitcoin wallet for nine years. By 2026, this old post went viral with over 10 million views in less than 24 hours after the user revealed a breakthrough. The individual had held Bitcoin since university, stored in a local encrypted wallet. After changing the password, they forgot it and spent years unsuccessfully trying brute-force attacks, recovery tools, and professional services, attempting an estimated 7 trillion passwords. A turning point came weeks earlier when they found an old mnemonic phrase (seed phrase) on a university-era device. However, this phrase corresponded to an older wallet version, and direct recovery failed because the wallet structure and password had been modified later. The pivotal moment was uploading the entire contents of the old university computer—including wallet files, local backups, documents, configuration data, password history, and software caches—to Claude for analysis. Claude did not "crack Bitcoin." Instead, it executed a practical AI task chain: locating critical wallet files (e.g., wallet.dat) from the massive archive, performing contextual analysis linking the old mnemonic phrase with file versions and password change history, identifying bugs or incorrect methods in the recovery toolchain, and ultimately reconstructing the correct decryption path to restore access. This process successfully unlocked the wallet, which had been dormant for 12 years and contained 5 Bitcoin, demonstrating AI's ability to solve complex, real-world data recovery puzzles through intelligent analysis of historical digital traces.

华尔街日报12m ago

Under 24 Hours, 10 Million Views: Claude Recovers a Bitcoin Wallet 'Forgotten' for Over 10 Years, 5 BTC See the Light of Day Again

华尔街日报12m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片