Coinbase谴责美国证券交易委员会的“非理性”规则制定,DEX是否受到威胁?

币界网Published on 2024-08-13Last updated on 2024-08-13

币界网报道:

Coinbase向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交了第三封信,讨论了对定义的拟议修改。这家美国最大的交易所对监管机构扩大“交易所”定义的提议表示担忧

Coinbase认为,委员会缺乏足够的数据来进行准确的成本效益分析,而是依赖于有缺陷的推理。加密货币平台敦促美国证券交易委员会撤回该提案,并在继续进行之前进行彻底研究。

Coinbase抨击SEC的“交易所”定义

Coinbase首席法务官Paul Grewal在一篇X帖子中宣布,该交易所已开始对美国证券交易委员会的“交易所”定义进行审查。他表示,该委员会缺乏批判性分析,也没有断言存在任何需要监管的问题。

他提到,美国证券交易委员会未能收集到一些基本信息,也没有对该提案对去中心化交易所(DEX)的影响进行任何经济分析。据称,监管机构正在推行其非理性的假设。

在Coinbase提交的信中,Grewal批评了美国证券交易委员会提出的规则变更,强调根据《行政程序法》和1934年《交易法》,成本效益分析是强制性的。

Coinbase的首席法律官建议,美国证券交易委员会应拒绝将拟议的规则扩展到DEX,因为这可能会给数百万从事数字资产的美国人带来严重后果。然而,他也暗示了这可能对不断增长的DEX市场的创新带来的危害。

Grewal呼吁委员会努力证明市场上存在这个问题。美国证券交易委员会从一个假设开始,即该行业存在一些需要纠正的问题。这封信表明,监管机构没有提供一个真实世界的例子,说明DEX伤害了谁,以及拟议规则将如何纠正这种具体伤害。他指出,这不是制定规则的方式,该提案需要撤回和纠正。

Coinbase批评监管机构的努力

Coinbase正在向美国最大的金融监管机构提交关于数字资产规则制定政策的背对背建议。早些时候,它反对CFTC提出的预测市场规则,并辩称这些规则超出了该机构的法定权限。

Grewal批评了提案中“游戏”的宽泛定义。他建议,它可能会不公正地禁止某些活动合同,并敦促CFTC撤回该提案,使其与CEA保持一致。在最近的一项举措中,该交易所还解决了委员会拒绝提供其对数字资产及其自身监管范围的不一致观点的完整记录的问题。

Related Reads

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit6m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit6m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片