美国国税局更新加密税表格,取消钱包地址要求

币界网Published on 2024-08-09Last updated on 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

美国税务机关公布了加密货币投资者的修订表格,旨在简化数字资产持有人的税收。

美国国税局周五在一份声明中表示,周五发布的1099-DA草案为加密货币投资的税务申报人提供了更多的“便利和清晰度”。修改后的表格省略了之前版本的要求,包括一些数字资产支持者认为侵犯加密货币持有人隐私的问题。

最值得注意的是,最新版本的表格不再要求申报人提供加密钱包地址和交易ID,也不再要求提供与特定纳税年度投资活动相关的加密交易发生时间。

此外,担任加密货币经纪人的税务申报人不必指定他们是哪种类型的经纪人。

AR Media Consulting的首席执行官兼律师Andrew Rossow告诉Decrypt,虽然最新的1099-DA修订将缓解数字资产投资者的一些隐私问题,但美国税务机关可以做更多的事情来简化这些投资者的申请程序。

Rossow周五表示:“新形式可能会解决其中一些问题,但不一定能解决加密货币领域税收合规的根本挑战。”。“加密货币税收格局对个人和企业来说仍然很复杂,特别是在美国证券交易委员会/美国商品期货交易委员会仍在讨论泳道的情况下。”

此外,他说,尽管更广泛的加密货币市场存在多样性,但美国国税局似乎只关注最主流的渠道。

Rossow表示:“对Coinbase和Kraken等中心化交易所的关注无疑忽视了新兴的DeFi生态系统,众所周知,DeFi生态系统的运作原理截然不同。”。“这可能会造成不公平的竞争环境,扼杀加密货币行业的创新。”

他补充说,美国国税局不仅会增加加密货币业务的合规成本,而且数据收集可能会带来新的风险。

“政府越来越多地获取金融数据可能会导致过度和意外的后果,”Rossow警告说,并指出可能存在数据泄露和身份盗窃。

美国于2024年4月首次公布了针对加密货币投资者的1099-DA税单草案。美国国税局表示,公众有30天的时间对最新的1099-DA草案发表意见。

目前尚不清楚该表格的最终版本何时发布。改进后的1099-DA首次亮相的时间也不确定,但人们普遍认为该表格将在2025纳税年度开始使用。

美国国税局没有立即回复Decrypt的置评请求。

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Related Reads

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit31m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片