公民将尼日利亚政府告上加密货币法庭

币界网Published on 2024-08-11Last updated on 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

尼日利亚加密货币倡导者James Utudor已对政府提起诉讼,针对加密货币的严格限制。

该诉讼点名总统、财政部长、总检察长和几个关键机构,包括尼日利亚中央银行和证券交易委员会。

詹姆斯质疑政府阻止加密货币交易所的举措,认为这些行为侵犯了公民的基本权利。他说:

“我捍卫我们拥有、收购和交易比特币的权利。”

詹姆斯补充说,他希望确保每一个尼日利亚人都能在没有政府干预的情况下自由地使用加密货币。

政府在炮火中的限制

该诉讼针对的是主要的政府实体,包括尼日利亚中央银行、经济和金融犯罪委员会、尼日利亚警察部队和其他几个机构。

詹姆斯的法律团队认为,政府的行为是违宪的,并援引“AG Kaduna State V.Omoru Hassan(1985)”一案作为关键先例。

他们声称,通过限制对加密货币的访问,政府侵犯了宪法第4章所保障的权利。

James的律师Maurice Ebam指出,比特币和USDT不仅仅是加密货币,它们是有助于抵御通货膨胀和促进国际贸易的资产。

“《宪法》第43条保障每个尼日利亚人在尼日利亚任何地方获得和拥有财产的权利。”

该诉讼称,这一权利自然应延伸到加密货币,加密货币在当今经济中越来越重要。

詹姆斯还援引了《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》第14条,该条保护财产权。

该诉讼声称,政府要求电信公司阻止访问加密货币平台的指令显然是越权。

詹姆斯表示,这与公共利益无关,而是不公正地限制了尼日利亚人的财务自由。

尼日利亚对加密货币的敌意

随着新政府的上台,这个非洲国家对加密货币用户的打击只会变得更糟。

随着奈拉的价值波动和外汇越来越难获得,加密货币已成为许多尼日利亚人的避风港。

詹姆斯的诉讼要求立即取消加密货币交易所的所有封锁,确保所有公民不受限制地访问。

他还在推动一项法律声明,保护所有尼日利亚人拥有和交易加密货币的权利,而不会受到政府的骚扰或伤害。

此外,该诉讼呼吁制定新的法规,承认比特币等加密货币是尼日利亚金融体系内的商品。

詹姆斯总结道:“这一法律行动代表了对自由和金融包容性的和平抗议。作为一个建立在人权基础上的国家,我们有责任确保比特币、USDT和其他数字资产用户和持有人的权利得到保护和保障。”

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片