a16z 的阅读清单：10本你不该错过的优秀书籍推荐

深潮Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

涵盖经济、商业和金融领域。

作者：Stacy Muur

编译：深潮TechFlow

自 2016 年以来，@a16z 定期分享团队的阅读书单。以下是他们推荐的 10 本优秀的经济、商业和金融书籍汇总。

Broken Money

作者：@LynAldenContact

摘要：Broken Money 为读者提供了对货币及其历史的深入理解，涵盖了理论基础和实际影响。

Who Gets What ― and Why

作者：@shanesnow

摘要：Who Gets What—and Why 揭示了我们周围隐藏的匹配市场，并教我们如何识别良好的匹配，以便做出更聪明、更自信的决策。

Smartcuts: How Hackers, Innovators, and Icons Accelerate Success

作者：@shanesnow

摘要：Smartcuts 是一段叙事旅程，揭穿了关于成功的旧有神话。它展示了创新者和偶像如何通过更聪明的工作实现非凡成就，以及我们其他人也能借鉴的方法。

Economics in One Lesson

作者：Henry Hazlitt

摘要：亨利·哈兹利特在1946年撰写了Economics in One Lesson。这本书简洁而富有启发性，准确揭示了许多经济谬论，这些谬论如今几乎成为主流观点。

From Hoodies to Suits

作者：@AnneliseOsborne

摘要：From Hoodies to Suits 连接了科技创新者与传统金融专业人士之间的差距，为在机构环境中实施数字资产提供了一本既娱乐又富有洞察力的指南。

Way of the Turtle

作者：Curtis Faith

摘要：Way of the Turtle 揭示了“海龟”交易系统成功背后的秘密。

The Curious Culture of Economic Theory

作者：Ran Spiegler

摘要：这是一本论文集，深入探讨当代经济理论的专业文化，突出过去二十五年成功经济理论的主要特征。

Radical Markets

作者：Eric Posner & @glenweyl

摘要：Radical Markets 挑战了传统的市场观念，认为只有通过大幅扩展市场的范围，我们才能减少不平等、恢复强劲的经济增长，并解决政治冲突。

The Model Thinker

作者：@Scott_E_Page

摘要：在The Model Thinker中，社会科学家斯科特·E·佩page探讨了一系列数学、统计和计算模型——从线性回归到随机游走及其他——这些模型可以提升人类努力的各个领域。

The Inner Lives of Markets

作者：@RFisman & @Tim_Org

摘要：这本书揭示了商业革命不仅仅是技术的延伸；它实际上涉及市场的转型。书中揭示了我们工作、生活和购物的蓝图，并提供了改善的深刻见解。

Related Reads

My Grievance Against Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle

Title: My Resentment Towards Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle. Summary: The author argues that the DRAM oligopoly (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron) is aggressively raising prices, jeopardizing the ongoing AI investment boom. DRAM contract prices are up nearly 700% year-over-year, with memory projected to consume 40% of hyperscaler capex by 2027. While manufacturers enjoy margins of 60-80%, the soaring cost forces cloud giants like Microsoft to significantly increase budgets. The author contends this is unsustainable, as cloud providers' free cash flow is being consumed by capex. He predicts a turning point in mid-2027, earlier than the consensus view of 2030, when capex growth will stall as cost pressures bite, leading to a peak and subsequent decline in DRAM pricing and manufacturer margins. This challenges the "end of the memory cycle" narrative, asserting that high prices will inevitably curb demand and trigger a downturn.

marsbit48m ago

My Grievance Against Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle

marsbit48m ago

Mining Scale Skyrockets: Why Can't Bitdeer Hold onto Its Bitcoin?

Bitdeer's May 2026 operational data reveals a stark contrast: while its Bitcoin mining output surged to 921 BTC, a 370% year-over-year increase, its end-of-month holdings plummeted to just 171 BTC. This significant disparity highlights that the company, amidst a strategic pivot towards AI cloud infrastructure, continues to rely heavily on selling newly mined Bitcoin to fund operations and expansion, despite reporting a steady $69 million in annualized recurring AI revenue. The trend is consistent with Q1 2026 figures, where mining output reached 2,033 BTC but holdings were a mere 31 BTC, with $206.8 million from digital asset disposals. While the AI business, showing 90% GPU utilization, offers a potential future cash flow buffer to reduce dependency on Bitcoin sales, its current contribution to actual confirmed revenue remains limited. The transformation introduces new risks related to client acquisition, capital-intensive data center projects like Tydal, and delivery timelines. The core question raised is whether the AI venture will successfully generate sufficient stable cash flow to allow Bitdeer to retain more of its mining proceeds as Bitcoin treasury assets, or if the shift merely changes the form of financial pressure while Bitcoin reserves continue to dwindle.

