8月5日,Toncoin价格再次上涨6.5%,达到6.81美元的周峰值,这就是为什么TON反弹加剧,而竞争对手的大型股资产则下跌的原因。

币界网Published on 2024-08-10Last updated on 2024-08-10

币界网报道:

8月5日,Toncoin价格再次上涨6.5%,达到6.81美元的周峰值,这就是为什么TON反弹加剧,而竞争对手的大型股资产则下跌的原因。

TON再次上涨6.5%,领先于市场平均水平

Toncoin本周的价格走势波动很大,本周开始呈负面走势,8月5日,由于市场看跌情绪对价格造成严重压力,Toncoin价格跌至4.78美元的3个月低点。

然而,由于几个看涨的催化剂为其价格提供了急需的提振,TON迅速扭转了局面。

TON反弹背后的关键驱动力之一是大量资本流入专注于区块链和数字资产的交易所交易基金(ETF)。

这些资金流入表明,机构对该领域的兴趣日益浓厚,为TON等加密货币提供了顺风。此外,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)最近对Ripple处以1.25亿美元的罚款,导致投资者情绪暂时转变,因为一些交易员将资金转移到其他山寨币,包括Toncoin。

Toncoin价格走势TONUSD |交易视图

TON反弹的另一个主要因素是俄罗斯将加密货币挖矿合法化。这一发展对TON特别有影响,因为加密货币与俄罗斯市场有着密切的联系。采矿合法化不仅促进了监管,也增强了投资者对Toncoin将继续在该地区被采用和使用的信心。

截至8月9日,TON从8月5日的低点飙升了42%,突破了6.80美元的阻力位,又上涨了6.5%。这一突破使TON的表现优于其他主要加密货币,如以太坊和Shiba Inu,这些加密货币面临阻力,随后在同一天回落。

Toncoin网络使用量在市场崩溃中激增

尽管更广泛的加密货币市场面临重大阻力,但Toncoin的网络活动仍然具有弹性。Toncoin区块链上的每日活跃地址(DAA)数量显著增加,从8月4日的682680个增加到8月8日的846820个。

每日活动地址指标跟踪特定日期交易中涉及的唯一地址数量,是网络健康和用户参与度的关键指标。

Toncoin价格与TON每日活跃地址| IntoTheBlock

DAA的激增表明,尽管市场低迷,但Toncoin的用户群仍然活跃,这可能是由上述监管发展和机构投资者兴趣的增加所驱动的。

这种稳定的网络活动可能为8月9日经历的强劲突破TON奠定了基础。参与度的增加可以被视为一个看涨信号,表明加密货币的基本面仍然强劲。因此,网络活动的增加可能预示着在不久的将来价格将进一步上涨。

TON价格预测:7美元突破前将有更多整合

Toncoin最近的反弹无疑引起了交易员的注意,但在另一次重大突破发生之前,一段整合期可能即将到来。Donchian Channels指标显示,TON目前在上边界附近交易,支撑位在6.05美元左右,阻力位在7.31美元。

考虑到力量平衡和当前的看涨势头,短期内TON可能会继续在这个范围内巩固。

吨币价格预测|吨美元

然而,成功突破6.81美元的阻力位可能为向7.50美元甚至更高的价格迈进铺平道路。不利的一面是,如果TON未能守住6.05美元的支撑位,可能会回落至5.50美元的水平。

总体而言,技术指标趋于看涨,只要TON保持目前的势头,就有可能进一步上涨。交易员应密切关注6.81美元的阻力位,因为突破这一点可能预示着下一轮上涨的开始。

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手1h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手1h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit4h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit4h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手5h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手5h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit6h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片