赛璐珞引入可编程激励层,将资产发行游戏化

币界网Published on 2024-08-15Last updated on 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

为了应对加密货币领域公平资产分配和去中心化的挑战,Cellula推出了基于以太坊虚拟机(EVM)生态系统的创新可编程激励层。赛璐珞创新的核心是其虚拟工作量证明(vPOW)共识机制,该机制结合了康威生命游戏、可变速率GDAs算法和博弈论的原理,彻底改变了数字资产的分配和流动性的分配方式。

加密货币行业长期以来一直在努力解决“鲸鱼”问题——一小群个人或实体积累了不成比例的资产份额,导致市场操纵、权力下放减少,以及小投资者的参与机会有限。此外,传统的资产分配方法,如预开采,进一步集中了所有权,破坏了这些生态系统的公平性和可及性。

赛璐珞团队表示:“我们已经厌倦了女巫和猎人之间的战争。”。“Cellula试图通过将BTC工作量证明机制重新引入EVM兼容网络,通过虚拟工作量证明(vPOW)开创资产分配和流动性分配指导,来解决这些双重挑战。”

Cellula的vPOW机制赋予“BitLife”实体独特的哈希率,使他们能够参与游戏化的挖掘过程,从而产生动态激励。这种革命性的方法得益于Cellula的三大创新算法:用于采矿的Conway生命游戏、用于定价的可变利率GDA(VRGDA)以及用于公平分配和流动性指导的Analysoor协议。

挖掘算法-康威的生命游戏-链上数字生命的遗传密码:康威的“生命游戏”支撑着赛璐珞的链上实体“BitLife”,它动态进化,反映了自然生命周期,并使区块链内的复杂人工智能开发成为可能。这种游戏化的挖矿过程鼓励参与者制定更优化的策略,以潜在地获得额外的区块奖励,从而营造一个竞争环境,确保只奖励投入的资源。

定价算法-可变速率GDA-NFT分配的动态定价:VRGDA根据需求调整资产价格,当销售额高时增加,当销售额滞后时减少,即使在流动性不足的市场中也能确保均衡的分配。这种动态定价模式有助于防止资产集中在少数人手中,促进更广泛的参与和更公平的分配。

共识算法-Analysor-公平资产分配和流动性指导:Analysor是Solana上的公平启动协议,它使用块哈希作为随机数生成器,公平分配NFT和代币。与传统模式不同,它通过提供固定成本的“区块彩票”参与,避免了高昂的天然气费用和竞标战。每张票的区块哈希透明地决定了获胜者,防止了机器人,并确保所有用户都有平等的机会,无论经济实力如何。彩票交易费用于向新资产注入流动性,促进生态系统增长。将Analysoor与vPOW集成还可以提供更公平的资产分配和更好的流动性分配指导。

Cellula团队解释说:“Cellula的vPOW机制真正改变了游戏规则。”。“通过无缝集成这些尖端技术,我们创建了一个可编程的激励层,有望重塑去中心化金融和链上参与的未来。”

赛璐珞与众不同的关键特征之一是其无需许可的性质。vPOW机制允许网络中的任何参与者(矿工)通过铸造和向Bitlife收费来获得奖励,而不需要中央机构来分配资源。这种方法确保了更开放和透明的资产分配过程,促进了更大的权力下放和可访问性。

透明度也是赛璐珞设计的基石。所有算法和资产分配过程都记录在链上,使任何人都能够验证和审查该过程,从而提高了系统的透明度和可信度。

Cellula团队表示:“Cellula即将迎来链上参与和价值创造的新时代。”。“通过无缝集成这些创新技术,我们正在重新定义资产分配和流动性分配的方式,为更公平和去中心化的加密生态系统铺平道路。”

凭借其应对资产分配和去中心化挑战的全面方法,Cellula将彻底改变加密货币行业处理这些关键问题的方式。随着该项目的不断发展和范围的扩大,它仍然是未来的希望灯塔,公平透明的资产分配是常态,而不是例外。

关于赛璐珞

Cellula是一个开创性的可编程激励层,它彻底改变了以太坊虚拟机(EVM)上的资产发行。利用一种新颖的虚拟工作量证明(vPOW)共识机制,Cellula结合了Conway的生命游戏、可变速率GDA算法和博弈论的原理,创建了进化、智能和可编程的链上数字实体,称为BitLifes。

有关Cellula及其突破性的可编程激励层的更多信息,用户可以访问该项目的Gitbookhttps://cellulalifegame.gitbook.io/cellula.

Related Reads

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1h ago

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片