Foresight News56m ago

Mining Scale Skyrockets: Why Can't Bitdeer Hold onto Its Bitcoin?

Foresight News56m ago

Beyond the Model Lies the Harness: Deepseek Enters the Arena, Why Has the Main Battlefield of China's AI Competition Shifted?

In mid-to-late May 2026, Deepseek internally established a new Harness team focused on code agent products, internally benchmarked against Anthropic's Claude Code. This move, marked by the formula "Model + Harness = Agent" in their job postings, signals a major shift in China's AI competition: the main battlefield is transitioning from developing large models to building toolchains and achieving workplace integration. Deepseek's direct involvement in Harness development aims to secure control over interface design and training data feedback loops, moving beyond open-sourcing powerful models. Harness, the runtime infrastructure for AI agents, handles everything beyond model reasoning—task orchestration, tool calling, context management, safety checks, and error recovery. It is crucial because agent products are not just outputs of model capability but also training grounds for it. Real-world task failures recorded by Harness can feed back into model training, creating a flywheel effect. Engineering Harness is more critical than optimizing prompts, as poor context management or error handling can drastically reduce agent success rates in multi-step, real-world scenarios. This shift is not isolated. Other major Chinese tech companies are also pursuing differentiated toolchain strategies. Tencent leverages its enterprise ecosystem (WeChat Work, Tencent Cloud) to build connectors for organizational-level AI collaboration and complex task delivery. Alibaba focuses on lowering automation barriers on the web with a front-end, browser-based GUI Agent framework, PageAgent. This diversification shows the industry recognizes that success lies not in a perfect general agent, but in vertically focused solutions built with robust engineering. The trend is validated by overseas success, such as Poland's Viktor, an AI coworker on Slack achieving $20M ARR by autonomously executing complex, multi-step tasks. This proves a shift in enterprise willingness to pay—from "AI-assisted generation" to "AI-autonomous execution." As Harness matures to provide safety guards and reliability, AI transitions from a human-supervised intern to an independent outsourcer. The competition now faces key engineering challenges: preventing "token explosion" through intelligent context compression, and building "thick frameworks" with features like sandbox isolation and checkpoint recovery for enterprise-grade stability. Geopolitical restrictions on tools like Claude Code further create a significant market vacuum for domestic solutions like Deepseek's Harness. For enterprises and developers, the focus must shift from comparing model benchmarks to evaluating a vendor's engineering capabilities, error recovery mechanisms, context management, and ecosystem compatibility when choosing AI products and platforms.

marsbit58m ago

Beyond the Model Lies the Harness: Deepseek Enters the Arena, Why Has the Main Battlefield of China's AI Competition Shifted?

marsbit58m ago

Stock Price Plummets 32% in a Month! Has MicroStrategy's 'Leveraged Bitcoin Buying' Model Reached Its End?

MicroStrategy's stock has declined 32% over the past month, with its flagship Series A Preferred Stock (STRC) falling below its $100 par value. Analysts attribute the weakness not to Bitcoin's price, but to market concerns over how the company will manage its growing fixed obligations and fund shareholder distributions. MicroStrategy recently sold a small portion of its Bitcoin holdings to meet these payments, marking a shift from its core narrative of continuous capital raises to accumulate Bitcoin. While the company asserts its substantial BTC reserves provide decades of liability coverage, the move has introduced complexity and questions about future financing efficiency. Analysts see this as a period of growing pains rather than an existential threat, noting that investor demand for higher returns reflects increased risk perception.

marsbit1h ago

Stock Price Plummets 32% in a Month! Has MicroStrategy's 'Leveraged Bitcoin Buying' Model Reached Its End?

marsbit1h ago

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit2h ago

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片