Krafton收购Tango Gameworks,使工作室免于倒闭

币界网Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

币界网报道:

Krafton股份有限公司收购了热门Hi-Fi Rush游戏的开发商Tango Gameworks,使其免于关闭。收购协议使Krafton拥有Hi-Fi Rush的知识产权,但不包括Tango目录中的其他游戏,如《Ghostwire Tokyo》和《The Evil Within》。

今年早些时候,微软宣布将关闭Arkane Austin和总部位于日本的Tango Gameworks,作为整个组织重组的一部分。鉴于Hi-Fi Rush IP的成功,关闭其唯一的日本工作室受到了广泛批评。在Krafton的新所有权下,Tango Gameworks将继续致力于新项目。

Krafton大胆进军日本游戏产业

收购Tango Gameworks代表着该公司向日本游戏市场的大规模扩张。这笔交易包括工作室本身和Hi-Fi Rush的版权,微软此前称其为贝塞斯达近年来在Xbox上最成功的发布之一。然而,尽管取得了成就,但由于微软内部的变化,该工作室正面临关闭。

在Windows Central的一份声明中,Krafton欢迎加入Tango Gameworks的团队,并强调此次收购是战略性的,因为它希望加强其全球扩张努力。这标志着该公司在日本的首次重大投资,也是其多元化投资组合计划的一部分,同时也加强了投资组合。

微软还发表声明称,他们将与Krafton合作,以便Tango Gameworks的开发工作能够顺利进行。Tango的几款现有游戏将留在微软,微软发誓不会让它们受到影响。

Hi-Fi Rush续集在新所有权下获得动力

Krafton收购Tango引发了关于Hi-Fi Rush可能续集的传言。这款第三人称节奏格斗游戏因其独特的游戏玩法赢得了评论界的赞誉,并迅速成为粉丝的最爱。现在在Krafton的控制下,看到Hi-Fi Rush 2开发的希望在粉丝中重新燃起,他们认为关闭工作室意味着该系列的终结。

既然Hi-Fi Rush和Tango Gameworks是Krafton产品线的一部分,该工作室创作的其他游戏,如《the Evil Within》或《Ghostwire Tokyo》,都不包括在这笔交易中。这些游戏仍将归微软所有,这将使它们与Krafton领导下的Tango Gameworks所采取的任何新方向区分开来。

Krafton收购Tango Gameworks标志着在一个以大规模裁员和公司倒闭为特征的行业中,工作室免于倒闭的罕见情况。

Related Reads

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, argues that the current AI boom is not an overnight success but the culmination of 80 years of research, now delivering practical results. He emphasizes that this era is defined by the convergence of four key capabilities: large language models (LLMs), reasoning, coding, and agents capable of recursive self-improvement. Andreessen describes the agent architecture—combining an LLM with a shell, file system, markdown, and cron/loop—as a fundamental shift beyond chatbots. This structure leverages existing software components, allowing agents to maintain state, introspect, and extend their own functionality. He predicts a move away from traditional GUI and browser-based interactions toward an "agent-first" world where software is primarily operated by bots, not humans, with people simply stating their goals. He draws parallels to the 2000 internet bubble but notes key differences: current AI infrastructure investments are led by cash-rich giants and quickly monetized. He highlights that scaling constraints involve not just GPUs but the entire chip ecosystem. Open source and edge inference are crucial for democratizing knowledge and enabling low-latency, cost-effective applications on local hardware. Finally, Andreessen identifies significant non-technical challenges: potential short-term cybersecurity crises, the need for "proof of human" identity solutions, financial infrastructure for agents, and institutional resistance from sectors like education and healthcare. He cautions that societal adoption will be slower than technological change.

marsbit4m ago

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

marsbit4m ago

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

Title: Code Was Secure, Yet $293M Stolen: The 2026 DVN Configuration Breach Explained On April 18, 2026, Kelp DAO’s restaking protocol was exploited, losing 116,500 rsETH (worth $293M at the time) due to a configuration flaw—not a smart contract vulnerability. The attacker used a forged cross-chain message to drain funds via LayerZero’s bridge, then dispersed the stolen rsETH across Aave V3, Compound V3, and Euler to borrow real assets, ultimately escaping with $236M in WETH. The root cause was a critical misconfiguration in Kelp’s LayerZero V2 setup: the protocol used a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN) threshold, meaning only one node approval was needed to validate cross-chain messages. The attacker compromised that single node, allowing unauthorized minting of rsETH on Ethereum. This configuration choice—permitted by LayerZero but highly risky—left zero fault tolerance. In contrast, protocols like ApeChain using multi-node validation (e.g., 2-of-3 or 5-of-9) remained secure. This incident highlights a blind spot in DeFi security audits: tools like Slither and Mythril scan code for logic flaws but ignore configuration parameters. The 2022 Nomad hack ($190M loss) also stemmed from a config error, bringing total losses from such issues to ~$482M—rivaling private key breaches. The Kelp exploit underscores the need for standardized config audits and higher baseline security in cross-chain designs.

marsbit10m ago

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

marsbit10m ago

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

OpenAI's recent release of GPT-5.4-Cyber demonstrates a striking convergence with Anthropic's Claude Mythos, reflecting a broader trend of product and strategic alignment between the two AI giants. This is particularly evident in their flagship coding assistants, Codex and Claude Code, which have evolved from distinct philosophies into increasingly similar tools. Initially, Codex emphasized speed and real-time interaction, acting like a fast, junior developer, while Claude Code focused on handling extreme complexity with methodical, large-context analysis. However, both have adopted near-identical solutions to core challenges, such as using isolated sub-tasks or agent teams to prevent context pollution during large-scale code modifications. Benchmark results show a tight race: Codex leads in terminal tasks, while Claude Code excels in complex software engineering benchmarks. Community feedback highlights nuanced differences; Claude Code is faster but can accumulate technical debt, whereas Codex is slower but more deliberate and autonomous. The open-source framework OpenClaw has accelerated this homogenization by standardizing workflows, eroding proprietary advantages. Ultimately, the competition has shifted from pure capability to ecosystem strategy, pricing, and user experience. As these tools become ubiquitous, the developer's role evolves toward higher-level problem definition and architectural thinking, beyond automated code generation.

marsbit11m ago

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片